Anja Heselich, Pauline Neff, Joanna Śmieszek-Wilczewska, Robert Sader, Shahram Ghanaati
{"title":"Introduction of a Semi-Quantitative Image-Based Analysis Tool for CBCT-Based Evaluation of Bone Regeneration in Tooth Extraction Sockets.","authors":"Anja Heselich, Pauline Neff, Joanna Śmieszek-Wilczewska, Robert Sader, Shahram Ghanaati","doi":"10.3390/bioengineering12030301","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>After tooth extraction, resorptive changes in extraction sockets and the adjacent alveolar ridge can affect subsequent tooth replacement and implantation. Several surgical concepts, including the application of autologous blood concentrate platelet-rich fibrin (PRF), aim to reduce these changes. While PRF's wound-healing and pain-relieving effects are well-documented, its impact on bone regeneration is less clear due to varying PRF protocols and measurement methods for bone regeneration. This study aimed to develop a precise, easy-to-use non-invasive radiological evaluation method that examines the entire extraction socket to assess bone regeneration using CBCT data from clinical trials. The method, based on the freely available Image J-based software \"Fiji\", proved to be precise, reproducible, and transferable. As limitation remains the time requirement and its exclusive focus on radiological bone regeneration. Nevertheless, the method presented here is more precise than the ones currently described in the literature, as it evaluates the entire socket rather than partial areas. The application of the novel method to measure mineralized socket volume and radiological bone density of newly formed bone in a randomized, controlled clinical trial assessing solid PRF for socket preservation in premolar and molar sockets showed only slight, statistically non-significant trends toward better regeneration in the PRF group compared to natural healing.</p>","PeriodicalId":8874,"journal":{"name":"Bioengineering","volume":"12 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11939505/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bioengineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering12030301","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
After tooth extraction, resorptive changes in extraction sockets and the adjacent alveolar ridge can affect subsequent tooth replacement and implantation. Several surgical concepts, including the application of autologous blood concentrate platelet-rich fibrin (PRF), aim to reduce these changes. While PRF's wound-healing and pain-relieving effects are well-documented, its impact on bone regeneration is less clear due to varying PRF protocols and measurement methods for bone regeneration. This study aimed to develop a precise, easy-to-use non-invasive radiological evaluation method that examines the entire extraction socket to assess bone regeneration using CBCT data from clinical trials. The method, based on the freely available Image J-based software "Fiji", proved to be precise, reproducible, and transferable. As limitation remains the time requirement and its exclusive focus on radiological bone regeneration. Nevertheless, the method presented here is more precise than the ones currently described in the literature, as it evaluates the entire socket rather than partial areas. The application of the novel method to measure mineralized socket volume and radiological bone density of newly formed bone in a randomized, controlled clinical trial assessing solid PRF for socket preservation in premolar and molar sockets showed only slight, statistically non-significant trends toward better regeneration in the PRF group compared to natural healing.
期刊介绍:
Aims
Bioengineering (ISSN 2306-5354) provides an advanced forum for the science and technology of bioengineering. It publishes original research papers, comprehensive reviews, communications and case reports. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. All aspects of bioengineering are welcomed from theoretical concepts to education and applications. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. The full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced. There are, in addition, four key features of this Journal:
● We are introducing a new concept in scientific and technical publications “The Translational Case Report in Bioengineering”. It is a descriptive explanatory analysis of a transformative or translational event. Understanding that the goal of bioengineering scholarship is to advance towards a transformative or clinical solution to an identified transformative/clinical need, the translational case report is used to explore causation in order to find underlying principles that may guide other similar transformative/translational undertakings.
● Manuscripts regarding research proposals and research ideas will be particularly welcomed.
● Electronic files and software regarding the full details of the calculation and experimental procedure, if unable to be published in a normal way, can be deposited as supplementary material.
● We also accept manuscripts communicating to a broader audience with regard to research projects financed with public funds.
Scope
● Bionics and biological cybernetics: implantology; bio–abio interfaces
● Bioelectronics: wearable electronics; implantable electronics; “more than Moore” electronics; bioelectronics devices
● Bioprocess and biosystems engineering and applications: bioprocess design; biocatalysis; bioseparation and bioreactors; bioinformatics; bioenergy; etc.
● Biomolecular, cellular and tissue engineering and applications: tissue engineering; chromosome engineering; embryo engineering; cellular, molecular and synthetic biology; metabolic engineering; bio-nanotechnology; micro/nano technologies; genetic engineering; transgenic technology
● Biomedical engineering and applications: biomechatronics; biomedical electronics; biomechanics; biomaterials; biomimetics; biomedical diagnostics; biomedical therapy; biomedical devices; sensors and circuits; biomedical imaging and medical information systems; implants and regenerative medicine; neurotechnology; clinical engineering; rehabilitation engineering
● Biochemical engineering and applications: metabolic pathway engineering; modeling and simulation
● Translational bioengineering