Diagnostic Performance of Combined Conventional CT Imaging Features and Radiomics Signature in Differentiating Grade 1 Tumors from Higher-Grade Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms.

IF 4.5 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
Cancers Pub Date : 2025-03-20 DOI:10.3390/cancers17061047
Florent Tixier, Felipe Lopez-Ramirez, Alejandra Blanco, Ammar A Javed, Linda C Chu, Ralph H Hruban, Mohammad Yasrab, Daniel Fadaei Fouladi, Shahab Shayesteh, Saeed Ghandili, Elliot K Fishman, Satomi Kawamoto
{"title":"Diagnostic Performance of Combined Conventional CT Imaging Features and Radiomics Signature in Differentiating Grade 1 Tumors from Higher-Grade Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms.","authors":"Florent Tixier, Felipe Lopez-Ramirez, Alejandra Blanco, Ammar A Javed, Linda C Chu, Ralph H Hruban, Mohammad Yasrab, Daniel Fadaei Fouladi, Shahab Shayesteh, Saeed Ghandili, Elliot K Fishman, Satomi Kawamoto","doi":"10.3390/cancers17061047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/objectives: </strong>Accurate identification of grade 1 (G1) pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PanNETs) is crucial due to their rising incidence and emerging nonsurgical management strategies. This study evaluated whether combining conventional CT imaging features, CT radiomics features, and clinical data improves differentiation of G1 PanNETs from higher-grade tumors (G2/G3 PanNETs and pancreatic neuroendocrine carcinomas [PanNECs]) compared to using these features individually.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis included 133 patients with pathologically confirmed PanNETs or PanNECs (70 males, 63 females; mean age, 58.5 years) who underwent pancreas protocol CT. A total of 28 conventional imaging features, 4892 radiomics features, and clinical data (age, gender, and tumor location) were analyzed using a support vector machine (SVM) model. Data were divided into 70% training and 30% testing sets.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The SVM model using the top 10 conventional imaging features (e.g., suspicious lymph nodes and hypoattenuating tumors) achieved 75% sensitivity, 81% specificity, and 79% accuracy for identifying higher-grade tumors (G2/G3 PanNETs and PanNECs). The top 10 radiomics features yielded 94% sensitivity, 46% specificity, and 69% accuracy. Combining all features (imaging, radiomics, and clinical data) improved performance, with 94% sensitivity, 69% specificity, 79% accuracy, and an F1-score of 0.77. The radiomics score demonstrated an AUC of 0.85 in the training and 0.83 in the testing set.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Conventional imaging features provided higher specificity, while radiomics offered greater sensitivity for identifying higher-grade tumors. Integrating all three features improved diagnostic accuracy, highlighting their complementary roles. This combined model may serve as a valuable tool for distinguishing higher-grade tumors from G1 PanNETs and potentially guiding patient management.</p>","PeriodicalId":9681,"journal":{"name":"Cancers","volume":"17 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11941307/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancers","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17061047","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/objectives: Accurate identification of grade 1 (G1) pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PanNETs) is crucial due to their rising incidence and emerging nonsurgical management strategies. This study evaluated whether combining conventional CT imaging features, CT radiomics features, and clinical data improves differentiation of G1 PanNETs from higher-grade tumors (G2/G3 PanNETs and pancreatic neuroendocrine carcinomas [PanNECs]) compared to using these features individually.

Methods: A retrospective analysis included 133 patients with pathologically confirmed PanNETs or PanNECs (70 males, 63 females; mean age, 58.5 years) who underwent pancreas protocol CT. A total of 28 conventional imaging features, 4892 radiomics features, and clinical data (age, gender, and tumor location) were analyzed using a support vector machine (SVM) model. Data were divided into 70% training and 30% testing sets.

Results: The SVM model using the top 10 conventional imaging features (e.g., suspicious lymph nodes and hypoattenuating tumors) achieved 75% sensitivity, 81% specificity, and 79% accuracy for identifying higher-grade tumors (G2/G3 PanNETs and PanNECs). The top 10 radiomics features yielded 94% sensitivity, 46% specificity, and 69% accuracy. Combining all features (imaging, radiomics, and clinical data) improved performance, with 94% sensitivity, 69% specificity, 79% accuracy, and an F1-score of 0.77. The radiomics score demonstrated an AUC of 0.85 in the training and 0.83 in the testing set.

Conclusions: Conventional imaging features provided higher specificity, while radiomics offered greater sensitivity for identifying higher-grade tumors. Integrating all three features improved diagnostic accuracy, highlighting their complementary roles. This combined model may serve as a valuable tool for distinguishing higher-grade tumors from G1 PanNETs and potentially guiding patient management.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cancers
Cancers Medicine-Oncology
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
9.60%
发文量
5371
审稿时长
18.07 days
期刊介绍: Cancers (ISSN 2072-6694) is an international, peer-reviewed open access journal on oncology. It publishes reviews, regular research papers and short communications. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. The full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信