Infectious Sample Transport: Evaluating the Use of Parafilm for Sealing Primary Containers.

IF 0.5 Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Applied Biosafety Pub Date : 2025-03-07 eCollection Date: 2025-03-01 DOI:10.1089/apb.2024.0026
Jay Robinson, Antony Spencer, Simon Parks, Allan M Bennett, Thomas Pottage
{"title":"Infectious Sample Transport: Evaluating the Use of Parafilm for Sealing Primary Containers.","authors":"Jay Robinson, Antony Spencer, Simon Parks, Allan M Bennett, Thomas Pottage","doi":"10.1089/apb.2024.0026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The transport of infectious substances is a highly regulated process. The European Agreement for International Carriage of Dangerous Goods by Road instructs that infectious specimens must be transported in a triple packaging system containing leakproof receptacles. Despite regulatory efforts, leakages occur. Current evidence for Parafilm usage is lacking. This study evaluates the use of Parafilm for preventing leakage from commonly used primary receptacles during ground transport.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Two test methods, manual inversion and a rocker, were used to simulate standard ground transport. Testing was performed with two common receptacles and three differing volumes of test solution. Each test was performed in quintuplicate. Fluorescein solution was used to aid in visual identification of leakage in addition to the weight of the receptacles before and after testing.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Despite lids being correctly applied, 10% of full 30 mL universal tubes leaked as a result of the rocker testing (<i>n</i> = 40). Overall, 92.5% of full 30 mL universals tested with a cross-threaded lid experienced leakage. Two-milliliter Sarstedt tubes did not experience a single leak even while cross-threaded. Clockwise application of Parafilm decreased leakage from receptacles. Wrapping Parafilm over and under the receptacle provided no benefit compared with not using Parafilm.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Clockwise application of Parafilm may decrease leakage in the event of cross-threading. Despite this, receptacles must be opened in the correct containment, as spillage during unwrapping and lid removal is common. Further investigation is required to assess the effects of pressure on modes of transport such as air travel.</p>","PeriodicalId":7962,"journal":{"name":"Applied Biosafety","volume":"30 1","pages":"11-18"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11937801/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Biosafety","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/apb.2024.0026","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The transport of infectious substances is a highly regulated process. The European Agreement for International Carriage of Dangerous Goods by Road instructs that infectious specimens must be transported in a triple packaging system containing leakproof receptacles. Despite regulatory efforts, leakages occur. Current evidence for Parafilm usage is lacking. This study evaluates the use of Parafilm for preventing leakage from commonly used primary receptacles during ground transport.

Methods: Two test methods, manual inversion and a rocker, were used to simulate standard ground transport. Testing was performed with two common receptacles and three differing volumes of test solution. Each test was performed in quintuplicate. Fluorescein solution was used to aid in visual identification of leakage in addition to the weight of the receptacles before and after testing.

Results: Despite lids being correctly applied, 10% of full 30 mL universal tubes leaked as a result of the rocker testing (n = 40). Overall, 92.5% of full 30 mL universals tested with a cross-threaded lid experienced leakage. Two-milliliter Sarstedt tubes did not experience a single leak even while cross-threaded. Clockwise application of Parafilm decreased leakage from receptacles. Wrapping Parafilm over and under the receptacle provided no benefit compared with not using Parafilm.

Conclusion: Clockwise application of Parafilm may decrease leakage in the event of cross-threading. Despite this, receptacles must be opened in the correct containment, as spillage during unwrapping and lid removal is common. Further investigation is required to assess the effects of pressure on modes of transport such as air travel.

感染性样品运输:评价用于密封主容器的副膜的使用。
传染性物质的运输是一个高度管制的过程。《危险货物国际公路运输欧洲协定》规定,传染性标本必须用三层包装系统运输,其中包含防漏容器。尽管监管努力,泄漏还是发生了。目前缺乏关于Parafilm用法的证据。本研究评估了在地面运输过程中使用Parafilm防止常用主容器泄漏的效果。方法:采用手动翻转和摇杆两种测试方法模拟标准地面运输。用两个普通容器和三种不同体积的测试溶液进行测试。每个试验进行了五次重复。荧光素溶液用于辅助视觉识别泄漏以及测试前后容器的重量。结果:尽管盖子被正确应用,10%的满30毫升通用管泄漏作为摇杆测试的结果(n = 40)。总的来说,92.5%的满30毫升通用测试与交叉螺纹盖经历泄漏。2毫升的萨斯泰特管即使在交叉螺纹时也没有发生一次泄漏。顺时针应用副膜减少从容器泄漏。与不使用Parafilm相比,在容器的上方和下方包裹Parafilm没有任何好处。结论:顺时针应用Parafilm可减少交叉穿刺术时的渗漏。尽管如此,容器必须在正确的容器中打开,因为在打开包装和拆除盖子期间溢出是常见的。需要进一步调查以评估压力对诸如航空旅行等运输方式的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Applied Biosafety
Applied Biosafety Environmental Science-Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
13.30%
发文量
27
期刊介绍: Applied Biosafety (APB), sponsored by ABSA International, is a peer-reviewed, scientific journal committed to promoting global biosafety awareness and best practices to prevent occupational exposures and adverse environmental impacts related to biohazardous releases. APB provides a forum for exchanging sound biosafety and biosecurity initiatives by publishing original articles, review articles, letters to the editors, commentaries, and brief reviews. APB informs scientists, safety professionals, policymakers, engineers, architects, and governmental organizations. The journal is committed to publishing on topics significant in well-resourced countries as well as information relevant to underserved regions, engaging and cultivating the development of biosafety professionals globally.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信