Deep Learning-Accelerated Non-Contrast Abbreviated Liver MRI for Detecting Malignant Focal Hepatic Lesions: Dual-Center Validation.

IF 4.4 2区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
So Hyun Park, Moon Hyung Choi, Bohyun Kim, Hyun-Soo Lee, Sungjin Yoon, Young Joon Lee, Dominik Nickel, Thomas Benkert
{"title":"Deep Learning-Accelerated Non-Contrast Abbreviated Liver MRI for Detecting Malignant Focal Hepatic Lesions: Dual-Center Validation.","authors":"So Hyun Park, Moon Hyung Choi, Bohyun Kim, Hyun-Soo Lee, Sungjin Yoon, Young Joon Lee, Dominik Nickel, Thomas Benkert","doi":"10.3348/kjr.2024.0862","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare a deep learning (DL)-accelerated non-enhanced abbreviated MRI (AMRI<sub>DL</sub>) protocol with standard AMRI (AMRI<sub>STD</sub>) of the liver in terms of image quality and malignant focal lesion detection.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This retrospective study included 155 consecutive patients (110 male; mean age 62.4 ± 11 years) from two sites who underwent standard liver MRI and additional AMRI<sub>DL</sub> sequences, specifically DL-accelerated single-shot fast-spin echo (SSFSE<sub>DL</sub>) and DL-accelerated diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI<sub>DL</sub>). Additional MRI phantom experiments assessed signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values. Three reviewers evaluated AMRI<sub>DL</sub> and AMRI<sub>STD</sub> protocols for image quality using a five-point Likert scale and identified malignant hepatic lesions. Image quality scores and per-lesion sensitivities were compared between AMRI<sub>DL</sub> and AMRI<sub>STD</sub> using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test and logistic regression with generalized estimating equations, respectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Phantom experiments demonstrated comparable SNR and higher CNR for SSFSE<sub>DL</sub> compared to SSFSE<sub>STD</sub>, with similar ADC values for DWI<sub>DL</sub> and DWI<sub>STD</sub>. Among the 155 patients, 130 (83.9%) had chronic liver disease or a history of intra- or extrahepatic malignancy. Of 104 malignant focal lesions in 64 patients, 58 (55.8%) were hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs), 38 (36.5%) were metastases, four (3.8%) were cholangiocarcinomas, and four (3.8%) were lymphomas. The pooled per-lesion sensitivity across three readers was 97.6% for AMRI<sub>DL</sub>, comparable to 97.6% for AMRI<sub>STD</sub>. Compared with AMRI<sub>STD</sub>, AMRI<sub>DL</sub> demonstrated superior image quality regarding structural sharpness, artifacts, and noise (all <i>P</i> < 0.001) and reduced the average scan time by approximately 50% (2 min 29 sec vs. 4 min 11 sec). In patients with chronic liver disease, AMRI<sub>DL</sub> achieved a 96.6% per-lesion sensitivity for HCC detection, similar to 96.5% for AMRI<sub>STD</sub> (<i>P</i> > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The AMRI<sub>DL</sub> protocol offers comparable sensitivity for detecting malignant focal lesions, including HCC while significantly enhancing image quality and reducing scan time by approximately 50% compared to AMRI<sub>STD</sub>.</p>","PeriodicalId":17881,"journal":{"name":"Korean Journal of Radiology","volume":"26 4","pages":"333-345"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11955387/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korean Journal of Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2024.0862","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To compare a deep learning (DL)-accelerated non-enhanced abbreviated MRI (AMRIDL) protocol with standard AMRI (AMRISTD) of the liver in terms of image quality and malignant focal lesion detection.

Materials and methods: This retrospective study included 155 consecutive patients (110 male; mean age 62.4 ± 11 years) from two sites who underwent standard liver MRI and additional AMRIDL sequences, specifically DL-accelerated single-shot fast-spin echo (SSFSEDL) and DL-accelerated diffusion-weighted imaging (DWIDL). Additional MRI phantom experiments assessed signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values. Three reviewers evaluated AMRIDL and AMRISTD protocols for image quality using a five-point Likert scale and identified malignant hepatic lesions. Image quality scores and per-lesion sensitivities were compared between AMRIDL and AMRISTD using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test and logistic regression with generalized estimating equations, respectively.

Results: Phantom experiments demonstrated comparable SNR and higher CNR for SSFSEDL compared to SSFSESTD, with similar ADC values for DWIDL and DWISTD. Among the 155 patients, 130 (83.9%) had chronic liver disease or a history of intra- or extrahepatic malignancy. Of 104 malignant focal lesions in 64 patients, 58 (55.8%) were hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs), 38 (36.5%) were metastases, four (3.8%) were cholangiocarcinomas, and four (3.8%) were lymphomas. The pooled per-lesion sensitivity across three readers was 97.6% for AMRIDL, comparable to 97.6% for AMRISTD. Compared with AMRISTD, AMRIDL demonstrated superior image quality regarding structural sharpness, artifacts, and noise (all P < 0.001) and reduced the average scan time by approximately 50% (2 min 29 sec vs. 4 min 11 sec). In patients with chronic liver disease, AMRIDL achieved a 96.6% per-lesion sensitivity for HCC detection, similar to 96.5% for AMRISTD (P > 0.05).

Conclusion: The AMRIDL protocol offers comparable sensitivity for detecting malignant focal lesions, including HCC while significantly enhancing image quality and reducing scan time by approximately 50% compared to AMRISTD.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Korean Journal of Radiology
Korean Journal of Radiology 医学-核医学
CiteScore
10.60
自引率
12.50%
发文量
141
审稿时长
1.3 months
期刊介绍: The inaugural issue of the Korean J Radiol came out in March 2000. Our journal aims to produce and propagate knowledge on radiologic imaging and related sciences. A unique feature of the articles published in the Journal will be their reflection of global trends in radiology combined with an East-Asian perspective. Geographic differences in disease prevalence will be reflected in the contents of papers, and this will serve to enrich our body of knowledge. World''s outstanding radiologists from many countries are serving as editorial board of our journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信