Do I-PRF adjuvant injections in TMJ arthrocentesis have a cumulative physiological effect? A retrospective cohort study.

IF 2.6 2区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Tahsin Tepecik, Mert Zöngör, Ecem Gedik
{"title":"Do I-PRF adjuvant injections in TMJ arthrocentesis have a cumulative physiological effect? A retrospective cohort study.","authors":"Tahsin Tepecik, Mert Zöngör, Ecem Gedik","doi":"10.1186/s12903-025-05824-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study was to compare the therapeutic outcomes of single versus multiple injectable platelet-rich fibrin (i-PRF) injections after arthrocentesis in patients with temporomandibular joint osteoarthritis (TMJ-OA). The objective was to evaluate and compare TMJ pain and mobility at the 1st, 6th, and 12th months postoperatively.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study included 85 female patients (age: 31-73 years, mean ± sd: 54.9 ± 8.8) who underwent arthrocentesis with i-PRF injections from June 2018 to November 2021, diagnosed with osteoarthritis based on the Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (DC/TMD). Patients had no prior use of occlusal splint. During follow-up visits, pain was evaluated with a visual analog scale (pVAS) during function and maximum interincisal opening (MIO) was measured to assess jaw mobility. The study included patient follow-up records at four time points: preoperative (T0), 1 month postoperative (T1), 6 months postoperative (T2), and 12 months postoperative (T3). The primary outcome variable was pVAS at T3, secondary outcome variables were pVAS at T1 and T2, and MIO at T1, T2, and T3.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No significant differences were found in joint pain or mobility between groups at follow-ups (> 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Both groups showed similar outcomes in terms of pain and mobility over a 12-month period. Increasing the frequency of i-PRF injections does not appear to have an impact on therapeutic outcomes in patients with TMJOA. Given the retrospective design of this study, it is important to evaluate the results with caution.</p>","PeriodicalId":9072,"journal":{"name":"BMC Oral Health","volume":"25 1","pages":"445"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11948632/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Oral Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-025-05824-7","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the therapeutic outcomes of single versus multiple injectable platelet-rich fibrin (i-PRF) injections after arthrocentesis in patients with temporomandibular joint osteoarthritis (TMJ-OA). The objective was to evaluate and compare TMJ pain and mobility at the 1st, 6th, and 12th months postoperatively.

Methods: This retrospective cohort study included 85 female patients (age: 31-73 years, mean ± sd: 54.9 ± 8.8) who underwent arthrocentesis with i-PRF injections from June 2018 to November 2021, diagnosed with osteoarthritis based on the Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (DC/TMD). Patients had no prior use of occlusal splint. During follow-up visits, pain was evaluated with a visual analog scale (pVAS) during function and maximum interincisal opening (MIO) was measured to assess jaw mobility. The study included patient follow-up records at four time points: preoperative (T0), 1 month postoperative (T1), 6 months postoperative (T2), and 12 months postoperative (T3). The primary outcome variable was pVAS at T3, secondary outcome variables were pVAS at T1 and T2, and MIO at T1, T2, and T3.

Results: No significant differences were found in joint pain or mobility between groups at follow-ups (> 0.05).

Conclusions: Both groups showed similar outcomes in terms of pain and mobility over a 12-month period. Increasing the frequency of i-PRF injections does not appear to have an impact on therapeutic outcomes in patients with TMJOA. Given the retrospective design of this study, it is important to evaluate the results with caution.

I-PRF佐剂注射在TMJ关节置换术中是否具有累积生理效应?回顾性队列研究。
目的:本研究的目的是比较单次和多次注射富血小板纤维蛋白(i-PRF)注射对颞下颌关节骨性关节炎(TMJ-OA)患者关节穿刺后的治疗效果。目的是评估和比较术后第1、6和12个月的TMJ疼痛和活动度。方法:本回顾性队列研究纳入了85例女性患者(年龄:31-73岁,平均±sd: 54.9±8.8),于2018年6月至2021年11月接受i-PRF注射关节穿刺,根据颞下颌疾病诊断标准(DC/TMD)诊断为骨关节炎。患者未使用过咬合夹板。在随访期间,使用视觉模拟量表(pVAS)评估功能期间的疼痛,并测量最大内开度(MIO)来评估下颌活动。研究包括术前(T0)、术后1个月(T1)、术后6个月(T2)和术后12个月(T3)四个时间点的患者随访记录。主要结局变量为T3时的pVAS,次要结局变量为T1和T2时的pVAS,以及T1、T2和T3时的MIO。结果:随访时,两组患者关节疼痛、活动能力差异无统计学意义(>.05)。结论:在12个月的时间里,两组在疼痛和活动方面表现出相似的结果。增加i-PRF注射频率似乎对TMJOA患者的治疗结果没有影响。考虑到本研究的回顾性设计,谨慎评估结果很重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Oral Health
BMC Oral Health DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
6.90%
发文量
481
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Oral Health is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of disorders of the mouth, teeth and gums, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信