Cumulative radiation dose in children with congenital heart disease: national data 2000-2021, stratified by diagnosis, age, and imaging modality.

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Susmita Afroz, Bjørn H Østerås, Utheya S Thevathas, Lise Heiberg, Trude E Robsahm, Hilde M Olerud, Gaute Dohlen
{"title":"Cumulative radiation dose in children with congenital heart disease: national data 2000-2021, stratified by diagnosis, age, and imaging modality.","authors":"Susmita Afroz, Bjørn H Østerås, Utheya S Thevathas, Lise Heiberg, Trude E Robsahm, Hilde M Olerud, Gaute Dohlen","doi":"10.1177/02841851251327896","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundPediatric congenital heart disease (CHD) patients often undergo procedures involving ionizing radiation for diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up. Their cumulative radiation burden may increase their risk of late effects.PurposeTo assess radiation exposures from cardiac catheterization and thoracic imaging in pediatric CHD patients, stratified by diagnosis, age, and imaging modality.Material and MethodsRadiation exposure (cardiac catheterization, thoracic computed tomography [CT] and radiography) was retrospectively collected for individuals aged <18 years (born 2000-2020) with at least one catheterization for CHD. Cumulative effective dose (CED) was estimated per patient by diagnosis. Age-based variation in examination frequency and exposure was examined.ResultsA total of 1574 patients underwent 23,558 radiographic examinations. The most common diagnoses, atrial septal defect (ASD; 31% of the cohort) and patent ductus arteriosus (PDA; 30%), had a median CED of 2.3 and 2.9 mSv, respectively. The diagnoses resulting in highest CEDs were hypoplastic left heart syndrome (HLHS; 2.6%, 37.5 mSv), double inlet left ventricle (DILV; 2.4%, 48.4 mSv), and double outlet right ventricle (DORV; 2.6%, 31.3 mSv). Cardiac catheterization, thoracic CT, and radiography contributed 94%, 4%, and 2% of CED, respectively. Effective doses per patient for each diagnosis varied with age. Doses from cardiac catheterizations tended to be higher for patients exposed at ≤30 versus 31-90 months old.ConclusionMost patients with ASD and PDA had low CED and patients with HLHS, DILV, and DORV received ≥30 mSv. Patients with severe CHD often required early catheterization, which, in turn, led to higher effective doses in these patients due to larger conversion coefficients between dose area product/dose length product and effective dose in individuals aged ≤30 months.</p>","PeriodicalId":7143,"journal":{"name":"Acta radiologica","volume":" ","pages":"2841851251327896"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta radiologica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02841851251327896","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BackgroundPediatric congenital heart disease (CHD) patients often undergo procedures involving ionizing radiation for diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up. Their cumulative radiation burden may increase their risk of late effects.PurposeTo assess radiation exposures from cardiac catheterization and thoracic imaging in pediatric CHD patients, stratified by diagnosis, age, and imaging modality.Material and MethodsRadiation exposure (cardiac catheterization, thoracic computed tomography [CT] and radiography) was retrospectively collected for individuals aged <18 years (born 2000-2020) with at least one catheterization for CHD. Cumulative effective dose (CED) was estimated per patient by diagnosis. Age-based variation in examination frequency and exposure was examined.ResultsA total of 1574 patients underwent 23,558 radiographic examinations. The most common diagnoses, atrial septal defect (ASD; 31% of the cohort) and patent ductus arteriosus (PDA; 30%), had a median CED of 2.3 and 2.9 mSv, respectively. The diagnoses resulting in highest CEDs were hypoplastic left heart syndrome (HLHS; 2.6%, 37.5 mSv), double inlet left ventricle (DILV; 2.4%, 48.4 mSv), and double outlet right ventricle (DORV; 2.6%, 31.3 mSv). Cardiac catheterization, thoracic CT, and radiography contributed 94%, 4%, and 2% of CED, respectively. Effective doses per patient for each diagnosis varied with age. Doses from cardiac catheterizations tended to be higher for patients exposed at ≤30 versus 31-90 months old.ConclusionMost patients with ASD and PDA had low CED and patients with HLHS, DILV, and DORV received ≥30 mSv. Patients with severe CHD often required early catheterization, which, in turn, led to higher effective doses in these patients due to larger conversion coefficients between dose area product/dose length product and effective dose in individuals aged ≤30 months.

先天性心脏病儿童的累积辐射剂量:2000-2021年国家数据,按诊断、年龄和成像方式分层
背景:儿童先天性心脏病(CHD)患者通常接受电离辐射诊断、治疗和随访。他们的累积辐射负荷可能增加其后期影响的风险。目的:根据诊断、年龄和影像学方式,评估小儿冠心病患者心导管穿刺和胸部影像学的辐射暴露情况。材料与方法回顾性收集老年人的辐射暴露(心导管、胸部CT和x线摄影)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta radiologica
Acta radiologica 医学-核医学
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
170
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Radiologica publishes articles on all aspects of radiology, from clinical radiology to experimental work. It is known for articles based on experimental work and contrast media research, giving priority to scientific original papers. The distinguished international editorial board also invite review articles, short communications and technical and instrumental notes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信