A look at caregivers for community-living persons with dementia: Implications for the GUIDE model

IF 13 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Julia G. Burgdorf, Vicki A. Freedman, Jennifer L. Wolff
{"title":"A look at caregivers for community-living persons with dementia: Implications for the GUIDE model","authors":"Julia G. Burgdorf,&nbsp;Vicki A. Freedman,&nbsp;Jennifer L. Wolff","doi":"10.1002/alz.70013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> INTRODUCTION</h3>\n \n <p>Medicare's new Guiding an Improved Dementia Experience (GUIDE) model funds integrated dementia care and related caregiver supports for community-living persons with dementia (PwD). Caregiver strain is a factor in provider payment and performance.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> METHODS</h3>\n \n <p>We examined national survey data on community-living PwD and their caregivers to identify which caregivers would receive support under GUIDE and characterize caregiver strain and use of supportive services.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> RESULTS</h3>\n \n <p>Half of GUIDE-eligible PwD received care from multiple caregivers and high strain was common even among caregivers considered “low-complexity” under GUIDE. Use of role-related training, respite care, and support groups were low (11%, 18%, and 4%, respectively) and did not vary with caregiver strain.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> DISCUSSION</h3>\n \n <p>Caregiver identification and assessment standards under GUIDE may overlook a significant number of caregivers. To maximize impact, innovative models like GUIDE should align caregiver engagement and services with the unique realities of care networks for PwD.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Highlights</h3>\n \n <div>\n <ul>\n \n <li>Half of GUIDE-eligible persons with dementia have multiple caregivers.</li>\n \n <li>32% of caregivers for community-living PwD report high strain.</li>\n \n <li>11% of caregivers for community-living PwD received training and 18% used respite care.</li>\n </ul>\n </div>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":7471,"journal":{"name":"Alzheimer's & Dementia","volume":"21 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":13.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/alz.70013","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alzheimer's & Dementia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/alz.70013","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Medicare's new Guiding an Improved Dementia Experience (GUIDE) model funds integrated dementia care and related caregiver supports for community-living persons with dementia (PwD). Caregiver strain is a factor in provider payment and performance.

METHODS

We examined national survey data on community-living PwD and their caregivers to identify which caregivers would receive support under GUIDE and characterize caregiver strain and use of supportive services.

RESULTS

Half of GUIDE-eligible PwD received care from multiple caregivers and high strain was common even among caregivers considered “low-complexity” under GUIDE. Use of role-related training, respite care, and support groups were low (11%, 18%, and 4%, respectively) and did not vary with caregiver strain.

DISCUSSION

Caregiver identification and assessment standards under GUIDE may overlook a significant number of caregivers. To maximize impact, innovative models like GUIDE should align caregiver engagement and services with the unique realities of care networks for PwD.

Highlights

  • Half of GUIDE-eligible persons with dementia have multiple caregivers.
  • 32% of caregivers for community-living PwD report high strain.
  • 11% of caregivers for community-living PwD received training and 18% used respite care.

Abstract Image

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Alzheimer's & Dementia
Alzheimer's & Dementia 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
14.50
自引率
5.00%
发文量
299
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Alzheimer's & Dementia is a peer-reviewed journal that aims to bridge knowledge gaps in dementia research by covering the entire spectrum, from basic science to clinical trials to social and behavioral investigations. It provides a platform for rapid communication of new findings and ideas, optimal translation of research into practical applications, increasing knowledge across diverse disciplines for early detection, diagnosis, and intervention, and identifying promising new research directions. In July 2008, Alzheimer's & Dementia was accepted for indexing by MEDLINE, recognizing its scientific merit and contribution to Alzheimer's research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信