CT Scans Understage Lymph Nodes in Gastric and Gastroesophageal Adenocarcinoma.

IF 2 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Morgan F Pettigrew, Priya Kumar, Skylar L Nahi, Scott I Reznik, Suntrea T G Hammer, Matthew R Porembka, Sam C Wang
{"title":"CT Scans Understage Lymph Nodes in Gastric and Gastroesophageal Adenocarcinoma.","authors":"Morgan F Pettigrew, Priya Kumar, Skylar L Nahi, Scott I Reznik, Suntrea T G Hammer, Matthew R Porembka, Sam C Wang","doi":"10.1002/jso.28112","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>The presence of lymph node metastases in patients with gastric and gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) adenocarcinoma provides prognostic information and guides treatment decisions. We sought to determine the sensitivity of computed tomography (CT) imaging for clinical nodal staging in patients with resectable gastric and GEJ adenocarcinoma and determine a lymph node size cut-off to optimize diagnostic accuracy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a retrospective review of patients who underwent curative-intent resection for gastric or GEJ adenocarcinoma at our institution between 2010 and 2023. We reviewed CT scan images performed immediately before resection and measured lymph nodes in the short axis to identify patients with lymph nodes larger than the radiologic upper limit of normal. We compared histopathologic data from resection specimens to CT scans to determine pathologic concordance for metastatic involvement of lymph nodes and calculated the sensitivity and specificity of CT scans to identify nodal metastases. We used the largest lymph node measurement from each scan to construct a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and calculated Youden's J Index to determine the optimal lymph node size cut-off.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 192 consecutive patients who underwent resection during the study period and had preoperative CT scans available for review. 72 patients (38%) had diffuse or mixed type tumors, and 85 patients (44%) had intestinal-type tumors. 157 patients (82%) underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy or chemoradiation. 110 patients (57%) had pathologic node-positive disease and in this cohort, 27 patients (25%) had lymph nodes deemed radiographically enlarged. The sensitivity of preoperative CT scans for nodal metastases was 25%, and specificity was 83%. Based on the ROC curve, an optimal lymph node size cutoff of 6.5 mm was identified. At this cutoff, the estimated sensitivity was 47%, and the estimated specificity was 72%. When patients were stratified by Lauren histology, the AUC for intestinal-type tumors was significantly better than for diffuse or mixed-type tumors (p = 0.02). The area under the ROC curve for patients with diffuse or mixed type tumors was 0.51 indicating lymph node size on CT scan was no better than random chance for diagnosis of lymph node metastases.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>CT scans are not sensitive to identify nodal metastases in gastric and GEJ adenocarcinoma using current radiologic guidelines. While a lower lymph node size cutoff may improve sensitivity, this does not benefit patients with diffuse or mixed-type tumors. Since CT scans understage a large proportion of patients with gastric and GEJ cancers, techniques to improve clinical nodal staging in this population are needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":17111,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Surgical Oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Surgical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.28112","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives: The presence of lymph node metastases in patients with gastric and gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) adenocarcinoma provides prognostic information and guides treatment decisions. We sought to determine the sensitivity of computed tomography (CT) imaging for clinical nodal staging in patients with resectable gastric and GEJ adenocarcinoma and determine a lymph node size cut-off to optimize diagnostic accuracy.

Methods: We performed a retrospective review of patients who underwent curative-intent resection for gastric or GEJ adenocarcinoma at our institution between 2010 and 2023. We reviewed CT scan images performed immediately before resection and measured lymph nodes in the short axis to identify patients with lymph nodes larger than the radiologic upper limit of normal. We compared histopathologic data from resection specimens to CT scans to determine pathologic concordance for metastatic involvement of lymph nodes and calculated the sensitivity and specificity of CT scans to identify nodal metastases. We used the largest lymph node measurement from each scan to construct a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and calculated Youden's J Index to determine the optimal lymph node size cut-off.

Results: We identified 192 consecutive patients who underwent resection during the study period and had preoperative CT scans available for review. 72 patients (38%) had diffuse or mixed type tumors, and 85 patients (44%) had intestinal-type tumors. 157 patients (82%) underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy or chemoradiation. 110 patients (57%) had pathologic node-positive disease and in this cohort, 27 patients (25%) had lymph nodes deemed radiographically enlarged. The sensitivity of preoperative CT scans for nodal metastases was 25%, and specificity was 83%. Based on the ROC curve, an optimal lymph node size cutoff of 6.5 mm was identified. At this cutoff, the estimated sensitivity was 47%, and the estimated specificity was 72%. When patients were stratified by Lauren histology, the AUC for intestinal-type tumors was significantly better than for diffuse or mixed-type tumors (p = 0.02). The area under the ROC curve for patients with diffuse or mixed type tumors was 0.51 indicating lymph node size on CT scan was no better than random chance for diagnosis of lymph node metastases.

Conclusions: CT scans are not sensitive to identify nodal metastases in gastric and GEJ adenocarcinoma using current radiologic guidelines. While a lower lymph node size cutoff may improve sensitivity, this does not benefit patients with diffuse or mixed-type tumors. Since CT scans understage a large proportion of patients with gastric and GEJ cancers, techniques to improve clinical nodal staging in this population are needed.

CT扫描胃及胃食管腺癌淋巴结。
背景和目的:胃和胃食管交界处(GEJ)腺癌患者淋巴结转移的存在提供了预后信息和指导治疗决策。我们试图确定计算机断层扫描(CT)成像对可切除胃腺癌和胃腺癌患者临床淋巴结分期的敏感性,并确定淋巴结大小截止值以优化诊断准确性。方法:我们对2010年至2023年间在我们机构接受治疗意图切除的胃或GEJ腺癌患者进行了回顾性研究。我们回顾了切除前立即进行的CT扫描图像,并在短轴上测量淋巴结,以识别淋巴结大于正常放射上限的患者。我们将切除标本的组织病理学数据与CT扫描进行比较,以确定淋巴结转移累及的病理一致性,并计算CT扫描识别淋巴结转移的敏感性和特异性。我们使用每次扫描的最大淋巴结测量值来构建受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线,并计算约登J指数来确定最佳淋巴结大小截止值。结果:我们确定了192例在研究期间连续接受切除的患者,并有术前CT扫描可用于回顾。弥漫性或混合性肿瘤72例(38%),肠型肿瘤85例(44%)。157例(82%)患者接受了新辅助化疗或放化疗。110名患者(57%)患有病理性淋巴结阳性疾病,在该队列中,27名患者(25%)的淋巴结经x线检查肿大。术前CT扫描对淋巴结转移的敏感性为25%,特异性为83%。根据ROC曲线,确定最佳淋巴结大小临界值为6.5 mm。在此截止点,估计敏感性为47%,估计特异性为72%。以Lauren组织学对患者进行分层时,肠型肿瘤的AUC明显优于弥漫性或混合型肿瘤(p = 0.02)。弥漫性或混合型肿瘤患者的ROC曲线下面积为0.51,表明CT扫描淋巴结大小不优于随机诊断淋巴结转移的机会。结论:根据目前的放射学指南,CT扫描对识别胃和胃j腺癌的淋巴结转移并不敏感。虽然较小的淋巴结大小切除可能改善敏感性,但这对弥漫性或混合型肿瘤患者没有好处。由于CT扫描在很大比例的胃癌和胃癌患者中处于分期阶段,因此需要改善这一人群的临床淋巴结分期的技术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
4.00%
发文量
367
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Surgical Oncology offers peer-reviewed, original papers in the field of surgical oncology and broadly related surgical sciences, including reports on experimental and laboratory studies. As an international journal, the editors encourage participation from leading surgeons around the world. The JSO is the representative journal for the World Federation of Surgical Oncology Societies. Publishing 16 issues in 2 volumes each year, the journal accepts Research Articles, in-depth Reviews of timely interest, Letters to the Editor, and invited Editorials. Guest Editors from the JSO Editorial Board oversee multiple special Seminars issues each year. These Seminars include multifaceted Reviews on a particular topic or current issue in surgical oncology, which are invited from experts in the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信