Uptake and elimination of per-and polyfluoroalkyl substances in earthworms exposed to spiked artificial soil or aqueous medium.

IF 3.6 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Guilherme Lotufo, Robert E Boyd, Paige M Krupa, Zhao Yang, Jennifer E Guelfo, Michael Simini, Roman G Kuperman
{"title":"Uptake and elimination of per-and polyfluoroalkyl substances in earthworms exposed to spiked artificial soil or aqueous medium.","authors":"Guilherme Lotufo, Robert E Boyd, Paige M Krupa, Zhao Yang, Jennifer E Guelfo, Michael Simini, Roman G Kuperman","doi":"10.1093/etojnl/vgaf083","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We investigated the accumulation of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in earthworms (Eisenia andrei). Uptake kinetics and bioaccumulation factors (BAFs) were determined using a mixture of 16 PFAS by exposing earthworms to spiked artificial soil for up to 28 d. Two treatments were used, with the low treatment targeting environmentally relevant concentrations. The concentrations of PFAS remained relatively unchanged during the exposures and statistically significant rates of uptake were estimated for most individual PFAS. For the 0.01 mg/kg treatment (target concentration of each PFAS), steady state was reached for all PFAS except PFHpS, PFHxS, PFOS, PFTeDA, and PFTrDA. For the 0.01 mg/kg treatment, bioaccumulation factors (BAF; kg/kg-dry wt.) ranged from 4 to 49 for most PFAS, but were higher for PFHxS (72), PFTeDA (271), and PFUnA (299). Organic-carbon-normalized BAFs were within the range of published values. The BAF values increased with increasing length of the alkyl chain for perfluoroalkyl carboxylic acids (PFCAs), but not for perfluoroalkyl sulfonic acids (PFSAs). Uptake rates and BAFs were lower for the 1 mg/kg treatment, typically by over one order of magnitude, likely because of sublethal physiological impairment. Fast and steep decreases in tissue concentrations of PFAS occurred when earthworms were transferred to clean soil, even for long chain PFAS, overall agreeing with previous reports. However, measured elimination rates were faster than predicted from the uptake experiments and the causes remain unknown. Bioaccumulation of PFAS was also investigated in exposures to aqueous medium for up to 7 d to derive bioconcentration factors (BCFs). Comparison of BCFs and BAFs suggests that uptake from soil may have higher relevance compared to dermal uptake from porewater for long-chain PFCAs and PFSAs.</p>","PeriodicalId":11793,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/etojnl/vgaf083","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We investigated the accumulation of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in earthworms (Eisenia andrei). Uptake kinetics and bioaccumulation factors (BAFs) were determined using a mixture of 16 PFAS by exposing earthworms to spiked artificial soil for up to 28 d. Two treatments were used, with the low treatment targeting environmentally relevant concentrations. The concentrations of PFAS remained relatively unchanged during the exposures and statistically significant rates of uptake were estimated for most individual PFAS. For the 0.01 mg/kg treatment (target concentration of each PFAS), steady state was reached for all PFAS except PFHpS, PFHxS, PFOS, PFTeDA, and PFTrDA. For the 0.01 mg/kg treatment, bioaccumulation factors (BAF; kg/kg-dry wt.) ranged from 4 to 49 for most PFAS, but were higher for PFHxS (72), PFTeDA (271), and PFUnA (299). Organic-carbon-normalized BAFs were within the range of published values. The BAF values increased with increasing length of the alkyl chain for perfluoroalkyl carboxylic acids (PFCAs), but not for perfluoroalkyl sulfonic acids (PFSAs). Uptake rates and BAFs were lower for the 1 mg/kg treatment, typically by over one order of magnitude, likely because of sublethal physiological impairment. Fast and steep decreases in tissue concentrations of PFAS occurred when earthworms were transferred to clean soil, even for long chain PFAS, overall agreeing with previous reports. However, measured elimination rates were faster than predicted from the uptake experiments and the causes remain unknown. Bioaccumulation of PFAS was also investigated in exposures to aqueous medium for up to 7 d to derive bioconcentration factors (BCFs). Comparison of BCFs and BAFs suggests that uptake from soil may have higher relevance compared to dermal uptake from porewater for long-chain PFCAs and PFSAs.

蚯蚓在人工土壤或水介质中吸收和消除全氟烷基和多氟烷基物质。
我们研究了全氟和多氟烷基物质(PFAS)在蚯蚓(Eisenia andrei)体内的积累情况。通过将蚯蚓暴露在添加了PFAS的人造土壤中长达28天,测定了16种PFAS混合物的吸收动力学和生物累积因子(BAFs)。在暴露期间,全氟辛烷磺酸的浓度保持相对不变,而且据估计,大多数单个全氟辛烷磺酸的吸收率在统计学上具有显著意义。对于 0.01 毫克/千克的处理(每种 PFAS 的目标浓度),除 PFHpS、PFHxS、PFOS、PFTeDA 和 PFTrDA 外,所有 PFAS 都达到了稳定状态。在 0.01 毫克/千克的处理中,大多数 PFAS 的生物累积系数(BAF;千克/千克干重)介于 4 到 49 之间,但 PFHxS(72)、PFTeDA(271)和 PFUnA(299)的生物累积系数较高。有机碳归一化 BAF 值在已公布值的范围内。全氟烷基羧酸(PFCAs)的 BAF 值随着烷基链长度的增加而增加,但全氟烷基磺酸(PFSA)的 BAF 值则没有增加。1 毫克/千克处理的吸收率和生物累积系数较低,通常低一个数量级以上,这可能是由于亚致死生理损伤造成的。当蚯蚓转移到干净的土壤中时,组织中的全氟辛烷磺酸浓度会快速急剧下降,即使是长链全氟辛烷磺酸也是如此,这与之前的报告基本一致。不过,测得的消除速度比吸收实验预测的要快,原因尚不清楚。还研究了在水介质中暴露长达 7 天的全氟辛烷磺酸的生物累积性,以得出生物浓缩系数 (BCF)。生物浓缩系数和生物富集系数的比较表明,对于长链全氟辛烷磺酸和全氟辛烷磺酸而言,从土壤中吸收可能比从孔隙水中皮肤吸收具有更高的相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
9.80%
发文量
265
审稿时长
3.4 months
期刊介绍: The Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry (SETAC) publishes two journals: Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry (ET&C) and Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management (IEAM). Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry is dedicated to furthering scientific knowledge and disseminating information on environmental toxicology and chemistry, including the application of these sciences to risk assessment.[...] Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry is interdisciplinary in scope and integrates the fields of environmental toxicology; environmental, analytical, and molecular chemistry; ecology; physiology; biochemistry; microbiology; genetics; genomics; environmental engineering; chemical, environmental, and biological modeling; epidemiology; and earth sciences. ET&C seeks to publish papers describing original experimental or theoretical work that significantly advances understanding in the area of environmental toxicology, environmental chemistry and hazard/risk assessment. Emphasis is given to papers that enhance capabilities for the prediction, measurement, and assessment of the fate and effects of chemicals in the environment, rather than simply providing additional data. The scientific impact of papers is judged in terms of the breadth and depth of the findings and the expected influence on existing or future scientific practice. Methodological papers must make clear not only how the work differs from existing practice, but the significance of these differences to the field. Site-based research or monitoring must have regional or global implications beyond the particular site, such as evaluating processes, mechanisms, or theory under a natural environmental setting.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信