Beyond Survival: Harnessing Sustainability Frameworks to Assess and Support Programs Implementing Bundled Interventions for Black Women With HIV.

IF 9.6 1区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Angela Wangari Walter, Melanie Rocco, Judith C Scott, Ashley Carhee, Vanessa Ayafor, Rahab Goodwin, Shakeila A Lewis-Chery, Alicia Downes, LaShonda Y Spencer, Linda Sprague Martinez
{"title":"Beyond Survival: Harnessing Sustainability Frameworks to Assess and Support Programs Implementing Bundled Interventions for Black Women With HIV.","authors":"Angela Wangari Walter, Melanie Rocco, Judith C Scott, Ashley Carhee, Vanessa Ayafor, Rahab Goodwin, Shakeila A Lewis-Chery, Alicia Downes, LaShonda Y Spencer, Linda Sprague Martinez","doi":"10.2105/AJPH.2024.307790","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objectives.</b> To evaluate the sustainability of bundled interventions aimed at expanding the delivery and utilization of HIV care and treatment services, tackling socio cultural health determinants, and improving health outcomes for Black women with HIV. <b>Methods.</b> We used quantitative data from the Program Sustainability Assessment Tool (PSAT) to examine sustainability capacity across sites in the United States. Qualitative data from monthly call forms completed by site staff (n = 199), annual site visit reports (n = 24), and one-on-one key informant interviews (n = 76) informed organizational and contextual factors influencing sustainability capacity. <b>Results.</b> A total of 59 stakeholders completed the PSAT. The initiative's overall sustainability score was high (mean = 5.1; range = 3.8-6.6), with sites reporting favorably on program adaptation (mean = 5.8; range = 4.4-6.8), program evaluation (mean = 5.6; range = 3.9-7.0), and organizational capacity (mean = 5.6; range = 3.8-7.0) domains. Adaptability and responsiveness to client needs and sociopolitical contexts were determined valuable; establishing an evaluation infrastructure, capacity to integrate Black Women First (BWF) initiative activities within organizational operations, and environmental support facilitated sustainability. <b>Conclusions.</b> Interventions for Black women with HIV can be sustained and should be pursued and embedded consistently in community and health service organizations. (<i>Am J Public Health</i>. 2025;115(S1):S28-S37. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2024.307790).</p>","PeriodicalId":7647,"journal":{"name":"American journal of public health","volume":"115 S1","pages":"S28-S37"},"PeriodicalIF":9.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11947485/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of public health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2024.307790","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives. To evaluate the sustainability of bundled interventions aimed at expanding the delivery and utilization of HIV care and treatment services, tackling socio cultural health determinants, and improving health outcomes for Black women with HIV. Methods. We used quantitative data from the Program Sustainability Assessment Tool (PSAT) to examine sustainability capacity across sites in the United States. Qualitative data from monthly call forms completed by site staff (n = 199), annual site visit reports (n = 24), and one-on-one key informant interviews (n = 76) informed organizational and contextual factors influencing sustainability capacity. Results. A total of 59 stakeholders completed the PSAT. The initiative's overall sustainability score was high (mean = 5.1; range = 3.8-6.6), with sites reporting favorably on program adaptation (mean = 5.8; range = 4.4-6.8), program evaluation (mean = 5.6; range = 3.9-7.0), and organizational capacity (mean = 5.6; range = 3.8-7.0) domains. Adaptability and responsiveness to client needs and sociopolitical contexts were determined valuable; establishing an evaluation infrastructure, capacity to integrate Black Women First (BWF) initiative activities within organizational operations, and environmental support facilitated sustainability. Conclusions. Interventions for Black women with HIV can be sustained and should be pursued and embedded consistently in community and health service organizations. (Am J Public Health. 2025;115(S1):S28-S37. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2024.307790).

超越生存:利用可持续性框架评估和支持为感染艾滋病毒的黑人妇女实施捆绑干预的项目。
目标。评估旨在扩大艾滋病毒护理和治疗服务的提供和利用、解决社会文化健康决定因素和改善感染艾滋病毒的黑人妇女健康结果的捆绑干预措施的可持续性。方法。我们使用来自项目可持续性评估工具(PSAT)的定量数据来检查美国各站点的可持续性能力。从现场工作人员填写的月度电话表格(n = 199)、年度现场访问报告(n = 24)和一对一关键线人访谈(n = 76)中获得的定性数据表明,影响可持续性能力的组织和背景因素。结果。共有59名持份者完成了PSAT。该计划的整体可持续性得分很高(平均= 5.1;范围= 3.8-6.6),各网站在节目改编方面表现良好(平均值= 5.8;范围= 4.4-6.8),项目评估(平均值= 5.6;范围= 3.9-7.0)和组织能力(平均值= 5.6;范围= 3.8-7.0)域。对客户需求和社会政治环境的适应性和响应性被认为是有价值的;建立评价基础设施,将黑人妇女优先(BWF)倡议活动纳入组织业务的能力,以及促进可持续性的环境支持。结论。针对感染艾滋病毒的黑人妇女的干预措施是可以持续的,应该在社区和保健服务组织中持续进行和贯彻。[J] .公共卫生,2025;115(S1):S28-S37。https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2024.307790)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American journal of public health
American journal of public health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
9.50
自引率
3.90%
发文量
1109
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Public Health (AJPH) is dedicated to publishing original work in research, research methods, and program evaluation within the field of public health. The journal's mission is to advance public health research, policy, practice, and education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信