Associations Between Prophylactic IV Antibiotics and Outcomes in Patients With Acute Severe Brain Injury Who Require Mechanical Ventilation: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

IF 7.7 1区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Selina Ehrenzeller, Michael Klompas
{"title":"Associations Between Prophylactic IV Antibiotics and Outcomes in Patients With Acute Severe Brain Injury Who Require Mechanical Ventilation: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Selina Ehrenzeller, Michael Klompas","doi":"10.1097/CCM.0000000000006654","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate the impact of prophylactic IV antibiotics on ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) and other outcomes in critically ill patients with acute brain injury.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>We searched PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, and other databases without language restrictions from inception to November 1, 2024.</p><p><strong>Study selection: </strong>We included randomized trials that enrolled patients 16 years old or older with severe acute brain injury (e.g., trauma, stroke, and hypoxia) and compared prophylactic IV antibiotics to placebo or no antibiotics. Studies evaluating oral or gastric antibiotic prophylaxis were excluded.</p><p><strong>Data extraction: </strong>Two reviewers independently evaluated study characteristics, pneumonia rates, mortality, duration of mechanical ventilation, ICU and hospital length of stay, post-admission bacteremia, antibiotic utilization, neurologic outcomes, and adverse events including antibiotic-resistance and Clostridioides difficile infections. Quality was assessed using the Cochrane risk-of-bias template. Studies were synthesized using inverse-variance random-effects models. Sensitivity analyses included stratifications by risk-of-bias, Glasgow Coma Scale, antibiotic duration, and mechanism of brain injury.</p><p><strong>Data synthesis: </strong>We identified seven eligible trials (827 patients). Prophylactic antibiotics were associated with less VAP (risk ratio [RR], 0.61; 95% CI, 0.47-0.78; I2 = 23%) but not with changes in duration of mechanical ventilation (mean difference [MD], -0.45; 95% CI, -1.63 to +0.74), ICU length of stay (MD, -1.76 d; 95% CI, -3.94 to +0.42 d), hospital mortality (RR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.74-1.12), or long-term neurologic outcomes. On stratification by mechanism of injury, antibiotic prophylaxis was associated with significantly less VAP, shorter ICU length of stay, and a trend toward lower mortality in patients with structural but not hypoxic brain injuries. Other sensitivity analyses were consistent with the primary findings.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Among critically ill patients with acute brain injury, prophylactic IV antibiotics were associated with less VAP but not with changes in length of stay, mortality, or neurologic outcomes. Patients with structural brain injuries may benefit more than those with hypoxic brain injury but further studies are needed to confirm or refute this possibility.</p>","PeriodicalId":10765,"journal":{"name":"Critical Care Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Care Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0000000000006654","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the impact of prophylactic IV antibiotics on ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) and other outcomes in critically ill patients with acute brain injury.

Data sources: We searched PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, and other databases without language restrictions from inception to November 1, 2024.

Study selection: We included randomized trials that enrolled patients 16 years old or older with severe acute brain injury (e.g., trauma, stroke, and hypoxia) and compared prophylactic IV antibiotics to placebo or no antibiotics. Studies evaluating oral or gastric antibiotic prophylaxis were excluded.

Data extraction: Two reviewers independently evaluated study characteristics, pneumonia rates, mortality, duration of mechanical ventilation, ICU and hospital length of stay, post-admission bacteremia, antibiotic utilization, neurologic outcomes, and adverse events including antibiotic-resistance and Clostridioides difficile infections. Quality was assessed using the Cochrane risk-of-bias template. Studies were synthesized using inverse-variance random-effects models. Sensitivity analyses included stratifications by risk-of-bias, Glasgow Coma Scale, antibiotic duration, and mechanism of brain injury.

Data synthesis: We identified seven eligible trials (827 patients). Prophylactic antibiotics were associated with less VAP (risk ratio [RR], 0.61; 95% CI, 0.47-0.78; I2 = 23%) but not with changes in duration of mechanical ventilation (mean difference [MD], -0.45; 95% CI, -1.63 to +0.74), ICU length of stay (MD, -1.76 d; 95% CI, -3.94 to +0.42 d), hospital mortality (RR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.74-1.12), or long-term neurologic outcomes. On stratification by mechanism of injury, antibiotic prophylaxis was associated with significantly less VAP, shorter ICU length of stay, and a trend toward lower mortality in patients with structural but not hypoxic brain injuries. Other sensitivity analyses were consistent with the primary findings.

Conclusions: Among critically ill patients with acute brain injury, prophylactic IV antibiotics were associated with less VAP but not with changes in length of stay, mortality, or neurologic outcomes. Patients with structural brain injuries may benefit more than those with hypoxic brain injury but further studies are needed to confirm or refute this possibility.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Critical Care Medicine
Critical Care Medicine 医学-危重病医学
CiteScore
16.30
自引率
5.70%
发文量
728
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Critical Care Medicine is the premier peer-reviewed, scientific publication in critical care medicine. Directed to those specialists who treat patients in the ICU and CCU, including chest physicians, surgeons, pediatricians, pharmacists/pharmacologists, anesthesiologists, critical care nurses, and other healthcare professionals, Critical Care Medicine covers all aspects of acute and emergency care for the critically ill or injured patient. Each issue presents critical care practitioners with clinical breakthroughs that lead to better patient care, the latest news on promising research, and advances in equipment and techniques.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信