The Effect of Micro-Focused Ultrasound Treatment on Intradermal Botulinum Toxin Type A Injection.

IF 3.9 3区 医学 Q2 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Toxins Pub Date : 2025-03-19 DOI:10.3390/toxins17030147
Sarawin Harnchoowong, Natthachat Jurairattanaporn, Vasanop Vachiramon
{"title":"The Effect of Micro-Focused Ultrasound Treatment on Intradermal Botulinum Toxin Type A Injection.","authors":"Sarawin Harnchoowong, Natthachat Jurairattanaporn, Vasanop Vachiramon","doi":"10.3390/toxins17030147","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Botulinum toxin type A (BoNT-A) injection and micro-focused ultrasound with visualization (MFU-V) are becoming increasingly popular for various esthetic conditions. However, performing MFU-V subsequently to BoNT-A injection may diminish the efficacy of BoNT-A. Previous reports have indicated the impact of various energy-based devices on BoNT-A. Nevertheless, the influence of MFU-V on BoNT-A has yet to be investigated. Thus, this study aims to evaluate the effect of MFU-V on BoNT-A injection and to determine the optimal interval between each treatment. A randomized controlled study was conducted on 15 subjects. Each participant was assigned to receive four sites of intradermal BoNT-A injection on their forehead. Following BoNT-A injection, these locations were randomized to receive either no MFU-V treatment or further treatment with MFU-V (superficial transducer, 10.0 MHz, 1.5 mm) on the same day, Day 7, or Day 14. On Day 28 following injection, the anhidrosis area was measured using the iodine starch test to objectively evaluate the result. In comparison to the control site (1.10 cm<sup>2</sup>), the anhidrotic area was significantly smaller in all MFU-V treated sites (0.74 cm<sup>2</sup> in immediate MFU-V treatment, <i>p</i> < 0.001; 0.90 cm<sup>2</sup> in MFU-V Day 7, <i>p</i> = 0.005; 0.93 cm<sup>2</sup> in MFU-V Day 14, <i>p</i> = 0.021). There were no serious and esthetic complications reported in our study. <b>In conclusion,</b> MFU-V with a superficial depth transducer significantly reduced the efficacy of intradermal BoNT-A injection, especially within two weeks following BoNT-A injection. After BoNT-A injection, we recommend MFU-V treatment should be avoided for at least two weeks. Further study is required to evaluate the optimal interval between these two treatments.</p>","PeriodicalId":23119,"journal":{"name":"Toxins","volume":"17 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11945533/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Toxins","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins17030147","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Botulinum toxin type A (BoNT-A) injection and micro-focused ultrasound with visualization (MFU-V) are becoming increasingly popular for various esthetic conditions. However, performing MFU-V subsequently to BoNT-A injection may diminish the efficacy of BoNT-A. Previous reports have indicated the impact of various energy-based devices on BoNT-A. Nevertheless, the influence of MFU-V on BoNT-A has yet to be investigated. Thus, this study aims to evaluate the effect of MFU-V on BoNT-A injection and to determine the optimal interval between each treatment. A randomized controlled study was conducted on 15 subjects. Each participant was assigned to receive four sites of intradermal BoNT-A injection on their forehead. Following BoNT-A injection, these locations were randomized to receive either no MFU-V treatment or further treatment with MFU-V (superficial transducer, 10.0 MHz, 1.5 mm) on the same day, Day 7, or Day 14. On Day 28 following injection, the anhidrosis area was measured using the iodine starch test to objectively evaluate the result. In comparison to the control site (1.10 cm2), the anhidrotic area was significantly smaller in all MFU-V treated sites (0.74 cm2 in immediate MFU-V treatment, p < 0.001; 0.90 cm2 in MFU-V Day 7, p = 0.005; 0.93 cm2 in MFU-V Day 14, p = 0.021). There were no serious and esthetic complications reported in our study. In conclusion, MFU-V with a superficial depth transducer significantly reduced the efficacy of intradermal BoNT-A injection, especially within two weeks following BoNT-A injection. After BoNT-A injection, we recommend MFU-V treatment should be avoided for at least two weeks. Further study is required to evaluate the optimal interval between these two treatments.

A 型肉毒杆菌毒素(BoNT-A)注射和可视化微聚焦超声波(MFU-V)在治疗各种美容病症方面越来越受欢迎。然而,在注射 BoNT-A 之后再进行 MFU-V 可能会降低 BoNT-A 的疗效。之前的报告已经指出了各种基于能量的设备对 BoNT-A 的影响。然而,MFU-V 对 BoNT-A 的影响还有待研究。因此,本研究旨在评估 MFU-V 对 BoNT-A 注射的影响,并确定每次治疗的最佳间隔时间。本研究对 15 名受试者进行了随机对照研究。每名受试者都被分配到前额的四个部位接受皮内 BoNT-A 注射。注射 BoNT-A 后,这些部位被随机分配到不接受 MFU-V 治疗或在同一天、第 7 天或第 14 天继续接受 MFU-V 治疗(表层换能器,10.0 MHz,1.5 mm)。注射后第 28 天,使用碘淀粉试验测量无汗区面积,以客观评估结果。与对照部位(1.10 平方厘米)相比,所有接受过 MFU-V 治疗的部位的潮湿面积都明显较小(立即接受 MFU-V 治疗者为 0.74 平方厘米,p < 0.001;第 7 天接受 MFU-V 治疗者为 0.90 平方厘米,p = 0.005;第 14 天接受 MFU-V 治疗者为 0.93 平方厘米,p = 0.021)。我们的研究中没有发现严重的美学并发症。总之,使用表层深度传感器的 MFU-V 能显著降低皮内注射 BoNT-A 的疗效,尤其是在注射 BoNT-A 后的两周内。我们建议在注射 BoNT-A 后,至少两周内应避免使用 MFU-V 治疗。要评估这两种治疗之间的最佳间隔时间,还需要进一步的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Toxins
Toxins TOXICOLOGY-
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
16.70%
发文量
765
审稿时长
16.24 days
期刊介绍: Toxins (ISSN 2072-6651) is an international, peer-reviewed open access journal which provides an advanced forum for studies related to toxins and toxinology. It publishes reviews, regular research papers and short communications. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. The full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信