Effect of a Surgeon-Directed Cocktail of Ropivacaine, Methylprednisolone, and Ketoprofen on Postoperative Pain and Ambulation in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Surgery: A Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial.

IF 2.6 2区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Spine Pub Date : 2025-03-28 DOI:10.1097/BRS.0000000000005314
Tomohiro Yamada, Yu Yamato, Tomohiko Hasegawa, Go Yoshida, Tomohiro Banno, Hideyuki Arima, Shin Oe, Hiroki Ushirozako, Koichiro Ide, Kenta Kurosu, Yosuke Shibata, Yukihiro Matsuyama
{"title":"Effect of a Surgeon-Directed Cocktail of Ropivacaine, Methylprednisolone, and Ketoprofen on Postoperative Pain and Ambulation in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Surgery: A Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"Tomohiro Yamada, Yu Yamato, Tomohiko Hasegawa, Go Yoshida, Tomohiro Banno, Hideyuki Arima, Shin Oe, Hiroki Ushirozako, Koichiro Ide, Kenta Kurosu, Yosuke Shibata, Yukihiro Matsuyama","doi":"10.1097/BRS.0000000000005314","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Double-blind randomized controlled trial.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the safety and efficacy of surgeon-directed intraoperative subfascial cocktail analgesics in adolescent scoliosis surgery.</p><p><strong>Summary of background data: </strong>Several studies have demonstrated the efficacy of intraoperative surgeon-directed analgesics in idiopathic scoliosis surgery. However, their retrospective analyses provided limited clinical evidence. Are cocktail analgesics effective in improving postoperative pain in idiopathic scoliosis surgery? Can surgeon-directed intraoperative cocktail analgesics improve postoperative pain scores and help patients ambulate?</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Forty-two adolescent patients (mean age 15.8±2.1 years, 31 females) were randomly assigned to two groups: one receiving cocktail analgesics (21 patients), and the other serving as a control (21 patients). The cocktail consisted of 0.75% ropivacaine, methylprednisone, and ketoprofen. The primary outcome measured was postoperative pain (NRS). Secondary outcomes included ambulation timing, fentanyl and acetaminophen usage. Epidural anesthesia usage was recorded but not analyzed as an independent outcome since perceived pain severity may have influenced its administration.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty-two patients (mean age: 15.8±2.1 years, 31 females) were included. Both groups had comparable baseline characteristics, including age, sex distribution, and preoperative curve severity. The cocktail group showed significantly lower pain scores 1 hour post-surgery (4.1±3.7 vs. 5.6±2.9, P=0.044) and ambulated earlier (2.5±0.5 vs. 3.3±2.5 days, P=0.049). However, there were no significant differences in pain scores after 6 hours or in fentanyl/acetaminophen consumption. Adverse events attributable to the procedures were comparable between both groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Surgeon-directed cocktail therapy alone is insufficient to achieve significant improvements in pain control, as evidenced by the minimal impact on NRS scores and early ambulation promotion. Clinically, this underscores the need for more comprehensive, multimodal pain management strategies to optimize postoperative recovery and enhance outcomes for patients with adolescent scoliosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":22193,"journal":{"name":"Spine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000005314","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Study design: Double-blind randomized controlled trial.

Objective: To assess the safety and efficacy of surgeon-directed intraoperative subfascial cocktail analgesics in adolescent scoliosis surgery.

Summary of background data: Several studies have demonstrated the efficacy of intraoperative surgeon-directed analgesics in idiopathic scoliosis surgery. However, their retrospective analyses provided limited clinical evidence. Are cocktail analgesics effective in improving postoperative pain in idiopathic scoliosis surgery? Can surgeon-directed intraoperative cocktail analgesics improve postoperative pain scores and help patients ambulate?

Methods: Forty-two adolescent patients (mean age 15.8±2.1 years, 31 females) were randomly assigned to two groups: one receiving cocktail analgesics (21 patients), and the other serving as a control (21 patients). The cocktail consisted of 0.75% ropivacaine, methylprednisone, and ketoprofen. The primary outcome measured was postoperative pain (NRS). Secondary outcomes included ambulation timing, fentanyl and acetaminophen usage. Epidural anesthesia usage was recorded but not analyzed as an independent outcome since perceived pain severity may have influenced its administration.

Results: Forty-two patients (mean age: 15.8±2.1 years, 31 females) were included. Both groups had comparable baseline characteristics, including age, sex distribution, and preoperative curve severity. The cocktail group showed significantly lower pain scores 1 hour post-surgery (4.1±3.7 vs. 5.6±2.9, P=0.044) and ambulated earlier (2.5±0.5 vs. 3.3±2.5 days, P=0.049). However, there were no significant differences in pain scores after 6 hours or in fentanyl/acetaminophen consumption. Adverse events attributable to the procedures were comparable between both groups.

Conclusions: Surgeon-directed cocktail therapy alone is insufficient to achieve significant improvements in pain control, as evidenced by the minimal impact on NRS scores and early ambulation promotion. Clinically, this underscores the need for more comprehensive, multimodal pain management strategies to optimize postoperative recovery and enhance outcomes for patients with adolescent scoliosis.

罗哌卡因、甲基强的松龙和酮洛芬对青少年特发性脊柱侧凸手术术后疼痛和活动的影响:一项双盲随机对照试验。
研究设计:双盲随机对照试验。目的:评价手术指导下筋膜下鸡尾酒镇痛在青少年脊柱侧凸手术中的安全性和有效性。背景资料总结:几项研究已经证明术中外科指导的止痛剂在特发性脊柱侧凸手术中的有效性。然而,他们的回顾性分析提供了有限的临床证据。鸡尾酒镇痛药对改善特发性脊柱侧凸术后疼痛有效吗?外科医生指导的术中鸡尾酒镇痛药能改善术后疼痛评分并帮助患者行走吗?方法:将42例青少年患者(平均年龄15.8±2.1岁,女性31例)随机分为两组,分别给予鸡尾酒镇痛药治疗组(21例)和对照组(21例)。鸡尾酒由0.75%的罗哌卡因、甲基强的松和酮洛芬组成。主要观察指标为术后疼痛(NRS)。次要结局包括下床时间、芬太尼和对乙酰氨基酚的使用。我们记录了硬膜外麻醉的使用情况,但没有将其作为一个独立的结果进行分析,因为感知到的疼痛严重程度可能会影响其给药。结果:纳入42例患者,平均年龄15.8±2.1岁,女性31例。两组具有相似的基线特征,包括年龄、性别分布和术前曲线严重程度。鸡尾酒治疗组术后1 h疼痛评分明显降低(4.1±3.7比5.6±2.9,P=0.044),且下床时间较早(2.5±0.5比3.3±2.5,P=0.049)。然而,6小时后疼痛评分或芬太尼/对乙酰氨基酚用量无显著差异。两组之间可归因于手术的不良事件具有可比性。结论:单靠外科医生指导的鸡尾酒疗法不足以显著改善疼痛控制,对NRS评分和早期活动促进的影响微乎其微。在临床上,这强调了需要更全面、多模式的疼痛管理策略来优化青少年脊柱侧凸患者的术后恢复和提高预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Spine
Spine 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
6.70%
发文量
361
审稿时长
6.0 months
期刊介绍: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins is a leading international publisher of professional health information for physicians, nurses, specialized clinicians and students. For a complete listing of titles currently published by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins and detailed information about print, online, and other offerings, please visit the LWW Online Store. Recognized internationally as the leading journal in its field, Spine is an international, peer-reviewed, bi-weekly periodical that considers for publication original articles in the field of Spine. It is the leading subspecialty journal for the treatment of spinal disorders. Only original papers are considered for publication with the understanding that they are contributed solely to Spine. The Journal does not publish articles reporting material that has been reported at length elsewhere.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信