Epidemiology of gall bladder cancer and its prevalence worldwide: a meta-analysis.

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q2 GENETICS & HEREDITY
Ali Afzal, Yan-Yan Liu, Amara Noureen, Amna Rehman, Mehreen Iftikhar, Hanan Afzal, Fareeha Azam, Umair Ali Khan Saddozai, Tayyba Jan, Zoya Asif, Lei Zhang, Xin-Ying Ji, Muhammad Babar Khawar
{"title":"Epidemiology of gall bladder cancer and its prevalence worldwide: a meta-analysis.","authors":"Ali Afzal, Yan-Yan Liu, Amara Noureen, Amna Rehman, Mehreen Iftikhar, Hanan Afzal, Fareeha Azam, Umair Ali Khan Saddozai, Tayyba Jan, Zoya Asif, Lei Zhang, Xin-Ying Ji, Muhammad Babar Khawar","doi":"10.1186/s13023-025-03652-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Gallbladder carcinoma (GBC) accounts for 1.3% of cancer incidence and 1.7% of cancer-related deaths which emphasizes the need for comprehensive research in epidemiological trends.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>We aim to address this gap by investigating global prevalence trends across various regions, age groups, risk factors and cancer stages.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A meta-analysis of studies retrieved from Google Scholar, PubMed and Web of Science, reporting prevalence of GBC was conducted using a predetermined screening criterion. Meta Regression and Egger's Regression-based tests were employed to assess heterogeneity and publication bias, respectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified three types of studies (n = 20), primarily originating from Asia (n = 10) over a cumulative time period of 24 years (1988-2012). The pooled analysis revealed a statistically significant GBC prevalence of 20.3 ± 5.2% (95% CI 9.3-31.3%, p = 0.001) among at-risk populations, including those with gallstones or cholecystitis. Analysis of potential publication bias showed none, nevertheless, individual parameters indicated varying significance. Subgroup analyses highlighted regional, temporal, and demographic variations, emphasizing the influence of factors like sample size and age on GBC prevalence. Correlation analysis demonstrated strong positive associations with sample size (p < 0.01), gender distribution (male: r = 0.85, p < 0.01, female: r = 0.806, p < 0.01), and prevalence rates (r = 0.98, p = 0.04).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite of less data present, our comprehensive overview of prevalence, regional variations, and demographic associations serves as a crucial starting point for future targeted investigations. The study fulfills a gap in epidemiology of GBC and emphasizes the need for increased attention and provides a pioneering arena in future.</p>","PeriodicalId":19651,"journal":{"name":"Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases","volume":"20 1","pages":"143"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11948642/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13023-025-03652-0","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Gallbladder carcinoma (GBC) accounts for 1.3% of cancer incidence and 1.7% of cancer-related deaths which emphasizes the need for comprehensive research in epidemiological trends.

Aim: We aim to address this gap by investigating global prevalence trends across various regions, age groups, risk factors and cancer stages.

Methods: A meta-analysis of studies retrieved from Google Scholar, PubMed and Web of Science, reporting prevalence of GBC was conducted using a predetermined screening criterion. Meta Regression and Egger's Regression-based tests were employed to assess heterogeneity and publication bias, respectively.

Results: We identified three types of studies (n = 20), primarily originating from Asia (n = 10) over a cumulative time period of 24 years (1988-2012). The pooled analysis revealed a statistically significant GBC prevalence of 20.3 ± 5.2% (95% CI 9.3-31.3%, p = 0.001) among at-risk populations, including those with gallstones or cholecystitis. Analysis of potential publication bias showed none, nevertheless, individual parameters indicated varying significance. Subgroup analyses highlighted regional, temporal, and demographic variations, emphasizing the influence of factors like sample size and age on GBC prevalence. Correlation analysis demonstrated strong positive associations with sample size (p < 0.01), gender distribution (male: r = 0.85, p < 0.01, female: r = 0.806, p < 0.01), and prevalence rates (r = 0.98, p = 0.04).

Conclusion: Despite of less data present, our comprehensive overview of prevalence, regional variations, and demographic associations serves as a crucial starting point for future targeted investigations. The study fulfills a gap in epidemiology of GBC and emphasizes the need for increased attention and provides a pioneering arena in future.

胆囊癌的流行病学及其全球患病率:一项荟萃分析。
背景:胆囊癌(GBC)占癌症发病率的1.3%和癌症相关死亡的1.7%,这强调了对流行病学趋势进行综合研究的必要性。目的:我们的目标是通过调查不同地区、年龄组、危险因素和癌症阶段的全球流行趋势来解决这一差距。方法:采用预先确定的筛选标准,对谷歌Scholar、PubMed和Web of Science上报告GBC患病率的研究进行荟萃分析。分别采用Meta回归和Egger’s回归检验来评估异质性和发表偏倚。结果:我们确定了三种类型的研究(n = 20),主要来自亚洲(n = 10),累积时间为24年(1988-2012)。合并分析显示,包括胆结石或胆囊炎患者在内的高危人群中,GBC患病率为20.3±5.2% (95% CI 9.3-31.3%, p = 0.001),具有统计学意义。分析潜在的发表偏倚没有发现,然而,个别参数显示不同的显著性。亚组分析强调区域、时间和人口统计学差异,强调样本量和年龄等因素对GBC患病率的影响。结论:尽管目前的数据较少,但我们对患病率、地区差异和人口统计学关联的全面概述可以作为未来有针对性调查的关键起点。该研究填补了GBC流行病学的空白,强调了需要增加关注,并为未来提供了一个开创性的领域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases 医学-医学:研究与实验
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
8.10%
发文量
418
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that encompasses all aspects of rare diseases and orphan drugs. The journal publishes high-quality reviews on specific rare diseases. In addition, the journal may consider articles on clinical trial outcome reports, either positive or negative, and articles on public health issues in the field of rare diseases and orphan drugs. The journal does not accept case reports.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信