Selecting and tailoring implementation strategies for deimplementing fall prevention alarms in US hospitals: a group concept mapping study.

IF 5.6 1区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Kea Turner, Mona Al Taweel, Carrie Petrucci, Scott Rosas, Catima Potter, Emily Cramer, Ronald I Shorr, Lorraine C Mion, Molly McNett
{"title":"Selecting and tailoring implementation strategies for deimplementing fall prevention alarms in US hospitals: a group concept mapping study.","authors":"Kea Turner, Mona Al Taweel, Carrie Petrucci, Scott Rosas, Catima Potter, Emily Cramer, Ronald I Shorr, Lorraine C Mion, Molly McNett","doi":"10.1136/bmjqs-2024-018391","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Many hospitals use fall prevention alarms, despite the limited evidence of effectiveness. The objectives of this study were (1) to identify, conceptualise and select strategies to deimplement fall prevention alarms and (2) to obtain feedback from key stakeholders on tailoring selected deimplementation strategies for the local hospital context.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Hospital staff working on fall prevention participated in group concept mapping (GCM) to brainstorm strategies that could be used for fall prevention alarm deimplementation, sort statements into conceptually similar categories and rate statements based on importance and current use. Hospital staff also participated in site-specific focus groups to discuss current fall prevention practices, strategies prioritised through GCM and theory-informed strategies recommended by the study team, and potential barriers/facilitators to deimplementing fall prevention alarms.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>90 hospital staff across 13 hospitals brainstormed, rated and sorted strategies for alarm deimplementation. Strategies that were rated as highly important but underutilised included creating/revising staff roles to support fall prevention (eg, hiring or designating mobility technicians) and revising policies and procedures to encourage tailored rather than universal fall precautions. 192 hospital staff across 22 hospitals participated in site-specific focus groups. Participants provided feedback on each strategy's relevance for their site (eg, if site currently has a mobility technician) and local barriers or facilitators (eg, importance of having separate champions for day and night shift). Findings were used to develop a tailored implementation package for each site that included a core set of strategies (eg, external facilitation, education, audit-and-feedback, champions), a select set of site-specific strategies (eg, designating a mobility technician to support fall prevention) and guidance for how to operationalise and implement each strategy given local barriers and facilitators.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Findings from this study can be used to inform future programmes and policies aimed at deimplementing fall prevention alarms in hospitals.</p>","PeriodicalId":9077,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Quality & Safety","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Quality & Safety","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2024-018391","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Many hospitals use fall prevention alarms, despite the limited evidence of effectiveness. The objectives of this study were (1) to identify, conceptualise and select strategies to deimplement fall prevention alarms and (2) to obtain feedback from key stakeholders on tailoring selected deimplementation strategies for the local hospital context.

Methods: Hospital staff working on fall prevention participated in group concept mapping (GCM) to brainstorm strategies that could be used for fall prevention alarm deimplementation, sort statements into conceptually similar categories and rate statements based on importance and current use. Hospital staff also participated in site-specific focus groups to discuss current fall prevention practices, strategies prioritised through GCM and theory-informed strategies recommended by the study team, and potential barriers/facilitators to deimplementing fall prevention alarms.

Results: 90 hospital staff across 13 hospitals brainstormed, rated and sorted strategies for alarm deimplementation. Strategies that were rated as highly important but underutilised included creating/revising staff roles to support fall prevention (eg, hiring or designating mobility technicians) and revising policies and procedures to encourage tailored rather than universal fall precautions. 192 hospital staff across 22 hospitals participated in site-specific focus groups. Participants provided feedback on each strategy's relevance for their site (eg, if site currently has a mobility technician) and local barriers or facilitators (eg, importance of having separate champions for day and night shift). Findings were used to develop a tailored implementation package for each site that included a core set of strategies (eg, external facilitation, education, audit-and-feedback, champions), a select set of site-specific strategies (eg, designating a mobility technician to support fall prevention) and guidance for how to operationalise and implement each strategy given local barriers and facilitators.

Conclusion: Findings from this study can be used to inform future programmes and policies aimed at deimplementing fall prevention alarms in hospitals.

选择和剪裁实施策略,取消实施跌倒预防警报在美国医院:一组概念映射研究。
目的:尽管有效性证据有限,但许多医院使用预防跌倒警报。本研究的目的是(1)确定、概念化和选择取消实施预防跌倒警报的策略;(2)从关键利益相关者那里获得针对当地医院环境量身定制取消实施策略的反馈。方法:医院预防跌倒工作人员参与小组概念映射(GCM),集思广益可用于预防跌倒警报解除的策略,将陈述分类为概念相似的类别,并根据重要性和当前使用情况对陈述进行评分。医院工作人员还参加了特定地点的焦点小组,讨论当前的预防跌倒实践、通过GCM优先考虑的策略和研究小组推荐的理论知情策略,以及取消实施预防跌倒警报的潜在障碍/促进因素。结果:来自13家医院的90名医院工作人员进行了头脑风暴,对警报解除策略进行了评级和分类。被评为非常重要但未得到充分利用的战略包括建立/修改工作人员的角色,以支持预防跌倒(例如,雇用或指定移动技术人员),以及修改政策和程序,以鼓励量身定制而非普遍的跌倒预防措施。22家医院的192名医院工作人员参加了具体地点的焦点小组。参与者提供了关于每个策略与他们网站的相关性(例如,如果网站目前有移动技术人员)和当地障碍或促进者(例如,白班和夜班有单独的倡导者的重要性)的反馈。研究结果用于为每个站点制定量身定制的实施方案,其中包括一套核心战略(例如,外部促进、教育、审计和反馈、冠军),一套特定于站点的战略(例如,指定一名移动技术人员来支持预防跌倒),以及针对当地障碍和促进因素如何实施和实施每项战略的指导。结论:本研究的结果可用于为未来的规划和政策提供信息,旨在在医院取消实施预防跌倒警报。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMJ Quality & Safety
BMJ Quality & Safety HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
9.80
自引率
7.40%
发文量
104
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: BMJ Quality & Safety (previously Quality & Safety in Health Care) is an international peer review publication providing research, opinions, debates and reviews for academics, clinicians and healthcare managers focused on the quality and safety of health care and the science of improvement. The journal receives approximately 1000 manuscripts a year and has an acceptance rate for original research of 12%. Time from submission to first decision averages 22 days and accepted articles are typically published online within 20 days. Its current impact factor is 3.281.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信