Size and Morphology of Ultrasound Detected Gallbladder Polyps and the Surveillance Implications of Adopting the Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound Consensus Conference Recommendations: A Waikato Experience

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Matthew Jeans, Mohammed Dragh, Martin Necas, Jian Ng
{"title":"Size and Morphology of Ultrasound Detected Gallbladder Polyps and the Surveillance Implications of Adopting the Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound Consensus Conference Recommendations: A Waikato Experience","authors":"Matthew Jeans,&nbsp;Mohammed Dragh,&nbsp;Martin Necas,&nbsp;Jian Ng","doi":"10.1111/1754-9485.13854","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>Gallbladder polyps, the majority of which are benign, represent a common incidental finding during hepatobiliary ultrasound and generate a significant volume of follow-up imaging. The Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound (SRU) has recently released Consensus Conference Recommendations for the management of incidentally detected gallbladder polyps to address the volume of follow-up imaging without losing sensitivity for detecting neoplastic polyps with malignant potential. The primary aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of morphological polyp types in our population. The secondary aim was to determine the potential implications of adopting this new guideline.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A retrospective review was conducted of all patients with gallbladder polyps detected on ultrasound scans performed at Waikato Hospital in the year 2018. Individual gallbladder polyps were analysed by size and morphology according to the categories outlined in the SRU Consensus Recommendations. Outcome data included the findings of subsequent ultrasound imaging in the 3 years following the index scan. Histology results in patients who underwent a cholecystectomy were reviewed.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The study cohort comprised 251 patients with 407 polyps; 51.6% of polyps were deemed ‘extremely low risk’; 48.2% were deemed ‘low-risk’ and one polyp (0.2%) was deemed ‘intermediate risk’. Nearly all polyps identified were &lt; 10 mm in size (96.3%). The majority of gallbladder polyps required no follow-up (88.4%). Of those who underwent follow-up imaging, 89.6% of polyps were unchanged, had decreased in size or were no longer visualised. Of the 28 patients who underwent a subsequent cholecystectomy, 20 had no polyps found, six had nonneoplastic polyps and two were found to have neoplastic polyps including one with invasive gallbladder carcinoma.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Adopting the SRU Consensus Recommendations could prevent potentially unnecessary follow-up ultrasounds and improve resource utilisation without loss of sensitivity in detecting gallbladder carcinoma. Consideration, however, should be given to altering these guidelines on a local level to accommodate the increased incidence of gallbladder carcinoma in Māori patients.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":16218,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology","volume":"69 3","pages":"335-341"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1754-9485.13854","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Gallbladder polyps, the majority of which are benign, represent a common incidental finding during hepatobiliary ultrasound and generate a significant volume of follow-up imaging. The Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound (SRU) has recently released Consensus Conference Recommendations for the management of incidentally detected gallbladder polyps to address the volume of follow-up imaging without losing sensitivity for detecting neoplastic polyps with malignant potential. The primary aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of morphological polyp types in our population. The secondary aim was to determine the potential implications of adopting this new guideline.

Methods

A retrospective review was conducted of all patients with gallbladder polyps detected on ultrasound scans performed at Waikato Hospital in the year 2018. Individual gallbladder polyps were analysed by size and morphology according to the categories outlined in the SRU Consensus Recommendations. Outcome data included the findings of subsequent ultrasound imaging in the 3 years following the index scan. Histology results in patients who underwent a cholecystectomy were reviewed.

Results

The study cohort comprised 251 patients with 407 polyps; 51.6% of polyps were deemed ‘extremely low risk’; 48.2% were deemed ‘low-risk’ and one polyp (0.2%) was deemed ‘intermediate risk’. Nearly all polyps identified were < 10 mm in size (96.3%). The majority of gallbladder polyps required no follow-up (88.4%). Of those who underwent follow-up imaging, 89.6% of polyps were unchanged, had decreased in size or were no longer visualised. Of the 28 patients who underwent a subsequent cholecystectomy, 20 had no polyps found, six had nonneoplastic polyps and two were found to have neoplastic polyps including one with invasive gallbladder carcinoma.

Conclusion

Adopting the SRU Consensus Recommendations could prevent potentially unnecessary follow-up ultrasounds and improve resource utilisation without loss of sensitivity in detecting gallbladder carcinoma. Consideration, however, should be given to altering these guidelines on a local level to accommodate the increased incidence of gallbladder carcinoma in Māori patients.

超声检测胆囊息肉的大小和形态以及采用放射科医师协会超声共识会议建议的监测意义:怀卡托经验。
简介:胆囊息肉,大多数是良性的,是肝胆超声检查中常见的偶然发现,并产生大量的随访成像。超声放射科医师协会(SRU)最近发布了关于偶然发现的胆囊息肉处理的共识会议建议,以解决随访成像的数量问题,同时又不失去检测具有恶性潜力的肿瘤息肉的敏感性。本研究的主要目的是确定形态息肉类型在我国人群中的患病率。第二个目的是确定采用这一新指南的潜在影响。方法:回顾性分析2018年在怀卡托医院超声扫描中发现的所有胆囊息肉患者。根据SRU共识建议中概述的类别,对单个胆囊息肉的大小和形态进行分析。结果数据包括指数扫描后3年内的后续超声成像结果。我们回顾了胆囊切除术患者的组织学结果。结果:研究队列包括251例407例息肉;51.6%的息肉被认为是“极低风险”;48.2%为“低风险”,1例息肉(0.2%)为“中等风险”。结论:采用SRU共识建议可以避免潜在的不必要的超声随访,提高资源利用率,同时又不会失去检测胆囊癌的敏感性。然而,应该考虑在局部水平上改变这些指南,以适应Māori患者胆囊癌发病率的增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
6.20%
发文量
133
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology (formerly Australasian Radiology) is the official journal of The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Radiologists, publishing articles of scientific excellence in radiology and radiation oncology. Manuscripts are judged on the basis of their contribution of original data and ideas or interpretation. All articles are peer reviewed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信