Predictive evidence for the impact of personality styles on depression and functioning in two bipolar disorder cohorts

IF 4.9 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Kelly A. Ryan , Anastasia K. Yocum , Yuhua Zhang , Peisong Han , David F. Marshall , Paul T. Costa , Sarah H. Sperry , Takakuni Suzuki , Melvin G. McInnis , Sebastian Zöllner
{"title":"Predictive evidence for the impact of personality styles on depression and functioning in two bipolar disorder cohorts","authors":"Kelly A. Ryan ,&nbsp;Anastasia K. Yocum ,&nbsp;Yuhua Zhang ,&nbsp;Peisong Han ,&nbsp;David F. Marshall ,&nbsp;Paul T. Costa ,&nbsp;Sarah H. Sperry ,&nbsp;Takakuni Suzuki ,&nbsp;Melvin G. McInnis ,&nbsp;Sebastian Zöllner","doi":"10.1016/j.jad.2025.03.131","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Predictors for course of illness in bipolar disorder (BD) with replicable effect are difficult to identify. Potential predictors of outcomes for BD that could inform practice include personality traits, particularly Neuroticism. However, models typically fail to consider the joint effect of multiple personality traits. We examine whether personality trait combinations (styles) enhance our ability to prospectively predict symptoms and functioning across time in two independent longitudinal research cohorts. In a discovery sample of 489 and replication sample of 2072 individuals with BD, we assessed impact of personality styles using the NEO PI-R and NEO-FFI on depression and functioning up to 14 years. Using a model considering all ten possible personality style combinations, the number of risk-related personality styles (styles associated with poor outcomes) relative to number of protective-related personality styles (styles associated with better outcomes) showed that for every additional risk relative to protective style count, the incident rate of depression increased by 11.8–15.0 % and the incident rate for poor life functioning increased by 11.1 %. This similar pattern of increased risk styles being associated with significant increases in depression and functioning was replicated in the independent STEP-BD dataset, although with slightly lower incident rate (5 % and 2.9 %). Cross validation of performance from both cohorts showed similar predictive patterns (5–11.2 % increases). The ability to predict future depression and poor functioning from the combined effects of personality traits can be clinically useful for identifying individuals at risk for poorer outcomes. Personality styles should be evaluated when planning long-term care and developing interventions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":14963,"journal":{"name":"Journal of affective disorders","volume":"380 ","pages":"Pages 746-755"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of affective disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165032725004793","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Predictors for course of illness in bipolar disorder (BD) with replicable effect are difficult to identify. Potential predictors of outcomes for BD that could inform practice include personality traits, particularly Neuroticism. However, models typically fail to consider the joint effect of multiple personality traits. We examine whether personality trait combinations (styles) enhance our ability to prospectively predict symptoms and functioning across time in two independent longitudinal research cohorts. In a discovery sample of 489 and replication sample of 2072 individuals with BD, we assessed impact of personality styles using the NEO PI-R and NEO-FFI on depression and functioning up to 14 years. Using a model considering all ten possible personality style combinations, the number of risk-related personality styles (styles associated with poor outcomes) relative to number of protective-related personality styles (styles associated with better outcomes) showed that for every additional risk relative to protective style count, the incident rate of depression increased by 11.8–15.0 % and the incident rate for poor life functioning increased by 11.1 %. This similar pattern of increased risk styles being associated with significant increases in depression and functioning was replicated in the independent STEP-BD dataset, although with slightly lower incident rate (5 % and 2.9 %). Cross validation of performance from both cohorts showed similar predictive patterns (5–11.2 % increases). The ability to predict future depression and poor functioning from the combined effects of personality traits can be clinically useful for identifying individuals at risk for poorer outcomes. Personality styles should be evaluated when planning long-term care and developing interventions.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of affective disorders
Journal of affective disorders 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
6.10%
发文量
1319
审稿时长
9.3 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Affective Disorders publishes papers concerned with affective disorders in the widest sense: depression, mania, mood spectrum, emotions and personality, anxiety and stress. It is interdisciplinary and aims to bring together different approaches for a diverse readership. Top quality papers will be accepted dealing with any aspect of affective disorders, including neuroimaging, cognitive neurosciences, genetics, molecular biology, experimental and clinical neurosciences, pharmacology, neuroimmunoendocrinology, intervention and treatment trials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信