{"title":"Effects of Exposure to Different Types of Microplastics on the Growth and Development of <i>Rana zhenhaiensis</i> Tadpoles.","authors":"Shimin Xiao, Hao Chen, Xiyao Gao, Xinni He, Rongzhou Jin, Yunqi Wei, Shuran Li, Lei Xie, Yongpu Zhang","doi":"10.3390/toxics13030165","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Microplastic (MP) pollution is a major environmental problem, but a comparative study of the toxicological effects of different MPs remains lacking. To explore the toxicological effects of three different microplastics, namely, polypropylene (PP), polystyrene (PS) and polyethylene (PE), Zhenhai brown frog (<i>Rana zhenhaiensis</i>) tadpoles were used as the model animal. The results showed that exposure to PE and PS significantly reduced the metamorphosis rate of the tadpoles. Compared with the control group, the body weight of tadpoles in all MP treatments was significantly reduced compared with that of the control group. In addition, exposure to PE reduced the body length and hind limb length of tadpoles. The number of pigment cells increased and intercellular spaces expanded in the liver tissues of tadpoles receiving PS and PE treatments. The composition and function of the intestinal microbiota in the PP treatment and control groups were similar, whereas between the PS treatment and control, they differed. Liver transcriptome sequencing revealed significant alterations in key genes associated with oxidative stress, energy metabolism, immune response, and apoptosis signaling pathways with PS treatment and PP treatment. In summary, MPs may have harmed tadpoles to varying degrees by interfering with related signaling pathways. The negative effects of PE and PS were greater than those of PP.</p>","PeriodicalId":23195,"journal":{"name":"Toxics","volume":"13 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11945619/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Toxics","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics13030165","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Microplastic (MP) pollution is a major environmental problem, but a comparative study of the toxicological effects of different MPs remains lacking. To explore the toxicological effects of three different microplastics, namely, polypropylene (PP), polystyrene (PS) and polyethylene (PE), Zhenhai brown frog (Rana zhenhaiensis) tadpoles were used as the model animal. The results showed that exposure to PE and PS significantly reduced the metamorphosis rate of the tadpoles. Compared with the control group, the body weight of tadpoles in all MP treatments was significantly reduced compared with that of the control group. In addition, exposure to PE reduced the body length and hind limb length of tadpoles. The number of pigment cells increased and intercellular spaces expanded in the liver tissues of tadpoles receiving PS and PE treatments. The composition and function of the intestinal microbiota in the PP treatment and control groups were similar, whereas between the PS treatment and control, they differed. Liver transcriptome sequencing revealed significant alterations in key genes associated with oxidative stress, energy metabolism, immune response, and apoptosis signaling pathways with PS treatment and PP treatment. In summary, MPs may have harmed tadpoles to varying degrees by interfering with related signaling pathways. The negative effects of PE and PS were greater than those of PP.
ToxicsChemical Engineering-Chemical Health and Safety
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
10.90%
发文量
681
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊介绍:
Toxics (ISSN 2305-6304) is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal which provides an advanced forum for studies related to all aspects of toxic chemicals and materials. It publishes reviews, regular research papers, and short communications. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in detail. There is, therefore, no restriction on the maximum length of the papers, although authors should write their papers in a clear and concise way. The full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced. Electronic files or software regarding the full details of calculations and experimental procedure can be deposited as supplementary material, if it is not possible to publish them along with the text.