Is It Safe to Omit Any Chest X-Ray Before Removing the Chest Drain After Elective, Non-Cardiac Thoracic Surgery? A Single-Center, Retrospective, Case-Control Study.
Ioannis Karampinis, Carolin Reker, Laura Grifone, Fabio Souschek, Christian Galata, Davor Stamenovic, Eric Roessner
{"title":"Is It Safe to Omit Any Chest X-Ray Before Removing the Chest Drain After Elective, Non-Cardiac Thoracic Surgery? A Single-Center, Retrospective, Case-Control Study.","authors":"Ioannis Karampinis, Carolin Reker, Laura Grifone, Fabio Souschek, Christian Galata, Davor Stamenovic, Eric Roessner","doi":"10.1111/1759-7714.70050","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Every patient undergoing non-cardiac thoracic surgery will receive several chest X-rays through the perioperative period. The patient might receive a preoperative X-ray as a baseline as well as several X-rays before and after drain removal. This routine has several disadvantages, for the patient, the health care system and the medical staff. Purpose of this study was to examine if all X-rays before removal of the drain can be omitted.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Two hundred fifty-five patients who underwent elective thoracic surgery were included in this retrospective analysis. Patients undergoing urgent procedures or empyema surgery, as well as patients with symptoms requiring further diagnostic measures or patients who required clamping of the drain before removal, were excluded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty-five patients received an X-ray before removal of the drain, and 210 patients did not. The X-ray group developed significantly more minor complications than the no X-ray group. 46.7% of the X-rays before drain removal (X-ray group) were reported with abnormalities. However, these abnormalities never led to a change in patient care. Drainage time and postoperative hospital stay were significantly longer in the X-ray group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Omitting any X-ray between surgery and removal of the chest drain appears to be safe in our retrospective patient cohort. The proposed benefits of omitting the X-ray are very relevant for the health care system, the medical and nursing teams, and, more importantly, for the patients. Evidence suggests that X-ray of patients regularly do not exist. It is therefore reasonable to consider exploring this question in a formal prospective trial.</p>","PeriodicalId":23338,"journal":{"name":"Thoracic Cancer","volume":"16 7","pages":"e70050"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11950153/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Thoracic Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1759-7714.70050","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Every patient undergoing non-cardiac thoracic surgery will receive several chest X-rays through the perioperative period. The patient might receive a preoperative X-ray as a baseline as well as several X-rays before and after drain removal. This routine has several disadvantages, for the patient, the health care system and the medical staff. Purpose of this study was to examine if all X-rays before removal of the drain can be omitted.
Methods: Two hundred fifty-five patients who underwent elective thoracic surgery were included in this retrospective analysis. Patients undergoing urgent procedures or empyema surgery, as well as patients with symptoms requiring further diagnostic measures or patients who required clamping of the drain before removal, were excluded.
Results: Forty-five patients received an X-ray before removal of the drain, and 210 patients did not. The X-ray group developed significantly more minor complications than the no X-ray group. 46.7% of the X-rays before drain removal (X-ray group) were reported with abnormalities. However, these abnormalities never led to a change in patient care. Drainage time and postoperative hospital stay were significantly longer in the X-ray group.
Conclusions: Omitting any X-ray between surgery and removal of the chest drain appears to be safe in our retrospective patient cohort. The proposed benefits of omitting the X-ray are very relevant for the health care system, the medical and nursing teams, and, more importantly, for the patients. Evidence suggests that X-ray of patients regularly do not exist. It is therefore reasonable to consider exploring this question in a formal prospective trial.
背景:每位接受非心脏胸腔手术的患者都会在围手术期接受数次胸部 X 光检查。患者可能会接受术前 X 光作为基线,并在移除引流管前后接受数次 X 光检查。这种常规做法对患者、医疗保健系统和医务人员都有一些不利之处。本研究旨在探讨是否可以省略移除引流管前的所有X光检查:这项回顾性分析纳入了 255 名接受择期胸腔手术的患者。结果:45 名患者在拔除引流管前接受了 X 光检查:结果:45名患者在移除引流管前接受了X光检查,210名患者没有。X光组出现的轻微并发症明显多于无X光组。在移除引流管前进行的X光检查中,有46.7%(X光组)被报告有异常。然而,这些异常从未导致患者护理的改变。X光组的引流时间和术后住院时间明显更长:结论:在我们的回顾性患者队列中,从手术到移除胸腔引流管之间省略任何 X 光检查似乎都是安全的。结论:在我们的回顾性患者队列中,在手术和移除胸腔引流管之间省略任何 X 光检查似乎是安全的。省略 X 光检查的好处对医疗保健系统、医疗和护理团队,更重要的是对患者来说非常重要。有证据表明,对患者定期进行 X 光检查的做法并不存在。因此,考虑在正式的前瞻性试验中探讨这一问题是合理的。
期刊介绍:
Thoracic Cancer aims to facilitate international collaboration and exchange of comprehensive and cutting-edge information on basic, translational, and applied clinical research in lung cancer, esophageal cancer, mediastinal cancer, breast cancer and other thoracic malignancies. Prevention, treatment and research relevant to Asia-Pacific is a focus area, but submissions from all regions are welcomed. The editors encourage contributions relevant to prevention, general thoracic surgery, medical oncology, radiology, radiation medicine, pathology, basic cancer research, as well as epidemiological and translational studies in thoracic cancer. Thoracic Cancer is the official publication of the Chinese Society of Lung Cancer, International Chinese Society of Thoracic Surgery and is endorsed by the Korean Association for the Study of Lung Cancer and the Hong Kong Cancer Therapy Society.
The Journal publishes a range of article types including: Editorials, Invited Reviews, Mini Reviews, Original Articles, Clinical Guidelines, Technological Notes, Imaging in thoracic cancer, Meeting Reports, Case Reports, Letters to the Editor, Commentaries, and Brief Reports.