Identifying potential chemicals of concern in children's products in a regulatory context: a systematic evidence mapping approach.

IF 10.1 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Gabrielle Rigutto, Elena Galkina, Logan V Hayes, Simona Andreea Bălan
{"title":"Identifying potential chemicals of concern in children's products in a regulatory context: a systematic evidence mapping approach.","authors":"Gabrielle Rigutto, Elena Galkina, Logan V Hayes, Simona Andreea Bălan","doi":"10.1289/EHP15394","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Children's vulnerability to chemical toxicant exposures demands strong consideration of the chemical composition of products designed for and marketed toward them. Inadequacies in health-protective legislation and lack of mandatory ingredient disclosure in most children's products have created significant gaps in protection and oversight. Scientific literature can provide insight into the chemical constituency of children's products that may be useful for prioritizing future regulatory efforts.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We aimed to present a proof of concept for applying systematic evidence mapping methodology to identify which chemicals of potential concern have been reported in the scientific literature to be present in products marketed toward children, to inform future research and regulatory efforts.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a broad, all-encompassing survey of the available literature from four databases to identify chemicals present in children's products. Using systematic evidence mapping methodologies, we constructed a database of children's products and their chemical constituents (termed \"<i>product-chemical combinations</i>\") based on a broad survey of current and relevant environmental health literature. Our study focused on chemicals present on the California Safer Consumer Products Program's Candidate Chemicals List, which includes chemicals with one or more known hazard traits. We then conducted an exploratory data analysis of product category and product-chemical combination frequencies to identify common chemicals in specific products.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our systematic evidence mapping identified 206 potentially hazardous chemicals in children's products, 170 of which were found in toys. In total, we found 1528 distinct product-chemical combinations; 582 product-chemical combinations included chemicals known to be hazardous or potentially hazardous. Ortho-phthalates in plastic toys, parabens in children's creams/lotions, and bisphenols in both baby bottles and teethers were the most frequently encountered product-chemical combinations of potential concern.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The frequently reported presence of endocrine-disrupting chemicals in multiple types of children's products raises concerns for aggregate exposures and reveals gaps in regulatory protections for this sensitive subpopulation. Our reproducible and systematic evidence-based approach serves as a case study that can guide other prioritization efforts for transparent regulatory action aimed at improving the safety of chemicals in consumer products. https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP15394.</p>","PeriodicalId":11862,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Health Perspectives","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":10.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Health Perspectives","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP15394","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Children's vulnerability to chemical toxicant exposures demands strong consideration of the chemical composition of products designed for and marketed toward them. Inadequacies in health-protective legislation and lack of mandatory ingredient disclosure in most children's products have created significant gaps in protection and oversight. Scientific literature can provide insight into the chemical constituency of children's products that may be useful for prioritizing future regulatory efforts.

Objective: We aimed to present a proof of concept for applying systematic evidence mapping methodology to identify which chemicals of potential concern have been reported in the scientific literature to be present in products marketed toward children, to inform future research and regulatory efforts.

Methods: We conducted a broad, all-encompassing survey of the available literature from four databases to identify chemicals present in children's products. Using systematic evidence mapping methodologies, we constructed a database of children's products and their chemical constituents (termed "product-chemical combinations") based on a broad survey of current and relevant environmental health literature. Our study focused on chemicals present on the California Safer Consumer Products Program's Candidate Chemicals List, which includes chemicals with one or more known hazard traits. We then conducted an exploratory data analysis of product category and product-chemical combination frequencies to identify common chemicals in specific products.

Results: Our systematic evidence mapping identified 206 potentially hazardous chemicals in children's products, 170 of which were found in toys. In total, we found 1528 distinct product-chemical combinations; 582 product-chemical combinations included chemicals known to be hazardous or potentially hazardous. Ortho-phthalates in plastic toys, parabens in children's creams/lotions, and bisphenols in both baby bottles and teethers were the most frequently encountered product-chemical combinations of potential concern.

Discussion: The frequently reported presence of endocrine-disrupting chemicals in multiple types of children's products raises concerns for aggregate exposures and reveals gaps in regulatory protections for this sensitive subpopulation. Our reproducible and systematic evidence-based approach serves as a case study that can guide other prioritization efforts for transparent regulatory action aimed at improving the safety of chemicals in consumer products. https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP15394.

背景:儿童很容易接触到化学有毒物质,这就要求对专为儿童设计和面向儿童销售的产品的化学成分进行严格审查。健康保护立法的不足以及大多数儿童产品缺乏强制性成分披露,造成了在保护和监督方面的巨大差距。科学文献可以让人们深入了解儿童产品的化学成分,这可能有助于确定未来监管工作的优先次序:我们旨在提出一个概念验证,即应用系统性证据图谱方法来确定科学文献中报道的儿童产品中存在哪些可能令人担忧的化学物质,从而为未来的研究和监管工作提供信息:我们对四个数据库中的现有文献进行了广泛、全面的调查,以确定儿童产品中存在的化学物质。我们采用系统的证据映射方法,在对当前相关环境健康文献进行广泛调查的基础上,建立了一个儿童产品及其化学成分(称为 "产品-化学组合")数据库。我们的研究重点是加州更安全消费品计划候选化学品清单中的化学品,该清单包括具有一种或多种已知危害特征的化学品。然后,我们对产品类别和产品-化学品组合频率进行了探索性数据分析,以确定特定产品中常见的化学品:我们的系统性证据图谱确定了儿童产品中的 206 种潜在危险化学品,其中 170 种出现在玩具中。我们总共发现了 1528 种不同的产品-化学品组合;其中 582 种产品-化学品组合包含已知有害或潜在有害的化学品。塑料玩具中的邻苯二甲酸酯、儿童面霜/乳液中的对羟基苯甲酸酯以及婴儿奶瓶和牙胶中的双酚是最常见的潜在危险产品-化学品组合:讨论:在多种类型的儿童产品中经常出现干扰内分泌的化学物质,这引起了人们对总暴露量的关注,并揭示了对这一敏感亚人群的监管保护方面存在的差距。我们可重复的系统化循证方法可作为案例研究,指导其他旨在提高消费品中化学品安全性的透明监管行动的优先排序工作。https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP15394。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Environmental Health Perspectives
Environmental Health Perspectives 环境科学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
14.40
自引率
2.90%
发文量
388
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Environmental Health Perspectives (EHP) is a monthly peer-reviewed journal supported by the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, part of the National Institutes of Health under the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Its mission is to facilitate discussions on the connections between the environment and human health by publishing top-notch research and news. EHP ranks third in Public, Environmental, and Occupational Health, fourth in Toxicology, and fifth in Environmental Sciences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信