Development and validation of a brief form of the "Weight Control/Blame" subscale of the Antifat Attitudes Test (AFAT).

IF 3.9 3区 医学 Q2 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Obesity Facts Pub Date : 2025-03-26 DOI:10.1159/000545380
Julia Petersen, Bjarne Schmalbach, Elmar Brähler, Oliver Decker, Anja Hilbert
{"title":"Development and validation of a brief form of the \"Weight Control/Blame\" subscale of the Antifat Attitudes Test (AFAT).","authors":"Julia Petersen, Bjarne Schmalbach, Elmar Brähler, Oliver Decker, Anja Hilbert","doi":"10.1159/000545380","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Weight Control/Blame (WCB) subscale of the Antifat Attitudes Test (AFAT) measures weight stigma, particularly beliefs linking obesity to personal responsibility, which contributes to discrimination and negative psychological, often reinforced by political ideologies and authoritarian attitudes.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study sought to (1) develop and validate an economic version of the WCB subscale, and (2) evaluate associations between weight stigmatizing attitudes, authoritarian beliefs, sexist attitudes, and conspiracy mentality.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A four-item short form of the WCB subscale (WCB-4) was developed using a representative sample of the German population (N = 1,000) and validated on a second sample (N = 2,524). We assessed psychometric properties, convergent and divergent validity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The four-item solution demonstrated good internal consistency (ω = .807) and favorable confirmatory factor analysis results. Weight stigma positively correlated with authoritarian and sexist beliefs, and negatively with depression, anxiety, and body mass index.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The WCB-4 is a reliable and valid tool for assessing weight stigma in epidemiological research. It highlighted positive associations with authoritarian beliefs and sexist attitudes, reflecting an interconnected system of biases against marginalized groups. Though a minor correlation was found between conspiracy mentality and authoritarian beliefs, no significant link emerged between conspiracy mentality and weight stigma.</p>","PeriodicalId":19414,"journal":{"name":"Obesity Facts","volume":" ","pages":"1-17"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Obesity Facts","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000545380","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The Weight Control/Blame (WCB) subscale of the Antifat Attitudes Test (AFAT) measures weight stigma, particularly beliefs linking obesity to personal responsibility, which contributes to discrimination and negative psychological, often reinforced by political ideologies and authoritarian attitudes.

Objective: This study sought to (1) develop and validate an economic version of the WCB subscale, and (2) evaluate associations between weight stigmatizing attitudes, authoritarian beliefs, sexist attitudes, and conspiracy mentality.

Method: A four-item short form of the WCB subscale (WCB-4) was developed using a representative sample of the German population (N = 1,000) and validated on a second sample (N = 2,524). We assessed psychometric properties, convergent and divergent validity.

Results: The four-item solution demonstrated good internal consistency (ω = .807) and favorable confirmatory factor analysis results. Weight stigma positively correlated with authoritarian and sexist beliefs, and negatively with depression, anxiety, and body mass index.

Discussion: The WCB-4 is a reliable and valid tool for assessing weight stigma in epidemiological research. It highlighted positive associations with authoritarian beliefs and sexist attitudes, reflecting an interconnected system of biases against marginalized groups. Though a minor correlation was found between conspiracy mentality and authoritarian beliefs, no significant link emerged between conspiracy mentality and weight stigma.

反肥胖态度测试(AFAT)中“体重控制/责备”分量表的简要形式的开发和验证。
背景:反肥胖态度测试(AFAT)的体重控制/责备(WCB)子量表测量体重污名,特别是将肥胖与个人责任联系起来的信念,这会导致歧视和负面心理,往往被政治意识形态和专制态度所强化。目的:本研究试图(1)开发并验证WCB子量表的经济版本,以及(2)评估体重污名化态度、权威信仰、性别歧视态度和阴谋心理之间的关系。方法:使用德国人口的代表性样本(N = 1,000)开发了一个四项简短形式的WCB分量表(WCB-4),并在第二个样本(N = 2,524)上进行了验证。我们评估了心理测量特性、收敛效度和发散效度。结果:四项溶液具有良好的内部一致性(ω = .807),验证性因子分析结果良好。体重耻辱感与权威主义和性别歧视信仰呈正相关,与抑郁、焦虑和体重指数呈负相关。讨论:WCB-4是流行病学研究中评估体重病耻感的可靠有效工具。它强调了与专制信仰和性别歧视态度的积极联系,反映了对边缘群体的相互关联的偏见系统。虽然阴谋心理和权威信仰之间有轻微的相关性,但阴谋心理和体重耻辱感之间没有明显的联系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Obesity Facts
Obesity Facts 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
5.60%
发文量
77
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: ''Obesity Facts'' publishes articles covering all aspects of obesity, in particular epidemiology, etiology and pathogenesis, treatment, and the prevention of adiposity. As obesity is related to many disease processes, the journal is also dedicated to all topics pertaining to comorbidity and covers psychological and sociocultural aspects as well as influences of nutrition and exercise on body weight. The editors carefully select papers to present only the most recent findings in clinical practice and research. All professionals concerned with obesity issues will find this journal a most valuable update to keep them abreast of the latest scientific developments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信