Determining operating lung volumes during a CO2 rebreathing test: Does the inspiratory capacity maneuver influence the hypercapnic ventilatory response?

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q1 PHYSIOLOGY
Parsa Shekarloo, Christine A Darko, Ghazal Adibmoradi, Parsa Jamal-Zadeh, Tania J Pereira, Heather Edgell, Devin B Phillips
{"title":"Determining operating lung volumes during a CO<sub>2</sub> rebreathing test: Does the inspiratory capacity maneuver influence the hypercapnic ventilatory response?","authors":"Parsa Shekarloo, Christine A Darko, Ghazal Adibmoradi, Parsa Jamal-Zadeh, Tania J Pereira, Heather Edgell, Devin B Phillips","doi":"10.1152/japplphysiol.00938.2024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Previous studies using the modified Duffin CO<sub>2</sub> rebreathing test have not accounted for changes in operating lung volumes, which may affect the hypercapnic ventilatory response (HCVR). Importantly, determining operating lung volumes requires the performance of an inspiratory capacity maneuver (IC), which could influence the HCVR. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to determine if serial IC measurements during a modified Duffin CO<sub>2</sub> rebreathing test influenced HCVR. Thirty young healthy participants (15 male:15 female) completed two modified Duffin CO<sub>2</sub> rebreathing tests on separate days (order randomized). Serial IC maneuvers were completed at 2-minute intervals throughout rebreathing (IC condition only) and expired-gas data were acquired to determine ventilation (⩒<sub>E</sub>) and the partial pressure of end-tidal CO<sub>2</sub> (P<sub>ET</sub>CO<sub>2</sub>). Basal ⩒<sub>E</sub>, the ⩒<sub>E</sub> recruitment for threshold for CO<sub>2</sub> (VRTCO<sub>2</sub>), and the ⩒<sub>E</sub>:CO<sub>2</sub> slope (⩒<sub>ES</sub>) were determined and expired-gas and sensory data were compared between-conditions at standardized time points. There were no between-condition (IC vs no-IC trial) differences in basal ⩒<sub>E</sub>, VRTCO<sub>2</sub>, and ⩒<sub>ES</sub> (all p>0.05). Repeated measure analysis revealed no betweencondition differences in ⩒<sub>E</sub> or P<sub>ET</sub>CO<sub>2</sub> as a function of rebreathing time (all p>0.05). Intraclass correlation coefficient values for basal ⩒<sub>E</sub>, VRTCO<sub>2</sub>, and ⩒<sub>ES</sub> were 0.745, 0.692, and 0.828, indicating good between test agreement. The HCVR during a standardized CO<sub>2</sub> rebreathing protocol was unaffected when including serial measurements of IC. The findings from the current study support inclusion of IC measurements to determine operating lung volumes in healthy young adults, which in turn will improve characterization of the HCVR.</p>","PeriodicalId":15160,"journal":{"name":"Journal of applied physiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of applied physiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.00938.2024","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PHYSIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Previous studies using the modified Duffin CO2 rebreathing test have not accounted for changes in operating lung volumes, which may affect the hypercapnic ventilatory response (HCVR). Importantly, determining operating lung volumes requires the performance of an inspiratory capacity maneuver (IC), which could influence the HCVR. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to determine if serial IC measurements during a modified Duffin CO2 rebreathing test influenced HCVR. Thirty young healthy participants (15 male:15 female) completed two modified Duffin CO2 rebreathing tests on separate days (order randomized). Serial IC maneuvers were completed at 2-minute intervals throughout rebreathing (IC condition only) and expired-gas data were acquired to determine ventilation (⩒E) and the partial pressure of end-tidal CO2 (PETCO2). Basal ⩒E, the ⩒E recruitment for threshold for CO2 (VRTCO2), and the ⩒E:CO2 slope (⩒ES) were determined and expired-gas and sensory data were compared between-conditions at standardized time points. There were no between-condition (IC vs no-IC trial) differences in basal ⩒E, VRTCO2, and ⩒ES (all p>0.05). Repeated measure analysis revealed no betweencondition differences in ⩒E or PETCO2 as a function of rebreathing time (all p>0.05). Intraclass correlation coefficient values for basal ⩒E, VRTCO2, and ⩒ES were 0.745, 0.692, and 0.828, indicating good between test agreement. The HCVR during a standardized CO2 rebreathing protocol was unaffected when including serial measurements of IC. The findings from the current study support inclusion of IC measurements to determine operating lung volumes in healthy young adults, which in turn will improve characterization of the HCVR.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
9.10%
发文量
296
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Applied Physiology publishes the highest quality original research and reviews that examine novel adaptive and integrative physiological mechanisms in humans and animals that advance the field. The journal encourages the submission of manuscripts that examine the acute and adaptive responses of various organs, tissues, cells and/or molecular pathways to environmental, physiological and/or pathophysiological stressors. As an applied physiology journal, topics of interest are not limited to a particular organ system. The journal, therefore, considers a wide array of integrative and translational research topics examining the mechanisms involved in disease processes and mitigation strategies, as well as the promotion of health and well-being throughout the lifespan. Priority is given to manuscripts that provide mechanistic insight deemed to exert an impact on the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信