Quantification of Salmonella in Raw Poultry Using Droplet Digital PCR With a Whole Cell, Enrichment-free Approach

IF 2.1 4区 农林科学 Q3 BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY
Cheryl M. Armstrong , Chin-Yi Chen , Yicheng Xie , Javier Atencia , Sophie Pierre , Yiping He , Joe Lee , Gretchen E. Dykes , Kathleen Johnson , Brice Froment , Sean Martinos , Joseph Capobianco
{"title":"Quantification of Salmonella in Raw Poultry Using Droplet Digital PCR With a Whole Cell, Enrichment-free Approach","authors":"Cheryl M. Armstrong ,&nbsp;Chin-Yi Chen ,&nbsp;Yicheng Xie ,&nbsp;Javier Atencia ,&nbsp;Sophie Pierre ,&nbsp;Yiping He ,&nbsp;Joe Lee ,&nbsp;Gretchen E. Dykes ,&nbsp;Kathleen Johnson ,&nbsp;Brice Froment ,&nbsp;Sean Martinos ,&nbsp;Joseph Capobianco","doi":"10.1016/j.jfp.2025.100498","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div><em>Salmonella</em> contamination in poultry remains a persistent public health challenge, despite ongoing regulatory efforts to reduce its presence. Traditional culture-based enrichment methods commonly employed for detecting <em>Salmonella</em> have inherent limitations, such as biases in bacterial growth and inaccurate quantification of initial contamination levels. This study introduces an enrichment-free approach for quantifying <em>Salmonella</em> in raw poultry, utilizing the Pathotrak system for bacterial separation and concentration, followed by Droplet Digital PCR (ddPCR) for absolute quantification. Our findings highlight that whole-cell preparations within ddPCR droplets yield significantly higher detection efficiency compared to extracted DNA, likely due to the reduced loss of genetic material during processing. The method was validated by correlating theoretical inoculation levels with ddPCR measurements, resulting in a strong linear relationship (<em>R</em><sup>2</sup> = 0.903) and a slope of 0.99, indicating high accuracy. Residuals from the regression model were normally distributed, confirming its validity. This platform offers a robust, rapid, and precise tool for detecting low levels of <em>Salmonella</em> in poultry products without enrichment, making it a more accurate and efficient approach to bacterial quantification in complex food matrices.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15903,"journal":{"name":"Journal of food protection","volume":"88 5","pages":"Article 100498"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of food protection","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0362028X2500050X","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Salmonella contamination in poultry remains a persistent public health challenge, despite ongoing regulatory efforts to reduce its presence. Traditional culture-based enrichment methods commonly employed for detecting Salmonella have inherent limitations, such as biases in bacterial growth and inaccurate quantification of initial contamination levels. This study introduces an enrichment-free approach for quantifying Salmonella in raw poultry, utilizing the Pathotrak system for bacterial separation and concentration, followed by Droplet Digital PCR (ddPCR) for absolute quantification. Our findings highlight that whole-cell preparations within ddPCR droplets yield significantly higher detection efficiency compared to extracted DNA, likely due to the reduced loss of genetic material during processing. The method was validated by correlating theoretical inoculation levels with ddPCR measurements, resulting in a strong linear relationship (R2 = 0.903) and a slope of 0.99, indicating high accuracy. Residuals from the regression model were normally distributed, confirming its validity. This platform offers a robust, rapid, and precise tool for detecting low levels of Salmonella in poultry products without enrichment, making it a more accurate and efficient approach to bacterial quantification in complex food matrices.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of food protection
Journal of food protection 工程技术-生物工程与应用微生物
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
5.00%
发文量
296
审稿时长
2.5 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Food Protection® (JFP) is an international, monthly scientific journal in the English language published by the International Association for Food Protection (IAFP). JFP publishes research and review articles on all aspects of food protection and safety. Major emphases of JFP are placed on studies dealing with: Tracking, detecting (including traditional, molecular, and real-time), inactivating, and controlling food-related hazards, including microorganisms (including antibiotic resistance), microbial (mycotoxins, seafood toxins) and non-microbial toxins (heavy metals, pesticides, veterinary drug residues, migrants from food packaging, and processing contaminants), allergens and pests (insects, rodents) in human food, pet food and animal feed throughout the food chain; Microbiological food quality and traditional/novel methods to assay microbiological food quality; Prevention of food-related hazards and food spoilage through food preservatives and thermal/non-thermal processes, including process validation; Food fermentations and food-related probiotics; Safe food handling practices during pre-harvest, harvest, post-harvest, distribution and consumption, including food safety education for retailers, foodservice, and consumers; Risk assessments for food-related hazards; Economic impact of food-related hazards, foodborne illness, food loss, food spoilage, and adulterated foods; Food fraud, food authentication, food defense, and foodborne disease outbreak investigations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信