{"title":"Inpatient Postoperative Mortality: Comparing Patients Hospitalized Preoperatively to Those Having Elective Surgery.","authors":"Richard H Epstein, Franklin Dexter, Brenda G Fahy","doi":"10.1097/ALN.0000000000005477","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Perioperative death globally has been described as the third leading cause of death behind heart disease and malignant neoplasm and ahead of cerebrovascular disease. However, studies of all-cause perioperative mortality have not distinguished patients who were outpatients preoperatively (\"elective\") from patients having urgent surgery or having surgery on a day after their date of admission (\"nonelective\"). Strategies for reducing overall perioperative mortality are affected by whether most deaths occur after elective or nonelective surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The authors studied all adult patients undergoing major diagnostic or therapeutic surgery in Florida in 2021 and 2022 hospitalized 2 or more midnights. They compared those who survived to discharge or died between the elective and nonelective groups. Major hospital-acquired complications were considered as sensitivity analyses. The diversity of procedures (International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision-Procedure Coding System [ICD-10-PCS] codes) was quantified using the inverse of the internal Herfindahl.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 1,245,537 hospitalizations studied, the nonelective group accounted for 94.5% (95% CI, 94.0 to 95.1%) of the 20,874 in-hospital deaths ( P < 0.0001 vs. 50% [\"most\"]). The nonelective group also accounted for most (70.0%) hospitalizations studied. The relative risk of death in the elective versus nonelective group was 0.13 (95% CI, 0.12 to 0.14; P < 0.0001 vs . 1.0). The relative risks of acute kidney injury, hospital-acquired pneumonia, a major adverse cardiovascular event, and infection were all less than 1.0 in the elective group. Hundreds of different ICD-10-PCS codes occurred commonly among patients who died, in both groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Results of previous studies of all-cause perioperative mortality should not be applied to patients having elective major surgery because most deaths (approximately 95%) and most cases (70%) are in patients having nonelective major surgery ( i.e. , already admitted to the hospital or undergoing trauma-related surgery). From a public health perspective, interventions to reduce postoperative mortality should be primarily focused on patients who are inpatients before their first major surgical procedure.</p>","PeriodicalId":7970,"journal":{"name":"Anesthesiology","volume":" ","pages":"62-70"},"PeriodicalIF":9.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ALN.0000000000005477","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Perioperative death globally has been described as the third leading cause of death behind heart disease and malignant neoplasm and ahead of cerebrovascular disease. However, studies of all-cause perioperative mortality have not distinguished patients who were outpatients preoperatively ("elective") from patients having urgent surgery or having surgery on a day after their date of admission ("nonelective"). Strategies for reducing overall perioperative mortality are affected by whether most deaths occur after elective or nonelective surgery.
Methods: The authors studied all adult patients undergoing major diagnostic or therapeutic surgery in Florida in 2021 and 2022 hospitalized 2 or more midnights. They compared those who survived to discharge or died between the elective and nonelective groups. Major hospital-acquired complications were considered as sensitivity analyses. The diversity of procedures (International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision-Procedure Coding System [ICD-10-PCS] codes) was quantified using the inverse of the internal Herfindahl.
Results: Among the 1,245,537 hospitalizations studied, the nonelective group accounted for 94.5% (95% CI, 94.0 to 95.1%) of the 20,874 in-hospital deaths ( P < 0.0001 vs. 50% ["most"]). The nonelective group also accounted for most (70.0%) hospitalizations studied. The relative risk of death in the elective versus nonelective group was 0.13 (95% CI, 0.12 to 0.14; P < 0.0001 vs . 1.0). The relative risks of acute kidney injury, hospital-acquired pneumonia, a major adverse cardiovascular event, and infection were all less than 1.0 in the elective group. Hundreds of different ICD-10-PCS codes occurred commonly among patients who died, in both groups.
Conclusions: Results of previous studies of all-cause perioperative mortality should not be applied to patients having elective major surgery because most deaths (approximately 95%) and most cases (70%) are in patients having nonelective major surgery ( i.e. , already admitted to the hospital or undergoing trauma-related surgery). From a public health perspective, interventions to reduce postoperative mortality should be primarily focused on patients who are inpatients before their first major surgical procedure.
背景:全球围手术期死亡已被描述为仅次于心脏病和恶性肿瘤的第三大死亡原因,领先于脑血管疾病。然而,全因围手术期死亡率的研究并没有将术前门诊患者(“选择性”)与紧急手术患者或入院后一天手术患者(“非选择性”)区分开来。降低围手术期总死亡率的策略取决于大多数死亡是发生在择期手术还是非择期手术之后。方法:我们研究了2021年和2022年在佛罗里达州接受重大诊断或治疗性手术的所有住院≥2个午夜的成年患者。我们比较了选择组和非选择组之间存活到出院或死亡的患者。主要的医院获得性并发症被视为敏感性分析。程序的多样性(ICD-10-PCS代码)使用内部Herfindahl逆进行量化。结果:在研究的1,245,537例住院中,非选择性组占20,874例院内死亡的94.5% (95% CI 94.0-95.1%) (p < 0.0001 vs 50%[“大多数”])。非选择性组也占研究中住院人数最多(70.0%)。择期组与非择期组的相对死亡风险为0.13 (95% CI 0.12-0.14, p < 0.0001 vs. 1.0)。结论:以往关于全因围手术期死亡率的研究结果不适用于择期大手术患者,因为大多数死亡(≈95%)和大多数病例(70%)发生在非择期大手术患者中(即已经住院或正在进行创伤相关手术)。从公共卫生的角度来看,降低术后死亡率的干预措施应主要集中在首次大手术前的住院患者身上。
期刊介绍:
With its establishment in 1940, Anesthesiology has emerged as a prominent leader in the field of anesthesiology, encompassing perioperative, critical care, and pain medicine. As the esteemed journal of the American Society of Anesthesiologists, Anesthesiology operates independently with full editorial freedom. Its distinguished Editorial Board, comprising renowned professionals from across the globe, drives the advancement of the specialty by presenting innovative research through immediate open access to select articles and granting free access to all published articles after a six-month period. Furthermore, Anesthesiology actively promotes groundbreaking studies through an influential press release program. The journal's unwavering commitment lies in the dissemination of exemplary work that enhances clinical practice and revolutionizes the practice of medicine within our discipline.