Outcome of septal vascular injury and perforation in left bundle branch area pacing: Evaluating septal integrity using an institutional protocol.

IF 5.6 2区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Emine Özpak, Tijs Tournoy, Thomas Van Overmeiren, Frederic Van Heuverswyn, Frank Timmermans, Jan De Pooter
{"title":"Outcome of septal vascular injury and perforation in left bundle branch area pacing: Evaluating septal integrity using an institutional protocol.","authors":"Emine Özpak, Tijs Tournoy, Thomas Van Overmeiren, Frederic Van Heuverswyn, Frank Timmermans, Jan De Pooter","doi":"10.1016/j.hrthm.2025.03.1982","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) involves deep septal lead deployment to capture the left bundle branch or adjacent myocardium, which could compromise the septum's structural integrity or pose injury to the septal vasculature. The potential long-term effects of these complications remain unclear.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate acute and long-term outcomes of septal injury during LBBAP using a structured institutional protocol.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Adult patients receiving LBBAP between March 2019 and October 2024 were assessed for septal complications, including septal perforation, septal venous channel perforation (SVCP), septal coronary artery fistula (SCAF), and septal hematomas. The protocol included intraprocedural septography and postprocedural echocardiography, including visual assessment and strain imaging, to assess global and septal kinetics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 636 patients, 32 (5%) experienced septal complications: 26 septal perforations (4%), 3 SVCPs (0.5%), and 3 SCAFs (0.5%). All perforations and SVCPs were identified during implantation, whereas SCAFs were diagnosed postprocedurally. All complications were asymptomatic with no adverse clinical outcomes. Septal kinetics remained unaffected as peak septal strain values showed no significant differences before and after implantation (from 20.4% ± 3.6% to 21.3% ± 3.3%; P = .16). No late perforations or ventricular septal defects were observed. Two SCAFs healed spontaneously, and 1 persisted asymptomatically. Key pacing characteristics and left ventricular ejection fraction remained stable throughout follow-up.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Septal perforations are the most frequent septal complication and are easily detected. Septal vascular injuries can be detected by dedicated protocols but occur rarely. None of these complications compromised septal integrity or function.</p>","PeriodicalId":12886,"journal":{"name":"Heart rhythm","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Heart rhythm","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrthm.2025.03.1982","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) involves deep septal lead deployment to capture the left bundle branch or adjacent myocardium, which could compromise the septum's structural integrity or pose injury to the septal vasculature. The potential long-term effects of these complications remain unclear.

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate acute and long-term outcomes of septal injury during LBBAP using a structured institutional protocol.

Methods: Adult patients receiving LBBAP between March 2019 and October 2024 were assessed for septal complications, including septal perforation, septal venous channel perforation (SVCP), septal coronary artery fistula (SCAF), and septal hematomas. The protocol included intraprocedural septography and postprocedural echocardiography, including visual assessment and strain imaging, to assess global and septal kinetics.

Results: Of 636 patients, 32 (5%) experienced septal complications: 26 septal perforations (4%), 3 SVCPs (0.5%), and 3 SCAFs (0.5%). All perforations and SVCPs were identified during implantation, whereas SCAFs were diagnosed postprocedurally. All complications were asymptomatic with no adverse clinical outcomes. Septal kinetics remained unaffected as peak septal strain values showed no significant differences before and after implantation (from 20.4% ± 3.6% to 21.3% ± 3.3%; P = .16). No late perforations or ventricular septal defects were observed. Two SCAFs healed spontaneously, and 1 persisted asymptomatically. Key pacing characteristics and left ventricular ejection fraction remained stable throughout follow-up.

Conclusion: Septal perforations are the most frequent septal complication and are easily detected. Septal vascular injuries can be detected by dedicated protocols but occur rarely. None of these complications compromised septal integrity or function.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Heart rhythm
Heart rhythm 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
10.50
自引率
5.50%
发文量
1465
审稿时长
24 days
期刊介绍: HeartRhythm, the official Journal of the Heart Rhythm Society and the Cardiac Electrophysiology Society, is a unique journal for fundamental discovery and clinical applicability. HeartRhythm integrates the entire cardiac electrophysiology (EP) community from basic and clinical academic researchers, private practitioners, engineers, allied professionals, industry, and trainees, all of whom are vital and interdependent members of our EP community. The Heart Rhythm Society is the international leader in science, education, and advocacy for cardiac arrhythmia professionals and patients, and the primary information resource on heart rhythm disorders. Its mission is to improve the care of patients by promoting research, education, and optimal health care policies and standards.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信