Criterion-related validity and reliability of the 6-minute walk test in adults according to sex, age and physical activity level: The ADULT-FIT project.

IF 2.3 2区 医学 Q2 SPORT SCIENCES
José Castro-Piñero, Nuria Marín-Jiménez, Alejandro Perez-Bey, José Jiménez-Iglesias, Alberto Grao-Cruces, Inmaculada C Alvarez-Gallardo, Magdalena Cuenca-García
{"title":"Criterion-related validity and reliability of the 6-minute walk test in adults according to sex, age and physical activity level: The ADULT-FIT project.","authors":"José Castro-Piñero, Nuria Marín-Jiménez, Alejandro Perez-Bey, José Jiménez-Iglesias, Alberto Grao-Cruces, Inmaculada C Alvarez-Gallardo, Magdalena Cuenca-García","doi":"10.1080/02640414.2025.2481361","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aimed to analyse the criterion-related validity and reliability of the 6-minute walk test (6MWT) to assess cardiorespiratory fitness in the adult population, according to sex, age and physical activity level. Sociodemographic and anthropometric measurements, a treadmill maximal test, and the 6MWT were performed on 410 adults aged 18-64 years. Measured VO2max was associated with the total distance in the 6MWT and estimated VO2max by Burr's and Manttari's equations (R2 = 0.35, 0.61 and 0.61, respectively, all p < 0.01; SEE = 6.564-5.089 ml* kg-1 * min-1, %SEE = 11.80-15.30). The stepwise linear regression analysis showed that the total distance in the 6MWT, sex, age, physical activity level and body fat mass (%) explained 75% variance of measured VO2max (SEE = 4.203 ml* kg-1 * min-1, %SEE = 9.78, p < 0.001). The systematic error in the total distance in the 6MWT was 0.87-m (p < 0.001). The ICC showed excellent agreement (0.99, p < 0.001), with low error values and most of the MCD95 close to 0.</p>","PeriodicalId":17066,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Sports Sciences","volume":" ","pages":"1-13"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Sports Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2025.2481361","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aimed to analyse the criterion-related validity and reliability of the 6-minute walk test (6MWT) to assess cardiorespiratory fitness in the adult population, according to sex, age and physical activity level. Sociodemographic and anthropometric measurements, a treadmill maximal test, and the 6MWT were performed on 410 adults aged 18-64 years. Measured VO2max was associated with the total distance in the 6MWT and estimated VO2max by Burr's and Manttari's equations (R2 = 0.35, 0.61 and 0.61, respectively, all p < 0.01; SEE = 6.564-5.089 ml* kg-1 * min-1, %SEE = 11.80-15.30). The stepwise linear regression analysis showed that the total distance in the 6MWT, sex, age, physical activity level and body fat mass (%) explained 75% variance of measured VO2max (SEE = 4.203 ml* kg-1 * min-1, %SEE = 9.78, p < 0.001). The systematic error in the total distance in the 6MWT was 0.87-m (p < 0.001). The ICC showed excellent agreement (0.99, p < 0.001), with low error values and most of the MCD95 close to 0.

根据性别、年龄和体力活动水平对成人进行的 6 分钟步行测试的标准相关有效性和可靠性:ADULT-FIT项目。
本研究旨在分析6分钟步行测试(6MWT)在成人中评估心肺健康的效度和信度,根据性别、年龄和身体活动水平。对410名年龄在18-64岁的成年人进行了社会人口学和人体测量,跑步机最大测试和6MWT。测得的VO2max与6MWT的总距离和通过Burr’s和Manttari’s方程估计的VO2max相关(R2分别为0.35、0.61和0.61,p均< 0.01;SEE = 6.564-5.089 ml* kg-1 * min-1, %SEE = 11.80-15.30)。逐步线性回归分析表明,6MWT总距离、性别、年龄、体力活动水平和体脂质量(%)解释了测量VO2max方差的75% (SEE = 4.203 ml* kg-1 * min-1, %SEE = 9.78, p < 0.001)。6MWT总距离的系统误差为0.87 m (p < 0.001)。ICC显示出极好的一致性(0.99,p < 0.001),误差值低,大多数MCD95接近于0。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Sports Sciences
Journal of Sports Sciences 社会科学-运动科学
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
2.90%
发文量
147
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Sports Sciences has an international reputation for publishing articles of a high standard and is both Medline and Clarivate Analytics-listed. It publishes research on various aspects of the sports and exercise sciences, including anatomy, biochemistry, biomechanics, performance analysis, physiology, psychology, sports medicine and health, as well as coaching and talent identification, kinanthropometry and other interdisciplinary perspectives. The emphasis of the Journal is on the human sciences, broadly defined and applied to sport and exercise. Besides experimental work in human responses to exercise, the subjects covered will include human responses to technologies such as the design of sports equipment and playing facilities, research in training, selection, performance prediction or modification, and stress reduction or manifestation. Manuscripts considered for publication include those dealing with original investigations of exercise, validation of technological innovations in sport or comprehensive reviews of topics relevant to the scientific study of sport.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信