Excretion Routes of Okadaic Acid and Dinophysistoxin-2 from Mussels (Mytilus galloprovincialis) and Cockles (Cerastoderma edule).

IF 3.9 3区 医学 Q2 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Toxins Pub Date : 2025-03-09 DOI:10.3390/toxins17030128
Juan Blanco, Noelia Estévez-Calvar, Helena Martín
{"title":"Excretion Routes of Okadaic Acid and Dinophysistoxin-2 from Mussels (<i>Mytilus galloprovincialis</i>) and Cockles (<i>Cerastoderma edule</i>).","authors":"Juan Blanco, Noelia Estévez-Calvar, Helena Martín","doi":"10.3390/toxins17030128","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The knowledge of the routes of excretion of the toxins accumulated by molluscs is a key step in designing methods that accelerate depuration. In this work, the excretion route, in mussels and cockles, of the main diarrhetic shellfish poisoning (DSP) toxins in Europe (okadaic acid and dinophysistoxin-2) after natural intoxication were studied. During depuration, the amounts of free toxins and their derivatives were quantified in bivalves, faeces, and water. Most toxins (>98%) were excreted through faeces as acyl derivatives (most likely 7-<i>O-</i>acyl esters), independent of the ratio between these derivatives and free toxins in soft tissues. The small proportion of toxins excreted into water mostly constituted the free forms of the toxins. Both species shared the same route even though they contained very different proportions of free toxins in their soft tissues. No substantial changes in this general pattern were observed during the experiment. The esters of fatty acids with 16 carbon atoms were the most abundant in both soft tissues and faeces, but they were not the same in mussels and cockles. Most of the variability in ester proportions can be attributed to the species more than to their differential excretion (water or faeces) suggesting that there are not large differences in the depuration of the different esters.</p>","PeriodicalId":23119,"journal":{"name":"Toxins","volume":"17 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11945354/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Toxins","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins17030128","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The knowledge of the routes of excretion of the toxins accumulated by molluscs is a key step in designing methods that accelerate depuration. In this work, the excretion route, in mussels and cockles, of the main diarrhetic shellfish poisoning (DSP) toxins in Europe (okadaic acid and dinophysistoxin-2) after natural intoxication were studied. During depuration, the amounts of free toxins and their derivatives were quantified in bivalves, faeces, and water. Most toxins (>98%) were excreted through faeces as acyl derivatives (most likely 7-O-acyl esters), independent of the ratio between these derivatives and free toxins in soft tissues. The small proportion of toxins excreted into water mostly constituted the free forms of the toxins. Both species shared the same route even though they contained very different proportions of free toxins in their soft tissues. No substantial changes in this general pattern were observed during the experiment. The esters of fatty acids with 16 carbon atoms were the most abundant in both soft tissues and faeces, but they were not the same in mussels and cockles. Most of the variability in ester proportions can be attributed to the species more than to their differential excretion (water or faeces) suggesting that there are not large differences in the depuration of the different esters.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Toxins
Toxins TOXICOLOGY-
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
16.70%
发文量
765
审稿时长
16.24 days
期刊介绍: Toxins (ISSN 2072-6651) is an international, peer-reviewed open access journal which provides an advanced forum for studies related to toxins and toxinology. It publishes reviews, regular research papers and short communications. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. The full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信