Connecting the soil health-water quality nexus under surface-irrigated conservation tillage.

IF 2.2 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Tad Trimarco, R Daren Harmel, Erik Wardle, Cassidy Buchanan, Ansley Brown, Emmanuel Deleon, Troy Bauder, James A Ippolito
{"title":"Connecting the soil health-water quality nexus under surface-irrigated conservation tillage.","authors":"Tad Trimarco, R Daren Harmel, Erik Wardle, Cassidy Buchanan, Ansley Brown, Emmanuel Deleon, Troy Bauder, James A Ippolito","doi":"10.1002/jeq2.70013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Intense tillage degrades soil health, worsens soil structure, and accelerates nutrient and sediment transport to vulnerable water bodies. Unfortunately, few studies have measured both soil health and water quality under conservation tillage, particularly in semi-arid furrow-irrigated fields, limiting our understanding of tillage impacts in these systems. To address this research gap, we investigated the impact of three tillage types (conventional tillage [CT], strip tillage [ST], and minimum tillage [MT]) on soil health and water quality on large research plots. Specifically, we measured 10 soil health indicators under the Soil Management Assessment Framework, soil organic C fractionations, and six edge-of-field runoff water quality indicators over 2 years. Edge-of-field water quality was improved in ST and MT plots as compared to CT, with reductions in mean concentrations for particulate constituents (sediment and total Kjeldahl N) approaching approximately 50% or greater. Additionally, indicators of physical soil health (bulk density and water-stable aggregates) and biological soil health (microbial biomass C, soil organic C, potentially mineralizable N, and particulate organic matter C) correlated to decreased concentrations of water quality pollutants. This trend was most pronounced for particulate constituents (e.g., sediment, total Kjeldahl N), which were correlated to indicators of aggregate stability. Furthermore, the lack of difference between ST and MT plots with regards to water quality, soil health, and crop yield indicated that there was little difference between ST and MT. In semi-arid furrow-irrigated fields, we suggest utilizing reduced tillage practices to limit offsite sediment loss, nutrient transport, and environmental degradation.</p>","PeriodicalId":15732,"journal":{"name":"Journal of environmental quality","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of environmental quality","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jeq2.70013","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Intense tillage degrades soil health, worsens soil structure, and accelerates nutrient and sediment transport to vulnerable water bodies. Unfortunately, few studies have measured both soil health and water quality under conservation tillage, particularly in semi-arid furrow-irrigated fields, limiting our understanding of tillage impacts in these systems. To address this research gap, we investigated the impact of three tillage types (conventional tillage [CT], strip tillage [ST], and minimum tillage [MT]) on soil health and water quality on large research plots. Specifically, we measured 10 soil health indicators under the Soil Management Assessment Framework, soil organic C fractionations, and six edge-of-field runoff water quality indicators over 2 years. Edge-of-field water quality was improved in ST and MT plots as compared to CT, with reductions in mean concentrations for particulate constituents (sediment and total Kjeldahl N) approaching approximately 50% or greater. Additionally, indicators of physical soil health (bulk density and water-stable aggregates) and biological soil health (microbial biomass C, soil organic C, potentially mineralizable N, and particulate organic matter C) correlated to decreased concentrations of water quality pollutants. This trend was most pronounced for particulate constituents (e.g., sediment, total Kjeldahl N), which were correlated to indicators of aggregate stability. Furthermore, the lack of difference between ST and MT plots with regards to water quality, soil health, and crop yield indicated that there was little difference between ST and MT. In semi-arid furrow-irrigated fields, we suggest utilizing reduced tillage practices to limit offsite sediment loss, nutrient transport, and environmental degradation.

连接地表灌溉保持耕作下的土壤健康-水质关系。
高强度耕作使土壤健康恶化,土壤结构恶化,加速养分和沉积物向脆弱水体的输送。不幸的是,很少有研究测量保护性耕作下的土壤健康和水质,特别是在半干旱的沟灌农田,限制了我们对这些系统中耕作影响的理解。为了解决这一研究空白,我们研究了三种耕作类型(常规耕作[CT]、带状耕作[ST]和最少耕作[MT])对大型研究地块土壤健康和水质的影响。具体而言,我们在2年内测量了土壤管理评价框架下的10个土壤健康指标、土壤有机碳分馏和6个田边径流水质指标。与CT相比,ST和MT地块的边缘水质得到了改善,颗粒成分(沉积物和总凯氏定氮)的平均浓度降低了近50%或更多。此外,土壤物理健康指标(容重和水稳团聚体)和土壤生物健康指标(微生物生物量C、土壤有机C、潜在矿化氮和颗粒有机质C)与水质污染物浓度的降低相关。这种趋势在颗粒成分(如沉积物、总凯氏定氮)中最为明显,它们与团聚体稳定性指标相关。此外,在水质量、土壤健康和作物产量方面,ST和MT之间没有差异,这表明ST和MT之间几乎没有差异。在半干旱沟灌田,我们建议采用减少耕作的做法来限制场地外的沉积物损失、养分运输和环境退化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of environmental quality
Journal of environmental quality 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
8.30%
发文量
123
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Articles in JEQ cover various aspects of anthropogenic impacts on the environment, including agricultural, terrestrial, atmospheric, and aquatic systems, with emphasis on the understanding of underlying processes. To be acceptable for consideration in JEQ, a manuscript must make a significant contribution to the advancement of knowledge or toward a better understanding of existing concepts. The study should define principles of broad applicability, be related to problems over a sizable geographic area, or be of potential interest to a representative number of scientists. Emphasis is given to the understanding of underlying processes rather than to monitoring. Contributions are accepted from all disciplines for consideration by the editorial board. Manuscripts may be volunteered, invited, or coordinated as a special section or symposium.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信