Feasibility of an Objective Approach Using Acoustic Change Complex for Evaluating Spectral Resolution in Individuals with Normal Hearing and Hearing Loss.

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q3 NEUROSCIENCES
Soojin Kang, Jihwan Woo, Kyung Myun Lee, Hye Yoon Seol, Sung Hwa Hong, Il Joon Moon
{"title":"Feasibility of an Objective Approach Using Acoustic Change Complex for Evaluating Spectral Resolution in Individuals with Normal Hearing and Hearing Loss.","authors":"Soojin Kang, Jihwan Woo, Kyung Myun Lee, Hye Yoon Seol, Sung Hwa Hong, Il Joon Moon","doi":"10.31083/JIN25911","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Identifying the temporal and spectral information in sound is important for understanding speech; indeed, a person who has good spectral resolution usually shows good speech recognition performance. The spectral ripple discrimination (SRD) test is often used to behaviorally determine spectral resolution capacity. However, although the SRD test is useful, it is difficult to apply to populations who cannot execute the behavioral task, such as younger children and people with disabilities. In this study, an objective approach using spectral ripple (SR) stimuli to evoke the acoustic change complex (ACC) response was investigated to determine whether it could objectively evaluate the spectral resolution ability of subjects with normal hearing (NH) and those with hearing loss (HL).</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Ten subjects with NH and eight with HL were enrolled in this study. All subjects completed the behavioral SRD test and the objective SR-ACC test. Additionally, the HL subjects completed speech perception performance tests while wearing hearing aids.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the SRD test, the average thresholds were 6.48 and 1.52 ripples per octave (RPO) for the NH and HL groups, respectively, while in the SR-ACC test, they were 4.90 and 1.35 RPO, respectively. There was a significant difference in the average thresholds between the two groups for the SRD (<i>p</i> < 0.001) and the SR-ACC (<i>p</i> < 0.001) tests. A significant positive correlation was observed between the SRD and SR-ACC tests (ρ = 0.829, <i>p</i> < 0.001). In the HL group, there was a statistically significant relationship between speech recognition performance in noisy conditions and the SR-ACC threshold (ρ = 0.911, <i>p</i> < 0.001 in Sentence score of Korean Speech Audiometry (KSA)).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results supported the feasibility of the SR-ACC test to objectively evaluate auditory spectral resolution in individuals with HL. This test has potential for use in individuals with HL who are unable to complete the behavioral task associated with the SRD test; therefore, it is proposed as a more inclusive alternative to the SRD test.</p>","PeriodicalId":16160,"journal":{"name":"Journal of integrative neuroscience","volume":"24 3","pages":"25911"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of integrative neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31083/JIN25911","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Identifying the temporal and spectral information in sound is important for understanding speech; indeed, a person who has good spectral resolution usually shows good speech recognition performance. The spectral ripple discrimination (SRD) test is often used to behaviorally determine spectral resolution capacity. However, although the SRD test is useful, it is difficult to apply to populations who cannot execute the behavioral task, such as younger children and people with disabilities. In this study, an objective approach using spectral ripple (SR) stimuli to evoke the acoustic change complex (ACC) response was investigated to determine whether it could objectively evaluate the spectral resolution ability of subjects with normal hearing (NH) and those with hearing loss (HL).

Method: Ten subjects with NH and eight with HL were enrolled in this study. All subjects completed the behavioral SRD test and the objective SR-ACC test. Additionally, the HL subjects completed speech perception performance tests while wearing hearing aids.

Results: In the SRD test, the average thresholds were 6.48 and 1.52 ripples per octave (RPO) for the NH and HL groups, respectively, while in the SR-ACC test, they were 4.90 and 1.35 RPO, respectively. There was a significant difference in the average thresholds between the two groups for the SRD (p < 0.001) and the SR-ACC (p < 0.001) tests. A significant positive correlation was observed between the SRD and SR-ACC tests (ρ = 0.829, p < 0.001). In the HL group, there was a statistically significant relationship between speech recognition performance in noisy conditions and the SR-ACC threshold (ρ = 0.911, p < 0.001 in Sentence score of Korean Speech Audiometry (KSA)).

Conclusions: The results supported the feasibility of the SR-ACC test to objectively evaluate auditory spectral resolution in individuals with HL. This test has potential for use in individuals with HL who are unable to complete the behavioral task associated with the SRD test; therefore, it is proposed as a more inclusive alternative to the SRD test.

使用声学变化复合体客观方法评估听力正常和听力损失个体的频谱分辨率的可行性。
背景:识别声音中的时间和频谱信息对于理解语音非常重要;事实上,具有良好频谱分辨率的人通常具有良好的语音识别性能。谱纹判别(SRD)测试通常用于确定光谱分辨能力的行为。然而,尽管SRD测试是有用的,但它很难适用于不能执行行为任务的人群,例如年幼的儿童和残疾人。本研究利用谱纹(spectral ripple, SR)刺激引起的声学变化复合物(acoustic change complex, ACC)反应的客观方法,探讨其能否客观评价听力正常(NH)和听力损失(HL)受试者的频谱分辨能力。方法:选取10例NH患者和8例HL患者。所有被试均完成行为SRD测试和客观SR-ACC测试。此外,HL受试者在佩戴助听器的情况下完成了语音感知性能测试。结果:在SRD测试中,NH组和HL组的平均阈值分别为6.48和1.52个波纹/八度(RPO), SR-ACC测试中分别为4.90和1.35个波纹/八度(RPO)。两组间SRD (p < 0.001)和SR-ACC (p < 0.001)检测的平均阈值有显著差异。SRD与SR-ACC检验呈显著正相关(ρ = 0.829, p < 0.001)。HL组在噪声条件下的语音识别性能与SR-ACC阈值之间存在统计学意义(ρ = 0.911,韩语语音听力(KSA)句子评分p < 0.001)。结论:结果支持SR-ACC测试客观评价HL患者听谱分辨率的可行性。该测试有可能用于无法完成与SRD测试相关的行为任务的HL患者;因此,建议将其作为比SRD测试更具包容性的替代方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
5.60%
发文量
173
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: JIN is an international peer-reviewed, open access journal. JIN publishes leading-edge research at the interface of theoretical and experimental neuroscience, focusing across hierarchical levels of brain organization to better understand how diverse functions are integrated. We encourage submissions from scientists of all specialties that relate to brain functioning.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信