Neural gating of respiratory sensations as a potential mechanism of dyspnea perception: State-of-the-art and future directions

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 PHYSIOLOGY
Valentina Jelinčić , Pei-Ying S. Chan , Paul W. Davenport , Andreas von Leupoldt
{"title":"Neural gating of respiratory sensations as a potential mechanism of dyspnea perception: State-of-the-art and future directions","authors":"Valentina Jelinčić ,&nbsp;Pei-Ying S. Chan ,&nbsp;Paul W. Davenport ,&nbsp;Andreas von Leupoldt","doi":"10.1016/j.resp.2025.104418","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Context</h3><div>Dyspnea – the subjective experience of breathing discomfort – is a prevalent and debilitating symptom in various chronic conditions, featuring a complex interplay of sensory, cognitive, and emotional factors contributing to its perception. In recent years, growing evidence emerged for the importance of neural processing in shaping symptom experiences such as dyspnea.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This frontiers review focuses on the neural gating of respiratory sensations (NGRS), as a potential neural mechanism underlying dyspnea perception. NGRS is measured by the repetition suppression of respiratory-related evoked potentials (RREP) elicited by paired inspiratory occlusions. NGRS may reflect the brain’s capacity to filter redundant respiratory input, and reduced NGRS may constitute a biomarker for aversive dyspnea experience.</div></div><div><h3>Review</h3><div>We summarize the current state-of-the-art on the relationships between NGRS and dyspnea, noting the inconsistent findings in healthy individuals along with promising evidence from clinical populations, such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The inconsistent findings may be attributed to methodological limitations, including the significant variability in experimental designs and analytical choices hampering NGRS reliability, and the influence of top-down attention and expectations. In the final part of the review, we suggest future directions for the investigation of the NGRS-dyspnea relationship, including mechanistic research using advanced EEG analysis, mobile neuroimaging, and brain stimulation techniques to delineate the contributions of top-down and bottom-up mechanisms to NGRS.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>By addressing the current knowledge gaps, this review forms a part of the concentrated effort to promote brain-based interventions for alleviating the distressing experience of chronic dyspnea.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20961,"journal":{"name":"Respiratory Physiology & Neurobiology","volume":"336 ","pages":"Article 104418"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Respiratory Physiology & Neurobiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1569904825000291","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHYSIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Context

Dyspnea – the subjective experience of breathing discomfort – is a prevalent and debilitating symptom in various chronic conditions, featuring a complex interplay of sensory, cognitive, and emotional factors contributing to its perception. In recent years, growing evidence emerged for the importance of neural processing in shaping symptom experiences such as dyspnea.

Objective

This frontiers review focuses on the neural gating of respiratory sensations (NGRS), as a potential neural mechanism underlying dyspnea perception. NGRS is measured by the repetition suppression of respiratory-related evoked potentials (RREP) elicited by paired inspiratory occlusions. NGRS may reflect the brain’s capacity to filter redundant respiratory input, and reduced NGRS may constitute a biomarker for aversive dyspnea experience.

Review

We summarize the current state-of-the-art on the relationships between NGRS and dyspnea, noting the inconsistent findings in healthy individuals along with promising evidence from clinical populations, such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The inconsistent findings may be attributed to methodological limitations, including the significant variability in experimental designs and analytical choices hampering NGRS reliability, and the influence of top-down attention and expectations. In the final part of the review, we suggest future directions for the investigation of the NGRS-dyspnea relationship, including mechanistic research using advanced EEG analysis, mobile neuroimaging, and brain stimulation techniques to delineate the contributions of top-down and bottom-up mechanisms to NGRS.

Conclusions

By addressing the current knowledge gaps, this review forms a part of the concentrated effort to promote brain-based interventions for alleviating the distressing experience of chronic dyspnea.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
8.70%
发文量
104
审稿时长
54 days
期刊介绍: Respiratory Physiology & Neurobiology (RESPNB) publishes original articles and invited reviews concerning physiology and pathophysiology of respiration in its broadest sense. Although a special focus is on topics in neurobiology, high quality papers in respiratory molecular and cellular biology are also welcome, as are high-quality papers in traditional areas, such as: -Mechanics of breathing- Gas exchange and acid-base balance- Respiration at rest and exercise- Respiration in unusual conditions, like high or low pressure or changes of temperature, low ambient oxygen- Embryonic and adult respiration- Comparative respiratory physiology. Papers on clinical aspects, original methods, as well as theoretical papers are also considered as long as they foster the understanding of respiratory physiology and pathophysiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信