Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections in Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices: Insights from a Retrospective Analysis of Multidrug-Resistant and Non-Multidrug-Resistant Isolates.

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q2 MICROBIOLOGY
Georgios Schinas, Rafail Koros, Ioannis Ntalakouras, Skevos Sideris, Angelos Perperis, Georgios Leventopoulos, Periklis Davlouros, Karolina Akinosoglou
{"title":"Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections in Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices: Insights from a Retrospective Analysis of Multidrug-Resistant and Non-Multidrug-Resistant Isolates.","authors":"Georgios Schinas, Rafail Koros, Ioannis Ntalakouras, Skevos Sideris, Angelos Perperis, Georgios Leventopoulos, Periklis Davlouros, Karolina Akinosoglou","doi":"10.3390/pathogens14030215","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) infections caused by Gram-negative bacteria are uncommon but potentially life-threatening. This study examined patients with Gram-negative CIED infections, investigating the clinical characteristics of patients harboring multidrug-resistant (MDR), versus non-MDR, isolates. A retrospective observational analysis was conducted at two tertiary Greek University Hospitals from 2015 to 2020. Patients were identified through microbiological cultures from device-related sites (pocket, lead, generator), with infections classified as MDR or non-MDR based on antimicrobial susceptibility profiles. Comprehensive data were collected, including demographic characteristics, clinical parameters, procedural details-on both the last device procedure and subsequent extraction procedure-infection-related findings, and microbiological profiles. In total, 18 patients were identified, with an equal distribution of 9 MDR and 9 non-MDR cases. The study population had a median age of 78 years, with 33.3% female patients, and a median Charlson Comorbidity Index of four. <i>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</i> was the most prevalent isolated species. Comparative analysis revealed that MDR patients had higher median SOFA (Sequential Organ Failure Assessment) scores (2 vs. 0, <i>p</i> = 0.07), longer time to device extraction (50% vs. 88.9% extracted within one month, <i>p</i> = 0.079), and higher blood culture positivity (80% vs. 37.5%, <i>p</i> = 0.135). Despite similar demographic characteristics, MDR infections demonstrated more complex clinical profiles, with a trend towards increased disease severity.</p>","PeriodicalId":19758,"journal":{"name":"Pathogens","volume":"14 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11944461/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pathogens","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens14030215","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) infections caused by Gram-negative bacteria are uncommon but potentially life-threatening. This study examined patients with Gram-negative CIED infections, investigating the clinical characteristics of patients harboring multidrug-resistant (MDR), versus non-MDR, isolates. A retrospective observational analysis was conducted at two tertiary Greek University Hospitals from 2015 to 2020. Patients were identified through microbiological cultures from device-related sites (pocket, lead, generator), with infections classified as MDR or non-MDR based on antimicrobial susceptibility profiles. Comprehensive data were collected, including demographic characteristics, clinical parameters, procedural details-on both the last device procedure and subsequent extraction procedure-infection-related findings, and microbiological profiles. In total, 18 patients were identified, with an equal distribution of 9 MDR and 9 non-MDR cases. The study population had a median age of 78 years, with 33.3% female patients, and a median Charlson Comorbidity Index of four. Pseudomonas aeruginosa was the most prevalent isolated species. Comparative analysis revealed that MDR patients had higher median SOFA (Sequential Organ Failure Assessment) scores (2 vs. 0, p = 0.07), longer time to device extraction (50% vs. 88.9% extracted within one month, p = 0.079), and higher blood culture positivity (80% vs. 37.5%, p = 0.135). Despite similar demographic characteristics, MDR infections demonstrated more complex clinical profiles, with a trend towards increased disease severity.

心脏植入式电子装置中的革兰氏阴性细菌感染:来自多药耐药和非多药耐药分离株的回顾性分析。
由革兰氏阴性菌引起的心脏植入式电子装置(CIED)感染并不常见,但可能危及生命。本研究检查了革兰氏阴性CIED感染患者,调查了多药耐药(MDR)与非MDR分离株患者的临床特征。2015年至2020年在两所希腊大学三级医院进行回顾性观察分析。通过设备相关部位(口袋、铅、发生器)的微生物培养确定患者,根据抗菌药物敏感性将感染分类为耐多药或非耐多药。收集了全面的数据,包括人口统计学特征、临床参数、手术细节(包括最后一次器械手术和随后的取出手术)、感染相关发现和微生物谱。共发现18例患者,平均分布为9例耐多药和9例非耐多药。研究人群的中位年龄为78岁,女性患者占33.3%,Charlson合并症指数中位数为4。铜绿假单胞菌是最常见的分离种。对比分析显示,MDR患者的中位SOFA(序贯器官衰竭评估)评分较高(2比0,p = 0.07),取出器械的时间较长(50%比88.9%在1个月内取出,p = 0.079),血培养阳性较高(80%比37.5%,p = 0.135)。尽管具有相似的人口统计学特征,耐多药感染表现出更复杂的临床特征,并有疾病严重程度增加的趋势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pathogens
Pathogens Medicine-Immunology and Allergy
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
8.10%
发文量
1285
审稿时长
17.75 days
期刊介绍: Pathogens (ISSN 2076-0817) publishes reviews, regular research papers and short notes on all aspects of pathogens and pathogen-host interactions. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical research in as much detail as possible. Full experimental and/or methodical details must be provided for research articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信