Dermoscopy of Basal Cell Carcinoma Part 3: Differential Diagnosis, Treatment Monitoring and Novel Technologies.

Abstract

Introduction: Basal cell carcinoma (BCC) is the most frequently diagnosed skin cancer globally. Despite the well-established dermoscopic features of BCC, overlapping characteristics with other benign and malignant skin conditions cause challenges in differential diagnosis. Part III of this review highlights the role of dermoscopy in differential diagnosis, treatment planning, therapy monitoring and the integration of novel technologies including ultraviolet-induced fluorescence dermoscopy (UVFD) and optical super-high magnification dermoscopy (OSHMD). Methods: A search of the PubMed database was conducted for studies reporting on advances in the dermoscopic assessment of BCC, including differential diagnosis, treatment, monitoring and novel diagnostic technologies. Results: Even entities with well-defined dermoscopic features distinguishing them from BCC can sometimes mimic BCC. Additionally, rare lesions such as neurothekeoma, reticulohistiocytoma, solitary circumscribed neuroma, dermal leiomyosarcoma and various adnexal tumors often remain dermoscopically indistinguishable from BCC, which underscores the importance of histopathology as the diagnostic gold standard. Dermoscopy aids in delineating the tumor margins, optimizing Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS) and traditional excision. It may also help to monitor therapeutic effects by detecting the disappearance of BCC patterns, the presence of residual tumor or recurrences. Dermoscopy may aid in the prediction of therapeutic responses to imiquimod, photodynamic therapy or vismodegib. UVFD and OSHMD appear to be valuable complementary diagnostic techniques for detecting BCC. UVFD seems to be particularly valuable for the detection of small tumors (<5 mm), facial lesions and nodular or non-pigmented BCC subtypes, while OSHMD is useful for the assessment of superficial and non-pigmented BCCs. Three-dimensional total-body photography enhances diagnostic precision but, so far, only when used in combination with traditional dermoscopy. Conclusions: Dermoscopy is valuable for margin delineation, therapy monitoring and differential diagnosis but can be inconclusive, which highlights the role of histopathology as the gold standard. Modifications in dermoscopy technique may further enhance its accuracy.