Quantitative evaluation of axillary lymph nodes in breast cancer on dual-phase dual-energy CT by precise match with pathology.

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Tingting Qiao, Su Wang, Zhengyin Shen, Lei Zhang, Guoxuan Wang, Bin Hua, Lei Jiang
{"title":"Quantitative evaluation of axillary lymph nodes in breast cancer on dual-phase dual-energy CT by precise match with pathology.","authors":"Tingting Qiao, Su Wang, Zhengyin Shen, Lei Zhang, Guoxuan Wang, Bin Hua, Lei Jiang","doi":"10.1177/02841851251326469","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundIdentification of axillary lymph node (aLN) metastasis in breast cancer (BC) is important. Dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) is a promising innovation in the field of CT. However, its role in evaluating aLNs remains unclear.PurposeTo investigate the diagnostic performance of DECT in evaluating aLN metastasis in BC patients.Material and MethodsData were prospectively collected from treatment-naïve BC patients who underwent DECT for staging, ultrasound-guided biopsy for suspicious aLNs, and placement of tissue marker in the pathology-positive aLNs. Further cross-sectional imaging was performed preoperatively to locate the marker-labeled LN and help to identify the pathologically proven LN on DECT. Maximal short diameter (MSD) and 13 DECT parameters were measured on metastatic aLNs and contralateral normal aLNs. The univariate, least absolute shrinkage and selection operator and multivariable logistic regression were performed to find independent parameters for predicting metastasis. The diagnostic performance was assessed using receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis.ResultsA total of 76 axillary LNs (38 metastasized, 38 normal) from 38 patients were finally included. All DECT parameters showed significant difference between metastatic and normal LNs (all <i>P</i> < 0.001). Arterial enhancement fraction (AEF) and MSD were independent predictors of metastasis (<i>P</i> = 0.010 and 0.014, respectively). The area under the ROC curve (AUC) of AEF was the highest (0.967). The combined AUC of AEF and MSD was significantly higher than that of MSD alone (0.994 vs. 0.943; <i>P</i> = 0.025).ConclusionDECT is a promising tool for preoperative evaluation of aLNs in BC patients, with MSD and AEF having the best diagnostic performance.</p>","PeriodicalId":7143,"journal":{"name":"Acta radiologica","volume":" ","pages":"2841851251326469"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta radiologica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02841851251326469","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BackgroundIdentification of axillary lymph node (aLN) metastasis in breast cancer (BC) is important. Dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) is a promising innovation in the field of CT. However, its role in evaluating aLNs remains unclear.PurposeTo investigate the diagnostic performance of DECT in evaluating aLN metastasis in BC patients.Material and MethodsData were prospectively collected from treatment-naïve BC patients who underwent DECT for staging, ultrasound-guided biopsy for suspicious aLNs, and placement of tissue marker in the pathology-positive aLNs. Further cross-sectional imaging was performed preoperatively to locate the marker-labeled LN and help to identify the pathologically proven LN on DECT. Maximal short diameter (MSD) and 13 DECT parameters were measured on metastatic aLNs and contralateral normal aLNs. The univariate, least absolute shrinkage and selection operator and multivariable logistic regression were performed to find independent parameters for predicting metastasis. The diagnostic performance was assessed using receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis.ResultsA total of 76 axillary LNs (38 metastasized, 38 normal) from 38 patients were finally included. All DECT parameters showed significant difference between metastatic and normal LNs (all P < 0.001). Arterial enhancement fraction (AEF) and MSD were independent predictors of metastasis (P = 0.010 and 0.014, respectively). The area under the ROC curve (AUC) of AEF was the highest (0.967). The combined AUC of AEF and MSD was significantly higher than that of MSD alone (0.994 vs. 0.943; P = 0.025).ConclusionDECT is a promising tool for preoperative evaluation of aLNs in BC patients, with MSD and AEF having the best diagnostic performance.

双期双能CT与病理精确匹配定量评价乳腺癌腋窝淋巴结。
背景乳腺癌(BC)腋窝淋巴结(aLN)转移的鉴别非常重要。双能计算机断层扫描(DECT)是CT领域的一项有前途的创新。然而,它在评估人工神经网络中的作用尚不清楚。目的探讨DECT对BC患者aLN转移的诊断价值。材料和方法前瞻性收集treatment-naïve BC患者的数据,这些患者接受DECT进行分期,超声引导下可疑aln的活检,并在病理阳性aln中放置组织标志物。术前进行进一步的横断面成像以定位标记物标记的LN,并帮助识别经病理证实的DECT LN。对转移性aLNs和对侧正常aLNs进行了最大短径(MSD)和13项DECT参数的测量。采用单变量、最小绝对收缩、选择算子和多变量logistic回归寻找预测转移的独立参数。采用受试者工作特征(ROC)分析评估诊断效果。结果38例患者共76例腋窝淋巴结转移灶(38例转移灶,38例正常灶)。所有DECT参数在转移性LNs和正常LNs之间均有显著差异(P值分别为0.010和0.014)。AEF的ROC曲线下面积(AUC)最高,为0.967。AEF和MSD的联合AUC显著高于MSD (0.994 vs 0.943;p = 0.025)。结论dect是一种很有前景的用于BC患者aln术前评估的工具,其中MSD和AEF的诊断效果最好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta radiologica
Acta radiologica 医学-核医学
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
170
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Radiologica publishes articles on all aspects of radiology, from clinical radiology to experimental work. It is known for articles based on experimental work and contrast media research, giving priority to scientific original papers. The distinguished international editorial board also invite review articles, short communications and technical and instrumental notes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信