Talk the Talk: The Role of Primary Language in Velopharyngeal Insufficiency.

IF 1 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Marina Shenouda, Kylie Swiekatowski, Stephanie M Johnson, Matthew R Greives, Phuong D Nguyen
{"title":"Talk the Talk: The Role of Primary Language in Velopharyngeal Insufficiency.","authors":"Marina Shenouda, Kylie Swiekatowski, Stephanie M Johnson, Matthew R Greives, Phuong D Nguyen","doi":"10.1097/SCS.0000000000011245","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Velopharyngeal insufficiency (VPI) may occur after primary cleft palate repair. The contributory role of language to VPI is unknown. This study seeks to determine the incidence of VPI in Spanish-speaking versus English-speaking patients after cleft palate repair and evaluate patient-reported speech outcomes. Patients from the Texas Cleft-Craniofacial Team at UTHealth who had primary cleft palate repair from 2004 to 2019 were identified and divided into primary language groups: English (EN) or Spanish (SP). A retrospective analysis of VPI incidence and a prospective patient-reported survey of speech outcomes were conducted. Of the 228 patients included in the study, 46 (20%) were SP and 182 (80%) were EN. There was no statistical difference in the Veau class or type of primary palate repair performed in SP and EN patients. There was a greater incidence of VPI in SP patients compared with EN patients (52% versus 38%, P=0.04). Average median income was significantly lower in the SP group ($55,638±$23,195) compared with the EN group ($81,278±$33,869, P<0.001). Forty patients and their parents were surveyed. SP patients CLEFT-Q trended lower than EN patients in Speech Function (58±18.19 versus 68±20.61, P=0.17) and Speech Distress (64±17.30 versus 70±18.16, P=0.43). There was a statistically significant greater incidence of VPI in Spanish-speaking patients compared with English-speaking patients. Median income was lower in the Spanish group. Further research is needed to investigate contributing factors such as sociodemographics with the goal of achieving equitable outcomes in these groups.</p>","PeriodicalId":15462,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Craniofacial Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Craniofacial Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000011245","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Velopharyngeal insufficiency (VPI) may occur after primary cleft palate repair. The contributory role of language to VPI is unknown. This study seeks to determine the incidence of VPI in Spanish-speaking versus English-speaking patients after cleft palate repair and evaluate patient-reported speech outcomes. Patients from the Texas Cleft-Craniofacial Team at UTHealth who had primary cleft palate repair from 2004 to 2019 were identified and divided into primary language groups: English (EN) or Spanish (SP). A retrospective analysis of VPI incidence and a prospective patient-reported survey of speech outcomes were conducted. Of the 228 patients included in the study, 46 (20%) were SP and 182 (80%) were EN. There was no statistical difference in the Veau class or type of primary palate repair performed in SP and EN patients. There was a greater incidence of VPI in SP patients compared with EN patients (52% versus 38%, P=0.04). Average median income was significantly lower in the SP group ($55,638±$23,195) compared with the EN group ($81,278±$33,869, P<0.001). Forty patients and their parents were surveyed. SP patients CLEFT-Q trended lower than EN patients in Speech Function (58±18.19 versus 68±20.61, P=0.17) and Speech Distress (64±17.30 versus 70±18.16, P=0.43). There was a statistically significant greater incidence of VPI in Spanish-speaking patients compared with English-speaking patients. Median income was lower in the Spanish group. Further research is needed to investigate contributing factors such as sociodemographics with the goal of achieving equitable outcomes in these groups.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
11.10%
发文量
968
审稿时长
1.5 months
期刊介绍: ​The Journal of Craniofacial Surgery serves as a forum of communication for all those involved in craniofacial surgery, maxillofacial surgery and pediatric plastic surgery. Coverage ranges from practical aspects of craniofacial surgery to the basic science that underlies surgical practice. The journal publishes original articles, scientific reviews, editorials and invited commentary, abstracts and selected articles from international journals, and occasional international bibliographies in craniofacial surgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信