Biljana Milanović-Dobrota, Sara Jelić, Nataša Buha, Mirjana Japundža-Milisavljević
{"title":"Employer Perspectives on Hiring Individuals With Intellectual Disabilities: A Case Study From Serbia†","authors":"Biljana Milanović-Dobrota, Sara Jelić, Nataša Buha, Mirjana Japundža-Milisavljević","doi":"10.1111/jar.70045","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Individuals with intellectual disabilities have the lowest employment rates amongst all disability types, despite available job opportunities. Employer bias is a significant barrier to their workforce participation. This research examines employers' opinions towards hiring individuals with intellectual disabilities in Serbia.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Method</h3>\n \n <p>The sample included 358 employers. General attitudes and opinions on hiring individuals with intellectual disabilities were assessed using the Community Living Attitudes Scale and the Work for People with Disability Scale.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Employers' perspectives towards hiring individuals with intellectual disabilities are ambiguous. However, those with positive contact experiences view their employment more favourably, particularly regarding social acceptance in the workplace compared to work performance.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>The findings indicate that employers in Serbia are not yet prepared to provide equal opportunities to individuals with intellectual disabilities. Increased engagement from relevant institutions is essential to develop new intervention programmes that enhance employment outcomes.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":51403,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities","volume":"38 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jar.70045","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Individuals with intellectual disabilities have the lowest employment rates amongst all disability types, despite available job opportunities. Employer bias is a significant barrier to their workforce participation. This research examines employers' opinions towards hiring individuals with intellectual disabilities in Serbia.
Method
The sample included 358 employers. General attitudes and opinions on hiring individuals with intellectual disabilities were assessed using the Community Living Attitudes Scale and the Work for People with Disability Scale.
Results
Employers' perspectives towards hiring individuals with intellectual disabilities are ambiguous. However, those with positive contact experiences view their employment more favourably, particularly regarding social acceptance in the workplace compared to work performance.
Conclusions
The findings indicate that employers in Serbia are not yet prepared to provide equal opportunities to individuals with intellectual disabilities. Increased engagement from relevant institutions is essential to develop new intervention programmes that enhance employment outcomes.
期刊介绍:
JARID is an international, peer-reviewed journal which draws together findings derived from original applied research in intellectual disabilities. The journal is an important forum for the dissemination of ideas to promote valued lifestyles for people with intellectual disabilities. It reports on research from the UK and overseas by authors from all relevant professional disciplines. It is aimed at an international, multi-disciplinary readership. Topics covered include community living, quality of life, challenging behaviour, communication, sexuality, medication, ageing, supported employment, family issues, mental health, physical health, autism, economic issues, social networks, staff stress, staff training, epidemiology and service provision.