Relationship between prepregnancy BMI and gestational weight gain(GWG) with preeclampsia: a study based on restricted cubic spline.

IF 2.8 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Luhan Zhang, Juan Ding, Jiangli Liu, Jing Ma, Rui Shi, Tian Chen, Guifeng Ding
{"title":"Relationship between prepregnancy BMI and gestational weight gain(GWG) with preeclampsia: a study based on restricted cubic spline.","authors":"Luhan Zhang, Juan Ding, Jiangli Liu, Jing Ma, Rui Shi, Tian Chen, Guifeng Ding","doi":"10.1186/s12884-025-07449-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the nonlinear associations between prepregnancy body mass index(BMI), gestational weight gain(GWG), and the risk of preeclampsia(PE) using maternal and infant cohort data, thereby providing a scientific foundation for preventive strategies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Pregnant women with regular obstetric checkups in Urumqi Youai Hospital were selected as study subjects from January 2020 to June 2024. They were divided into the PE group and the non-PE group. Baseline information and pregnancy outcomes were collected, and logistic regression analysis was employed to ascertain the impacts of diverse factors on the odds of developing PE; the restricted cubic spline was used to test the nonlinear relationship between prepregnancy BMI and GWG with PE.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>13,294 pregnant women were included in the study, and 559 (4.20%) had PE.The prevalence of PE in underweight, normal-weight, overweight, and obese women was 1.72%, 2.85%, 6.60%, and 16.05%, respectively. However, after adjusting for confounders, only overweight and obesity were significantly associated with elevated PE odds. Logistic regression results showed that the OR was 1.68(95% CI:1.30-2.18) for the comparison between overweight and normal BMI groups, the OR was 3.16(95%CI:2.08-4.79) for the comparison between obesity and normal BMI groups. Restricted cubic spline showed that the association between prepregnancy BMI and the odds of PE showed an inverse L-shaped curve, with an inflection point of 21.5 kg/m<sup>2</sup>; the association between GWG and the odds of PE showed a J-shaped curve, with a GWG of 10.94-15.90 kg being at the lowest odds for the development of PE. For pregnant women with prepregnancy underweight, the odds of PE were significantly increased when their GWG exceeded 21.63 kg. Similarly, for those with prepregnancy normal weight, a significant elevation in the odds of PE was observed when their GWG surpassed 15.90 kg.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There is a non-linear relationship between prepregnancy BMI, GWG, and PE, and prepregnancy weight management and gestational weight monitoring are important for the prevention of PE.</p>","PeriodicalId":9033,"journal":{"name":"BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth","volume":"25 1","pages":"360"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11948702/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-025-07449-8","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the nonlinear associations between prepregnancy body mass index(BMI), gestational weight gain(GWG), and the risk of preeclampsia(PE) using maternal and infant cohort data, thereby providing a scientific foundation for preventive strategies.

Methods: Pregnant women with regular obstetric checkups in Urumqi Youai Hospital were selected as study subjects from January 2020 to June 2024. They were divided into the PE group and the non-PE group. Baseline information and pregnancy outcomes were collected, and logistic regression analysis was employed to ascertain the impacts of diverse factors on the odds of developing PE; the restricted cubic spline was used to test the nonlinear relationship between prepregnancy BMI and GWG with PE.

Results: 13,294 pregnant women were included in the study, and 559 (4.20%) had PE.The prevalence of PE in underweight, normal-weight, overweight, and obese women was 1.72%, 2.85%, 6.60%, and 16.05%, respectively. However, after adjusting for confounders, only overweight and obesity were significantly associated with elevated PE odds. Logistic regression results showed that the OR was 1.68(95% CI:1.30-2.18) for the comparison between overweight and normal BMI groups, the OR was 3.16(95%CI:2.08-4.79) for the comparison between obesity and normal BMI groups. Restricted cubic spline showed that the association between prepregnancy BMI and the odds of PE showed an inverse L-shaped curve, with an inflection point of 21.5 kg/m2; the association between GWG and the odds of PE showed a J-shaped curve, with a GWG of 10.94-15.90 kg being at the lowest odds for the development of PE. For pregnant women with prepregnancy underweight, the odds of PE were significantly increased when their GWG exceeded 21.63 kg. Similarly, for those with prepregnancy normal weight, a significant elevation in the odds of PE was observed when their GWG surpassed 15.90 kg.

Conclusion: There is a non-linear relationship between prepregnancy BMI, GWG, and PE, and prepregnancy weight management and gestational weight monitoring are important for the prevention of PE.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
6.50%
发文量
845
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Pregnancy & Childbirth is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of pregnancy and childbirth. The journal welcomes submissions on the biomedical aspects of pregnancy, breastfeeding, labor, maternal health, maternity care, trends and sociological aspects of pregnancy and childbirth.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信