Development and validation of a brief form of the "Weight Control/Blame" subscale of the Antifat Attitudes Test (AFAT).

IF 3.9 3区 医学 Q2 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Obesity Facts Pub Date : 2025-03-26 DOI:10.1159/000545380
Julia Petersen, Bjarne Schmalbach, Elmar Brähler, Oliver Decker, Anja Hilbert
{"title":"Development and validation of a brief form of the \"Weight Control/Blame\" subscale of the Antifat Attitudes Test (AFAT).","authors":"Julia Petersen, Bjarne Schmalbach, Elmar Brähler, Oliver Decker, Anja Hilbert","doi":"10.1159/000545380","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Weight Control/Blame (WCB) subscale of the Antifat Attitudes Test (AFAT) measures weight stigma, particularly beliefs linking obesity to personal responsibility, which contributes to discrimination and negative psychological, often reinforced by political ideologies and authoritarian attitudes.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study sought to (1) develop and validate an economic version of the WCB subscale, and (2) evaluate associations between weight stigmatizing attitudes, authoritarian beliefs, sexist attitudes, and conspiracy mentality.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A four-item short form of the WCB subscale (WCB-4) was developed using a representative sample of the German population (N = 1,000) and validated on a second sample (N = 2,524). We assessed psychometric properties, convergent and divergent validity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The four-item solution demonstrated good internal consistency (ω = .807) and favorable confirmatory factor analysis results. Weight stigma positively correlated with authoritarian and sexist beliefs, and negatively with depression, anxiety, and body mass index.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The WCB-4 is a reliable and valid tool for assessing weight stigma in epidemiological research. It highlighted positive associations with authoritarian beliefs and sexist attitudes, reflecting an interconnected system of biases against marginalized groups. Though a minor correlation was found between conspiracy mentality and authoritarian beliefs, no significant link emerged between conspiracy mentality and weight stigma.</p>","PeriodicalId":19414,"journal":{"name":"Obesity Facts","volume":" ","pages":"1-17"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Obesity Facts","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000545380","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The Weight Control/Blame (WCB) subscale of the Antifat Attitudes Test (AFAT) measures weight stigma, particularly beliefs linking obesity to personal responsibility, which contributes to discrimination and negative psychological, often reinforced by political ideologies and authoritarian attitudes.

Objective: This study sought to (1) develop and validate an economic version of the WCB subscale, and (2) evaluate associations between weight stigmatizing attitudes, authoritarian beliefs, sexist attitudes, and conspiracy mentality.

Method: A four-item short form of the WCB subscale (WCB-4) was developed using a representative sample of the German population (N = 1,000) and validated on a second sample (N = 2,524). We assessed psychometric properties, convergent and divergent validity.

Results: The four-item solution demonstrated good internal consistency (ω = .807) and favorable confirmatory factor analysis results. Weight stigma positively correlated with authoritarian and sexist beliefs, and negatively with depression, anxiety, and body mass index.

Discussion: The WCB-4 is a reliable and valid tool for assessing weight stigma in epidemiological research. It highlighted positive associations with authoritarian beliefs and sexist attitudes, reflecting an interconnected system of biases against marginalized groups. Though a minor correlation was found between conspiracy mentality and authoritarian beliefs, no significant link emerged between conspiracy mentality and weight stigma.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Obesity Facts
Obesity Facts 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
5.60%
发文量
77
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: ''Obesity Facts'' publishes articles covering all aspects of obesity, in particular epidemiology, etiology and pathogenesis, treatment, and the prevention of adiposity. As obesity is related to many disease processes, the journal is also dedicated to all topics pertaining to comorbidity and covers psychological and sociocultural aspects as well as influences of nutrition and exercise on body weight. The editors carefully select papers to present only the most recent findings in clinical practice and research. All professionals concerned with obesity issues will find this journal a most valuable update to keep them abreast of the latest scientific developments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信