Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Omalizumab Combined With Standard of Care in Treating Moderate to Severe Asthma Children in China.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q1 PEDIATRICS
Wang Cao, Yuncui Yu, Yue Xiao, Alec Morton, Huijie Huang, Jing Wei, Peng Guo
{"title":"Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Omalizumab Combined With Standard of Care in Treating Moderate to Severe Asthma Children in China.","authors":"Wang Cao, Yuncui Yu, Yue Xiao, Alec Morton, Huijie Huang, Jing Wei, Peng Guo","doi":"10.1002/ppul.71066","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>It has been recognized that adding omalizumab to standard of care (SOC) is a promising treatment for pediatric moderate to severe asthma patients in the Chinese setting, as shown by a previous multicenter retrospective study. Nevertheless, there is as yet no concrete evidence of its economic advantages. Several international studies conducted in different countries have shown varying results. The study is designed to better demonstrate the economic impact of omalizumab for Chinese children with asthma.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Based on consultation with physicians, a three-state Markov model was developed. The progress of asthma is modeling using the states \"no symptoms,\" \"secondary control, no asthmatic attack\" and \"asthmatic attack.\" To better reflect clinical treatment, exacerbation state was further divided into \"exacerbation with outpatient service\" and \"exacerbation with hospitalization.\" To understand the effects of treatment, the response rate of omalizumab was also modeled. The modeling cycle length was set at 1 week over a 5-year time horizon. Clinical effect and transition probabilities were sourced from published literature, while cost data were primarily obtained from local databases. Cost-effectiveness analysis was assessed from the health system perspective. One-way sensitivity analyses and scenario analysis were performed to ensure the robustness of the results. The willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold was set at 1 GDP/capital, as recommended by the national guidelines.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>It was shown that adding omalizumab to SOC treatment would increase both the total cost and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) over 5 years, with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of CNY 111,644.77/QALY, which is higher than the WTP threshold. Among the parameter variations, the two factors that altered the results were the proportion of hospitalizations in SOC therapy during asthma exacerbation and the weekly cost of omalizumab with full dose, which were both negatively correlated with the ICER. Scenario analysis, simulating the Medicare reimbursement conditions, reduced the ICER to an acceptable level.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Adding omalizumab to SOC treatment in pediatric moderate to severe asthma patients would be a cost-effective choice under the current medical insurance reimbursement policy in China.</p>","PeriodicalId":19932,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Pulmonology","volume":"60 4","pages":"e71066"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric Pulmonology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ppul.71066","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: It has been recognized that adding omalizumab to standard of care (SOC) is a promising treatment for pediatric moderate to severe asthma patients in the Chinese setting, as shown by a previous multicenter retrospective study. Nevertheless, there is as yet no concrete evidence of its economic advantages. Several international studies conducted in different countries have shown varying results. The study is designed to better demonstrate the economic impact of omalizumab for Chinese children with asthma.

Methods: Based on consultation with physicians, a three-state Markov model was developed. The progress of asthma is modeling using the states "no symptoms," "secondary control, no asthmatic attack" and "asthmatic attack." To better reflect clinical treatment, exacerbation state was further divided into "exacerbation with outpatient service" and "exacerbation with hospitalization." To understand the effects of treatment, the response rate of omalizumab was also modeled. The modeling cycle length was set at 1 week over a 5-year time horizon. Clinical effect and transition probabilities were sourced from published literature, while cost data were primarily obtained from local databases. Cost-effectiveness analysis was assessed from the health system perspective. One-way sensitivity analyses and scenario analysis were performed to ensure the robustness of the results. The willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold was set at 1 GDP/capital, as recommended by the national guidelines.

Results: It was shown that adding omalizumab to SOC treatment would increase both the total cost and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) over 5 years, with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of CNY 111,644.77/QALY, which is higher than the WTP threshold. Among the parameter variations, the two factors that altered the results were the proportion of hospitalizations in SOC therapy during asthma exacerbation and the weekly cost of omalizumab with full dose, which were both negatively correlated with the ICER. Scenario analysis, simulating the Medicare reimbursement conditions, reduced the ICER to an acceptable level.

Conclusions: Adding omalizumab to SOC treatment in pediatric moderate to severe asthma patients would be a cost-effective choice under the current medical insurance reimbursement policy in China.

奥玛珠单抗联合标准护理治疗中国中重度哮喘患儿的成本-效果分析
目的:先前的一项多中心回顾性研究表明,在中国,将omalizumab添加到标准治疗(SOC)中是一种有希望的治疗小儿中重度哮喘患者的方法。然而,目前还没有具体的证据表明它的经济优势。在不同国家进行的几项国际研究显示了不同的结果。该研究旨在更好地证明omalizumab对中国哮喘儿童的经济影响。方法:在咨询医师的基础上,建立三状态马尔可夫模型。哮喘的进展是使用状态“无症状”,“二次控制,无哮喘发作”和“哮喘发作”进行建模。为了更好地反映临床治疗情况,加重状态进一步分为“门诊加重”和“住院加重”。为了了解治疗效果,还对omalizumab的反应率进行了建模。建模周期长度设定为1周,时间跨度为5年。临床效果和转移概率来源于已发表的文献,而成本数据主要来自当地数据库。从卫生系统的角度评估了成本效益分析。为了确保结果的稳健性,进行了单向敏感性分析和情景分析。按照国家指导方针的建议,支付意愿(WTP)的门槛被设定为GDP/资本的1倍。结果:在SOC治疗中加入奥玛珠单抗,5年以上总成本和质量调整生命年(QALYs)均增加,增量成本-效果比(ICER)为111,644.77元/QALY,高于WTP阈值。在参数变化中,改变结果的两个因素是哮喘加重期间接受SOC治疗的住院比例和每周全剂量奥玛单抗的费用,这两个因素都与ICER负相关。模拟医疗保险报销条件的情景分析将ICER降低到可接受的水平。结论:在中国目前的医保报销政策下,在儿童中重度哮喘患者SOC治疗中加入omalizumab将是一个具有成本效益的选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pediatric Pulmonology
Pediatric Pulmonology 医学-呼吸系统
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
12.90%
发文量
468
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Pediatric Pulmonology (PPUL) is the foremost global journal studying the respiratory system in disease and in health as it develops from intrauterine life though adolescence to adulthood. Combining explicit and informative analysis of clinical as well as basic scientific research, PPUL provides a look at the many facets of respiratory system disorders in infants and children, ranging from pathological anatomy, developmental issues, and pathophysiology to infectious disease, asthma, cystic fibrosis, and airborne toxins. Focused attention is given to the reporting of diagnostic and therapeutic methods for neonates, preschool children, and adolescents, the enduring effects of childhood respiratory diseases, and newly described infectious diseases. PPUL concentrates on subject matters of crucial interest to specialists preparing for the Pediatric Subspecialty Examinations in the United States and other countries. With its attentive coverage and extensive clinical data, this journal is a principle source for pediatricians in practice and in training and a must have for all pediatric pulmonologists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信