A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review of Cardiac Troponin I vs T in Community Dwelling Adults: Is Specificity at Risk?

IF 7.1 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY
Yashika Parashar, Aya Awwad, Soahum Bagchi, Brian Claggett, Saman Asad Siddiqui, Ajari Winifred Ogheneochuko, Christie M Ballantyne, Christopher deFilippi
{"title":"A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review of Cardiac Troponin I vs T in Community Dwelling Adults: Is Specificity at Risk?","authors":"Yashika Parashar, Aya Awwad, Soahum Bagchi, Brian Claggett, Saman Asad Siddiqui, Ajari Winifred Ogheneochuko, Christie M Ballantyne, Christopher deFilippi","doi":"10.1093/clinchem/hvaf023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cardiac troponin I and T measured by high-sensitivity assays (hs-cTn) are detectable in most ambulatory adults. Hs-cTnI and T may perform differently for prediction of cardiovascular (CV) events. In adults with myopathies and advanced age, hs-cTnT can lose CV specificity. We undertook a meta-analysis of ambulatory studies measuring hs-cTn to determine whether hs-cTnI is a superior predictor of CV outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Articles evaluating hs-cTnI or T for incident heart failure (HF), myocardial infarction (MI), CV, and all-cause death in ambulatory adults were screened. Adjusted HRs were extracted standardized as hs-cTn tertile 3 vs 1. Pooled effects were calculated, and heterogeneity assessed. Predefined subgroup analyses for hs-cTnI vs T included age and prevalent CV disease.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 5499 studies were screened and 54 met inclusion criteria with up to 277 498 participants followed for 8.1 ± 4.5 years. Pooled estimates for HF, MI, CV, and all-cause death were reported as 2.30 [95% confidence interval (CI) 2.04, 2.60], 1.64 (95%CI 1.47, 1.86), 2.07 (95%CI 1.82, 2.35), and 1.66 (95%CI 1.51, 1.83). No differences in HRs for subgroups based on hs-cTnI vs hs-cTnT (except all-cause death), age, or prevalent CV disease were observed. Heterogeneity between studies was high with an I2 > 60% for all endpoints for both hs-cTn assays. In a sensitivity analysis of studies measuring both hs-cTnI and T there was also no differences for the prediction of any CV endpoint.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Hs-cTnI and T prediction of multiple CV endpoints are not significantly different irrespective of age and pre-existing CV disease in ambulatory adults.</p>","PeriodicalId":10690,"journal":{"name":"Clinical chemistry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/clinchem/hvaf023","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Cardiac troponin I and T measured by high-sensitivity assays (hs-cTn) are detectable in most ambulatory adults. Hs-cTnI and T may perform differently for prediction of cardiovascular (CV) events. In adults with myopathies and advanced age, hs-cTnT can lose CV specificity. We undertook a meta-analysis of ambulatory studies measuring hs-cTn to determine whether hs-cTnI is a superior predictor of CV outcomes.

Methods: Articles evaluating hs-cTnI or T for incident heart failure (HF), myocardial infarction (MI), CV, and all-cause death in ambulatory adults were screened. Adjusted HRs were extracted standardized as hs-cTn tertile 3 vs 1. Pooled effects were calculated, and heterogeneity assessed. Predefined subgroup analyses for hs-cTnI vs T included age and prevalent CV disease.

Results: A total of 5499 studies were screened and 54 met inclusion criteria with up to 277 498 participants followed for 8.1 ± 4.5 years. Pooled estimates for HF, MI, CV, and all-cause death were reported as 2.30 [95% confidence interval (CI) 2.04, 2.60], 1.64 (95%CI 1.47, 1.86), 2.07 (95%CI 1.82, 2.35), and 1.66 (95%CI 1.51, 1.83). No differences in HRs for subgroups based on hs-cTnI vs hs-cTnT (except all-cause death), age, or prevalent CV disease were observed. Heterogeneity between studies was high with an I2 > 60% for all endpoints for both hs-cTn assays. In a sensitivity analysis of studies measuring both hs-cTnI and T there was also no differences for the prediction of any CV endpoint.

Conclusions: Hs-cTnI and T prediction of multiple CV endpoints are not significantly different irrespective of age and pre-existing CV disease in ambulatory adults.

背景:通过高灵敏度测定法(hs-cTn)测量的心肌肌钙蛋白 I 和 T 可在大多数非卧床成年人中检测到。hs-cTnI 和 T 在预测心血管(CV)事件方面的表现可能不同。在患有肌病和高龄的成年人中,hs-cTnT 可能会失去心血管特异性。我们对测量 hs-cTn 的非卧床研究进行了荟萃分析,以确定 hs-cTnI 是否能更好地预测 CV 结果:方法: 筛选了对非卧床成人心力衰竭(HF)、心肌梗死(MI)、CV 和全因死亡事件的 hs-cTnI 或 T 进行评估的文章。提取调整后的 HRs,并将其标准化为 hs-cTn tertile 3 vs 1。计算汇总效应并评估异质性。hs-cTnI与T的预定义亚组分析包括年龄和流行性心血管疾病:共筛选出 5499 项研究,54 项符合纳入标准,对多达 277 498 名参与者进行了长达 8.1 ± 4.5 年的随访。据报道,HF、MI、CV 和全因死亡的汇总估计值分别为 2.30 [95% 置信区间 (CI) 2.04, 2.60]、1.64 (95%CI 1.47, 1.86)、2.07 (95%CI 1.82, 2.35) 和 1.66 (95%CI 1.51, 1.83)。根据 hs-cTnI 与 hs-cTnT(全因死亡除外)、年龄或流行性心血管疾病划分的亚组的 HRs 无差异。研究之间的异质性很高,两种 hs-cTn 检测方法所有终点的 I2 均大于 60%。在对同时检测hs-cTnI和T的研究进行的敏感性分析中,对任何CV终点的预测也没有差异:Hs-cTnI和T对非卧床成年人多种心血管疾病终点的预测没有明显差异,与年龄和既往心血管疾病无关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical chemistry
Clinical chemistry 医学-医学实验技术
CiteScore
11.30
自引率
4.30%
发文量
212
审稿时长
1.7 months
期刊介绍: Clinical Chemistry is a peer-reviewed scientific journal that is the premier publication for the science and practice of clinical laboratory medicine. It was established in 1955 and is associated with the Association for Diagnostics & Laboratory Medicine (ADLM). The journal focuses on laboratory diagnosis and management of patients, and has expanded to include other clinical laboratory disciplines such as genomics, hematology, microbiology, and toxicology. It also publishes articles relevant to clinical specialties including cardiology, endocrinology, gastroenterology, genetics, immunology, infectious diseases, maternal-fetal medicine, neurology, nutrition, oncology, and pediatrics. In addition to original research, editorials, and reviews, Clinical Chemistry features recurring sections such as clinical case studies, perspectives, podcasts, and Q&A articles. It has the highest impact factor among journals of clinical chemistry, laboratory medicine, pathology, analytical chemistry, transfusion medicine, and clinical microbiology. The journal is indexed in databases such as MEDLINE and Web of Science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信