Comparison of 46 Cytokines in Peripheral Blood Between Patients with Papillary Thyroid Cancer and Healthy Individuals with AI-Driven Analysis to Distinguish Between the Two Groups.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Kyung-Jin Bae, Jun-Hyung Bae, Ae-Chin Oh, Chi-Hyun Cho
{"title":"Comparison of 46 Cytokines in Peripheral Blood Between Patients with Papillary Thyroid Cancer and Healthy Individuals with AI-Driven Analysis to Distinguish Between the Two Groups.","authors":"Kyung-Jin Bae, Jun-Hyung Bae, Ae-Chin Oh, Chi-Hyun Cho","doi":"10.3390/diagnostics15060791","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background</b>: Recent studies have analyzed some cytokines in patients with papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC), but simultaneous analysis of multiple cytokines remains rare. Nonetheless, the simultaneous assessment of multiple cytokines is increasingly recognized as crucial for understanding the cytokine characteristics and developmental mechanisms in PTC. In addition, studies applying artificial intelligence (AI) to discriminate patients with PTC based on serum multiple cytokine data have been performed rarely. Here, we measured and compared 46 cytokines in patients with PTC and healthy individuals, applying AI algorithms to classify the two groups. <b>Methods</b>: Blood serum was isolated from 63 patients with PTC and 63 control individuals. Forty-six cytokines were analyzed simultaneously using Luminex assay Human XL Cytokine Panel. Several laboratory findings were identified from electronic medical records. Student's <i>t</i>-test or the Mann-Whitney U test were performed to analyze the difference between the two groups. As AI classification algorithms to categorize patients with PTC, K-nearest neighbor function, Naïve Bayes classifier, logistic regression, support vector machine, and eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) were employed. The SHAP analysis assessed how individual parameters influence the classification of patients with PTC. <b>Results</b>: Cytokine levels, including GM-CSF, IFN-γ, IL-1ra, IL-7, IL-10, IL-12p40, IL-15, CCL20/MIP-α, CCL5/RANTES, and TNF-α, were significantly higher in PTC than in controls. Conversely, CD40 Ligand, EGF, IL-1β, PDGF-AA, and TGF-α exhibited significantly lower concentrations in PTC compared to controls. Among the five classification algorithms evaluated, XGBoost demonstrated superior performance in terms of accuracy, precision, sensitivity (recall), specificity, F1-score, and ROC-AUC score. Notably, EGF and IL-10 were identified as critical cytokines that significantly contributed to the differentiation of patients with PTC. <b>Conclusions</b>: A total of 5 cytokines showed lower levels in the PTC group than in the control, while 10 cytokines showed higher levels. While XGBoost demonstrated the best performance in discriminating between the PTC group and the control group, EGF and IL-10 were considered to be closely associated with PTC.</p>","PeriodicalId":11225,"journal":{"name":"Diagnostics","volume":"15 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11940922/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diagnostics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics15060791","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Recent studies have analyzed some cytokines in patients with papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC), but simultaneous analysis of multiple cytokines remains rare. Nonetheless, the simultaneous assessment of multiple cytokines is increasingly recognized as crucial for understanding the cytokine characteristics and developmental mechanisms in PTC. In addition, studies applying artificial intelligence (AI) to discriminate patients with PTC based on serum multiple cytokine data have been performed rarely. Here, we measured and compared 46 cytokines in patients with PTC and healthy individuals, applying AI algorithms to classify the two groups. Methods: Blood serum was isolated from 63 patients with PTC and 63 control individuals. Forty-six cytokines were analyzed simultaneously using Luminex assay Human XL Cytokine Panel. Several laboratory findings were identified from electronic medical records. Student's t-test or the Mann-Whitney U test were performed to analyze the difference between the two groups. As AI classification algorithms to categorize patients with PTC, K-nearest neighbor function, Naïve Bayes classifier, logistic regression, support vector machine, and eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) were employed. The SHAP analysis assessed how individual parameters influence the classification of patients with PTC. Results: Cytokine levels, including GM-CSF, IFN-γ, IL-1ra, IL-7, IL-10, IL-12p40, IL-15, CCL20/MIP-α, CCL5/RANTES, and TNF-α, were significantly higher in PTC than in controls. Conversely, CD40 Ligand, EGF, IL-1β, PDGF-AA, and TGF-α exhibited significantly lower concentrations in PTC compared to controls. Among the five classification algorithms evaluated, XGBoost demonstrated superior performance in terms of accuracy, precision, sensitivity (recall), specificity, F1-score, and ROC-AUC score. Notably, EGF and IL-10 were identified as critical cytokines that significantly contributed to the differentiation of patients with PTC. Conclusions: A total of 5 cytokines showed lower levels in the PTC group than in the control, while 10 cytokines showed higher levels. While XGBoost demonstrated the best performance in discriminating between the PTC group and the control group, EGF and IL-10 were considered to be closely associated with PTC.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Diagnostics
Diagnostics Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Clinical Biochemistry
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
8.30%
发文量
2699
审稿时长
19.64 days
期刊介绍: Diagnostics (ISSN 2075-4418) is an international scholarly open access journal on medical diagnostics. It publishes original research articles, reviews, communications and short notes on the research and development of medical diagnostics. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical research in as much detail as possible. Full experimental and/or methodological details must be provided for research articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信