Measurement properties of self-reported outcome measures for older adults with nonspecific low back pain: a systematic review.

IF 6 2区 医学 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Frank F Huang, Jitong Liang, Chung-Ying Lin, Dino Samartzis, Jaro Karppinen, Yongping Zheng, Zhixing Zhou, Daniel K Y Zheng, Jeremy R Chang, Katie de Luca, Arnold Y L Wong
{"title":"Measurement properties of self-reported outcome measures for older adults with nonspecific low back pain: a systematic review.","authors":"Frank F Huang, Jitong Liang, Chung-Ying Lin, Dino Samartzis, Jaro Karppinen, Yongping Zheng, Zhixing Zhou, Daniel K Y Zheng, Jeremy R Chang, Katie de Luca, Arnold Y L Wong","doi":"10.1093/ageing/afaf045","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To summarise the measurement properties of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) for older adults with nonspecific low back pain.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eight databases were searched from inception to January 2024. Two independent reviewers conducted article screening, data extraction, risk of bias assessments, evaluations of measurement properties of PROMs, syntheses of quality of evidence and forming recommendation levels using relevant checklists and assessment tools.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ten PROMs were identified from 12 included studies. The Functional Rating Index, Oswestry Disability Index, Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire and Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale demonstrated the highest recommendation (category A: PROM most suitable) for evaluating pain-related functional limitation or pain intensity in older adults with acute, subacute or chronic nonspecific low back pain. The Pain Response to Activity and Positioning questionnaire obtained a category A recommendation for making a differential diagnosis of chronic nonspecific low back pain in older adults. The 36-Item World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 was considered promising (category B: PROM recommended) for assessing physical functioning, while the Back Believe Questionnaire, Catastrophizing Avoidance Scale D-65+, Pain Catastrophizing Scale and Psychological Inflexibility in Pain Scale obtained category B recommendation for evaluating negative thoughts in this population, although further validation is warranted.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This systematic review identified suitable PROMs for assessing physical function in older adults with nonspecific low back pain, but more studies are needed to evaluate the measurement properties of questionnaires on other outcome domains in this population.</p>","PeriodicalId":7682,"journal":{"name":"Age and ageing","volume":"54 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11942786/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Age and ageing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afaf045","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To summarise the measurement properties of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) for older adults with nonspecific low back pain.

Methods: Eight databases were searched from inception to January 2024. Two independent reviewers conducted article screening, data extraction, risk of bias assessments, evaluations of measurement properties of PROMs, syntheses of quality of evidence and forming recommendation levels using relevant checklists and assessment tools.

Results: Ten PROMs were identified from 12 included studies. The Functional Rating Index, Oswestry Disability Index, Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire and Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale demonstrated the highest recommendation (category A: PROM most suitable) for evaluating pain-related functional limitation or pain intensity in older adults with acute, subacute or chronic nonspecific low back pain. The Pain Response to Activity and Positioning questionnaire obtained a category A recommendation for making a differential diagnosis of chronic nonspecific low back pain in older adults. The 36-Item World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 was considered promising (category B: PROM recommended) for assessing physical functioning, while the Back Believe Questionnaire, Catastrophizing Avoidance Scale D-65+, Pain Catastrophizing Scale and Psychological Inflexibility in Pain Scale obtained category B recommendation for evaluating negative thoughts in this population, although further validation is warranted.

Conclusions: This systematic review identified suitable PROMs for assessing physical function in older adults with nonspecific low back pain, but more studies are needed to evaluate the measurement properties of questionnaires on other outcome domains in this population.

非特异性腰痛老年人自我报告结果测量的测量特性:系统回顾。
目的:总结老年人非特异性腰痛患者报告结果测量(PROMs)的测量特性。方法:检索自建库至2024年1月的8个数据库。两名独立审稿人进行了文章筛选、数据提取、偏倚风险评估、PROMs测量特性评估、证据质量综合以及使用相关清单和评估工具形成推荐水平。结果:从12项纳入的研究中鉴定出10个PROMs。功能评分指数、Oswestry失能指数、Roland Morris失能问卷和Quebec腰痛失能量表在评估老年人急性、亚急性或慢性非特异性腰痛的疼痛相关功能限制或疼痛强度时显示出最高推荐值(A类:PROM最适合)。对活动和定位的疼痛反应问卷对老年人慢性非特异性腰痛的鉴别诊断获得了a类推荐。36项世界卫生组织残疾评估表2.0被认为有希望(B类:推荐)评估身体功能,而背部相信问卷,灾难避免量表D-65+,疼痛灾难量表和疼痛量表中的心理不灵活性获得B类推荐,用于评估该人群的消极想法,尽管需要进一步验证。结论:本系统综述确定了适合评估非特异性腰痛老年人身体功能的PROMs,但需要更多的研究来评估问卷在该人群中其他结果域的测量特性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Age and ageing
Age and ageing 医学-老年医学
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
6.00%
发文量
796
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Age and Ageing is an international journal publishing refereed original articles and commissioned reviews on geriatric medicine and gerontology. Its range includes research on ageing and clinical, epidemiological, and psychological aspects of later life.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信