Efficacy of mHealth in Patients With Chronic Neck Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING
Xiaotong Xie, Hui Wang, Xue Gao, Hualiang Chen, Lingjun Zhou
{"title":"Efficacy of mHealth in Patients With Chronic Neck Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Xiaotong Xie, Hui Wang, Xue Gao, Hualiang Chen, Lingjun Zhou","doi":"10.1016/j.pmn.2025.03.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To assess the efficacy of mobile health-based interventions for alleviating symptoms of chronic neck pain in patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search was conducted in databases, including the China National Knowledge Infrastructure, VIP, Wanfang, Chinese Biomedical Databases, PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library, for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) regarding support provided to patients with chronic neck pain using mobile health interventions from database inception to March 2024. Two researchers independently screened the literature and evaluated the quality using the Cochrane Handbook 5.1 risk of bias assessment tool. Statistical analyses were performed using RevMan 5.2, and the quality of evidence was assessed according to the GRADE criteria.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ten RCTs comprising 825 participants were included. A meta-analysis indicated that mobile health interventions were more effective than other physical therapies for reducing pain (short-term: SMD = -0.76, [95% CI -1.50, -0.02], p = .04; mid-term: SMD = -0.48, [95% CI -0.78, -0.18], p < .01), although there was no significant difference for improving neck disability status (short-term: MD = -6.74, [95% CI -13.65, 0.17], p = .06; mid-term: SMD = -2.26 [95% CI -6.71, 2.20], p = .32). Compared to minimal intervention, mobile health interventions were more effective in reducing pain (short-term: SMD = -1.16, [95% CI -1.70, -0.63], p < .001) and improving neck disability status (short-term: MD = -7.88, [95% CI -12.27, -3.13], p < .001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Mobile health-based interventions positively affected the predictive outcomes for patients with chronic neck pain, reduced pain levels, and improved neck disability. Further research is needed to demonstrate their benefits for reducing fear of pain and improving quality of life.</p>","PeriodicalId":19959,"journal":{"name":"Pain Management Nursing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pain Management Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmn.2025.03.001","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To assess the efficacy of mobile health-based interventions for alleviating symptoms of chronic neck pain in patients.

Methods: A systematic search was conducted in databases, including the China National Knowledge Infrastructure, VIP, Wanfang, Chinese Biomedical Databases, PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library, for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) regarding support provided to patients with chronic neck pain using mobile health interventions from database inception to March 2024. Two researchers independently screened the literature and evaluated the quality using the Cochrane Handbook 5.1 risk of bias assessment tool. Statistical analyses were performed using RevMan 5.2, and the quality of evidence was assessed according to the GRADE criteria.

Results: Ten RCTs comprising 825 participants were included. A meta-analysis indicated that mobile health interventions were more effective than other physical therapies for reducing pain (short-term: SMD = -0.76, [95% CI -1.50, -0.02], p = .04; mid-term: SMD = -0.48, [95% CI -0.78, -0.18], p < .01), although there was no significant difference for improving neck disability status (short-term: MD = -6.74, [95% CI -13.65, 0.17], p = .06; mid-term: SMD = -2.26 [95% CI -6.71, 2.20], p = .32). Compared to minimal intervention, mobile health interventions were more effective in reducing pain (short-term: SMD = -1.16, [95% CI -1.70, -0.63], p < .001) and improving neck disability status (short-term: MD = -7.88, [95% CI -12.27, -3.13], p < .001).

Conclusions: Mobile health-based interventions positively affected the predictive outcomes for patients with chronic neck pain, reduced pain levels, and improved neck disability. Further research is needed to demonstrate their benefits for reducing fear of pain and improving quality of life.

目的评估基于移动医疗的干预措施对缓解慢性颈痛患者症状的疗效:在中国国家知识基础设施、VIP、万方、中国生物医学数据库、PubMed、Embase、Web of Science 和 Cochrane 图书馆等数据库中进行了系统检索,以了解自数据库建立至 2024 年 3 月期间有关使用移动健康干预为慢性颈痛患者提供支持的随机对照试验 (RCT)。两名研究人员独立筛选文献,并使用 Cochrane 手册 5.1 偏倚风险评估工具对文献质量进行评估。使用 RevMan 5.2 进行统计分析,并根据 GRADE 标准评估证据质量:结果:共纳入了 10 项 RCT,共有 825 名参与者。一项荟萃分析表明,移动医疗干预在减轻疼痛方面比其他物理疗法更有效(短期:SMD = -0.76,[-0.76]):SMD = -0.76,[95% CI -1.50, -0.02],p = .04;中期:SMD = -0.48,[95% CI -1.50, -0.02],p = .04:SMD=-0.48,[95% CI -0.78,-0.18],p <.01),但在改善颈部残疾状况方面没有显著差异(短期:SMD =-6.74,[95% CI -0.78,-0.18],p <.01):短期:MD = -6.74,[95% CI -13.65,0.17],p = .06;中期:SMD = -2.26[95% CI -0.18],p = .01:SMD = -2.26 [95% CI -6.71, 2.20], p = .32)。与最小干预相比,移动医疗干预在减轻疼痛(短期:SMD = -1.16, [95% CI -1.70, -0.63],p < .001)和改善颈部残疾状况(短期:MD = -7.88, [95% CI -12.27, -3.13],p < .001)方面更为有效:结论:基于移动医疗的干预措施对慢性颈部疼痛患者的预测结果产生了积极影响,降低了疼痛程度,改善了颈部残疾状况。还需要进一步的研究来证明其在减少疼痛恐惧和提高生活质量方面的益处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pain Management Nursing
Pain Management Nursing 医学-护理
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
5.90%
发文量
187
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: This peer-reviewed journal offers a unique focus on the realm of pain management as it applies to nursing. Original and review articles from experts in the field offer key insights in the areas of clinical practice, advocacy, education, administration, and research. Additional features include practice guidelines and pharmacology updates.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信