Commercial NIRS May Not Detect Hemispheric Regional Disparity in Continuously Measured COx/COx-a: An Exploratory Healthy and Cranial Trauma Time-Series Analysis.

IF 3.8 3区 医学 Q2 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Amanjyot Singh Sainbhi, Logan Froese, Kevin Y Stein, Nuray Vakitbilir, Alwyn Gomez, Abrar Islam, Tobias Bergmann, Noah Silvaggio, Mansoor Hayat, Frederick A Zeiler
{"title":"Commercial NIRS May Not Detect Hemispheric Regional Disparity in Continuously Measured COx/COx-a: An Exploratory Healthy and Cranial Trauma Time-Series Analysis.","authors":"Amanjyot Singh Sainbhi, Logan Froese, Kevin Y Stein, Nuray Vakitbilir, Alwyn Gomez, Abrar Islam, Tobias Bergmann, Noah Silvaggio, Mansoor Hayat, Frederick A Zeiler","doi":"10.3390/bioengineering12030247","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Continuous metrics of cerebral autoregulation (CA) assessment have been developed using various multimodal cerebral physiological monitoring devices. However, CA regional disparity remains unclear in states of health and disease. Leveraging existing archived data sources, we preliminarily evaluated regional hemispheric disparity in CA using the near infrared spectroscopy (NIRS)-derived cerebral oximetry index (COx/COx-a). Along with bilateral NIRS, regional cerebral oxygen saturation, arterial blood pressure, cerebral perfusion pressure, and bilateral COx/COx-a were derived using three different temporal resolutions-10 s, 1 min, and 5 min-based on non-overlapping mean values. The regional disparity between hemispheres was evaluated based on median and median absolute deviation. Further, patient-level autoregressive integrative moving average models were calculated for each signal stream and used to generate personalized vector autoregressive models. Multi-variate cerebral physiologic relationships between hemispheres were assessed via impulse response functions and Granger causality analyses. Data from 102 healthy control volunteers, 27 spinal surgery patients, and 95 TBI patients (varying in frontal lobe pathology impacting the optode path; 64 without bifrontal lobe pathology, 15 without left frontal lobe pathology, 11 without right frontal lobe pathology, and 5 with bifrontal lobe pathology) were retrospectively analyzed. For subjects with or without cranial pathology, no difference in COx/COx-a was found between hemispheres regardless of the analytic method. In TBI patients without pathology underneath the NIRS sensor, distant parenchymal injury does not seem to have an effect on the CA of uninjured frontal lobes. Further work is required to characterize regional disparities with multi-channel CA measurements in healthy and disease states.</p>","PeriodicalId":8874,"journal":{"name":"Bioengineering","volume":"12 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11939202/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bioengineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering12030247","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Continuous metrics of cerebral autoregulation (CA) assessment have been developed using various multimodal cerebral physiological monitoring devices. However, CA regional disparity remains unclear in states of health and disease. Leveraging existing archived data sources, we preliminarily evaluated regional hemispheric disparity in CA using the near infrared spectroscopy (NIRS)-derived cerebral oximetry index (COx/COx-a). Along with bilateral NIRS, regional cerebral oxygen saturation, arterial blood pressure, cerebral perfusion pressure, and bilateral COx/COx-a were derived using three different temporal resolutions-10 s, 1 min, and 5 min-based on non-overlapping mean values. The regional disparity between hemispheres was evaluated based on median and median absolute deviation. Further, patient-level autoregressive integrative moving average models were calculated for each signal stream and used to generate personalized vector autoregressive models. Multi-variate cerebral physiologic relationships between hemispheres were assessed via impulse response functions and Granger causality analyses. Data from 102 healthy control volunteers, 27 spinal surgery patients, and 95 TBI patients (varying in frontal lobe pathology impacting the optode path; 64 without bifrontal lobe pathology, 15 without left frontal lobe pathology, 11 without right frontal lobe pathology, and 5 with bifrontal lobe pathology) were retrospectively analyzed. For subjects with or without cranial pathology, no difference in COx/COx-a was found between hemispheres regardless of the analytic method. In TBI patients without pathology underneath the NIRS sensor, distant parenchymal injury does not seem to have an effect on the CA of uninjured frontal lobes. Further work is required to characterize regional disparities with multi-channel CA measurements in healthy and disease states.

人们利用各种多模态脑生理监测设备开发出了连续的脑自动调节(CA)评估指标。然而,在健康和疾病状态下,CA 的区域差异仍不明确。利用现有的存档数据源,我们使用近红外光谱(NIRS)得出的脑氧饱和度指数(COx/COx-a)初步评估了CA的区域半球差异。在使用双侧近红外光谱的同时,还使用三种不同的时间分辨率--10 秒、1 分钟和 5 分钟,根据不重叠的平均值得出了区域脑氧饱和度、动脉血压、脑灌注压和双侧 COx/COx-a。半球之间的区域差异根据中位数和中位数绝对偏差进行评估。此外,还计算了每个信号流的患者级自回归积分移动平均模型,并用于生成个性化的向量自回归模型。通过脉冲响应函数和格兰杰因果关系分析评估了大脑半球之间的多变量生理关系。对 102 名健康对照志愿者、27 名脊柱手术患者和 95 名创伤性脑损伤患者(因额叶病变对光码路径的影响而异;64 人无双额叶病变,15 人无左额叶病变,11 人无右额叶病变,5 人有双额叶病变)的数据进行了回顾性分析。对于有无颅骨病变的受试者,无论采用哪种分析方法,半球之间的 COx/COx-a 均无差异。在近红外传感器下方没有病变的创伤性脑损伤患者中,远处的实质损伤似乎对未受伤额叶的CA没有影响。需要进一步开展工作,利用多通道 CA 测量健康和疾病状态下的区域差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Bioengineering
Bioengineering Chemical Engineering-Bioengineering
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
8.70%
发文量
661
期刊介绍: Aims Bioengineering (ISSN 2306-5354) provides an advanced forum for the science and technology of bioengineering. It publishes original research papers, comprehensive reviews, communications and case reports. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. All aspects of bioengineering are welcomed from theoretical concepts to education and applications. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. The full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced. There are, in addition, four key features of this Journal: ● We are introducing a new concept in scientific and technical publications “The Translational Case Report in Bioengineering”. It is a descriptive explanatory analysis of a transformative or translational event. Understanding that the goal of bioengineering scholarship is to advance towards a transformative or clinical solution to an identified transformative/clinical need, the translational case report is used to explore causation in order to find underlying principles that may guide other similar transformative/translational undertakings. ● Manuscripts regarding research proposals and research ideas will be particularly welcomed. ● Electronic files and software regarding the full details of the calculation and experimental procedure, if unable to be published in a normal way, can be deposited as supplementary material. ● We also accept manuscripts communicating to a broader audience with regard to research projects financed with public funds. Scope ● Bionics and biological cybernetics: implantology; bio–abio interfaces ● Bioelectronics: wearable electronics; implantable electronics; “more than Moore” electronics; bioelectronics devices ● Bioprocess and biosystems engineering and applications: bioprocess design; biocatalysis; bioseparation and bioreactors; bioinformatics; bioenergy; etc. ● Biomolecular, cellular and tissue engineering and applications: tissue engineering; chromosome engineering; embryo engineering; cellular, molecular and synthetic biology; metabolic engineering; bio-nanotechnology; micro/nano technologies; genetic engineering; transgenic technology ● Biomedical engineering and applications: biomechatronics; biomedical electronics; biomechanics; biomaterials; biomimetics; biomedical diagnostics; biomedical therapy; biomedical devices; sensors and circuits; biomedical imaging and medical information systems; implants and regenerative medicine; neurotechnology; clinical engineering; rehabilitation engineering ● Biochemical engineering and applications: metabolic pathway engineering; modeling and simulation ● Translational bioengineering
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信