Imaging near titanium total hip arthroplasty at 0.55 T compared with 3 T.

IF 3 3区医学 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING

Magnetic Resonance in Medicine Pub Date : 2025-03-28 DOI:10.1002/mrm.30438

Kübra Keskin, Sophia X Cui, Bochao Li, Jordan S Gross, Jay Acharya, Zorica Buser, Jay R Lieberman, Brian A Hargreaves, Krishna S Nayak

{"title":"Imaging near titanium total hip arthroplasty at 0.55 T compared with 3 T.","authors":"Kübra Keskin, Sophia X Cui, Bochao Li, Jordan S Gross, Jay Acharya, Zorica Buser, Jay R Lieberman, Brian A Hargreaves, Krishna S Nayak","doi":"10.1002/mrm.30438","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: To compare 0.55 T and 3 T MRI for imaging patients with titanium total hip arthroplasty (THA). Patients with orthopedic metallic implants often require diagnostic imaging to evaluate adjacent tissues. MRI performance measures, including artifact levels and SNR, vary with field strength.Methods: Six patients with titanium THA were scanned with similar protocols at 0.55 T and 3 T, including proton density (PD) weighted turbo spin echo (TSE), PD TSE with view-angle tilting (TSE + VAT), PD slice encoding for metal artifact correction (SEMAC), and short tau inversion recovery with SEMAC (STIR-SEMAC). Images from both field strengths were scored by two readers and qualitatively and quantitatively compared.Results: Diagnostic confidence was significantly higher at 0.55 T compared to 3 T. Perceived metal artifact was substantially reduced at 0.55 T compared to 3 T. At 0.55 T, diagnostic imaging was achieved both without and with multi spectral imaging (MSI) for PD weighted images.Conclusion: Compared to 3 T, 0.55 T MRI offers substantially reduced metal artifacts and higher diagnostic confidence when imaging titanium THA. Advanced multi-spectral techniques may not be required when the metallic components are entirely titanium.","PeriodicalId":18065,"journal":{"name":"Magnetic Resonance in Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Magnetic Resonance in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.30438","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To compare 0.55 T and 3 T MRI for imaging patients with titanium total hip arthroplasty (THA). Patients with orthopedic metallic implants often require diagnostic imaging to evaluate adjacent tissues. MRI performance measures, including artifact levels and SNR, vary with field strength.

Methods: Six patients with titanium THA were scanned with similar protocols at 0.55 T and 3 T, including proton density (PD) weighted turbo spin echo (TSE), PD TSE with view-angle tilting (TSE + VAT), PD slice encoding for metal artifact correction (SEMAC), and short tau inversion recovery with SEMAC (STIR-SEMAC). Images from both field strengths were scored by two readers and qualitatively and quantitatively compared.

Results: Diagnostic confidence was significantly higher at 0.55 T compared to 3 T. Perceived metal artifact was substantially reduced at 0.55 T compared to 3 T. At 0.55 T, diagnostic imaging was achieved both without and with multi spectral imaging (MSI) for PD weighted images.

Conclusion: Compared to 3 T, 0.55 T MRI offers substantially reduced metal artifacts and higher diagnostic confidence when imaging titanium THA. Advanced multi-spectral techniques may not be required when the metallic components are entirely titanium.

查看原文本刊更多论文

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 医学-核医学

CiteScore

6.70

自引率

24.20%

发文量

376

审稿时长

2-4 weeks

期刊介绍： Magnetic Resonance in Medicine (Magn Reson Med) is an international journal devoted to the publication of original investigations concerned with all aspects of the development and use of nuclear magnetic resonance and electron paramagnetic resonance techniques for medical applications. Reports of original investigations in the areas of mathematics, computing, engineering, physics, biophysics, chemistry, biochemistry, and physiology directly relevant to magnetic resonance will be accepted, as well as methodology-oriented clinical studies.