Synergistic Effect of Implant Surface Physicochemical Modifications and Macrogeometry on the Early Stages of Osseointegration: An In Vivo Preclinical Study

IF 3.2 4区 医学 Q2 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Ernesto B. Benalcázar-Jalkh, Vasudev Vivekanand Nayak, Blaire V. Slavin, Isis Fatima Balderrama, Estevam A. Bonfante, Paulo G. Coelho, Lukasz Witek
{"title":"Synergistic Effect of Implant Surface Physicochemical Modifications and Macrogeometry on the Early Stages of Osseointegration: An In Vivo Preclinical Study","authors":"Ernesto B. Benalcázar-Jalkh,&nbsp;Vasudev Vivekanand Nayak,&nbsp;Blaire V. Slavin,&nbsp;Isis Fatima Balderrama,&nbsp;Estevam A. Bonfante,&nbsp;Paulo G. Coelho,&nbsp;Lukasz Witek","doi":"10.1002/jbm.b.35569","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This preclinical, in vivo study aimed to histologically and histomorphometrically evaluate the effect of implant design features on bone healing during the early stages of osseointegration. Three different implant macrogeometries and surface treatments were evaluated: (1) trapezoidal threads with decompressing vertical chambers and blasted acid-etched surface (Maestro/Blasted+AE); (2) large thread pitch implant with deep and wide threads, with TiUnite surface (RS/TiUnite); and (3) progressive buttress threads with SLActive surface (BL/SLActive). Implant surfaces were characterized by scanning electron microscopy, profilometry, and energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy. Implants were placed in the iliac bone of 12 female sheep (~65 kg and 2 years old). Following healing times of 3- and 6- weeks, samples were harvested and subjected to qualitative and quantitative histological/histomorphometric evaluations. Percentages of bone-to-implant contact (%BIC) along the implant's perimeter and bone area fraction occupancy (%BAFO) within implant threads were measured, and results were analyzed using a linear mixed model analysis. All implants, irrespective of differences in macrogeometry and surface treatment, at both healing times demonstrated successful osseointegration. Evaluations of %BIC yielded no statistically significant differences among groups at 3 and 6 weeks (<i>p</i> &gt; 0.052). While no significant differences were detected among groups for %BAFO at 3 weeks (<i>p</i> &gt; 0.249), Maestro/Blasted+AE yielded significantly higher degrees of bone formation within implant threads relative to RS/TiUnite (<i>p</i> = 0.043) and BL/SLActive group (<i>p</i> = 0.032) at the 6-week time point. Qualitative histological analyses depicted different osseointegration features for the different implants. While Maestro/Blasted+AE portrayed evidence of an intramembranous-like osseointegration pathway in the healing chambers and interfacial remodeling at thread tips, BL/SLActive and RS/TiUnite groups predominantly presented an interfacial bone remodeling healing pathway. Implant design features influenced the osseointegration pathway, where implants with decompressing vertical chambers enhanced bone formation between implant threads.</p>","PeriodicalId":15269,"journal":{"name":"Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials","volume":"113 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jbm.b.35569","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jbm.b.35569","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This preclinical, in vivo study aimed to histologically and histomorphometrically evaluate the effect of implant design features on bone healing during the early stages of osseointegration. Three different implant macrogeometries and surface treatments were evaluated: (1) trapezoidal threads with decompressing vertical chambers and blasted acid-etched surface (Maestro/Blasted+AE); (2) large thread pitch implant with deep and wide threads, with TiUnite surface (RS/TiUnite); and (3) progressive buttress threads with SLActive surface (BL/SLActive). Implant surfaces were characterized by scanning electron microscopy, profilometry, and energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy. Implants were placed in the iliac bone of 12 female sheep (~65 kg and 2 years old). Following healing times of 3- and 6- weeks, samples were harvested and subjected to qualitative and quantitative histological/histomorphometric evaluations. Percentages of bone-to-implant contact (%BIC) along the implant's perimeter and bone area fraction occupancy (%BAFO) within implant threads were measured, and results were analyzed using a linear mixed model analysis. All implants, irrespective of differences in macrogeometry and surface treatment, at both healing times demonstrated successful osseointegration. Evaluations of %BIC yielded no statistically significant differences among groups at 3 and 6 weeks (p > 0.052). While no significant differences were detected among groups for %BAFO at 3 weeks (p > 0.249), Maestro/Blasted+AE yielded significantly higher degrees of bone formation within implant threads relative to RS/TiUnite (p = 0.043) and BL/SLActive group (p = 0.032) at the 6-week time point. Qualitative histological analyses depicted different osseointegration features for the different implants. While Maestro/Blasted+AE portrayed evidence of an intramembranous-like osseointegration pathway in the healing chambers and interfacial remodeling at thread tips, BL/SLActive and RS/TiUnite groups predominantly presented an interfacial bone remodeling healing pathway. Implant design features influenced the osseointegration pathway, where implants with decompressing vertical chambers enhanced bone formation between implant threads.

Abstract Image

种植体表面物理化学修饰和宏观几何结构对早期骨整合的协同作用:一项体内临床前研究
这项临床前体内研究旨在组织学和组织形态学上评估种植体设计特征对骨融合早期骨愈合的影响。评估了三种不同种植体宏观几何形状和表面处理方法:(1)带减压垂直腔和喷酸蚀表面的梯形螺纹(Maestro/ blast +AE);(2)大螺距种植体,螺纹深、螺纹宽,表面为TiUnite (RS/TiUnite);(3) SLActive表面的渐进式支撑螺纹(BL/SLActive)。通过扫描电子显微镜、轮廓术和能量色散x射线光谱学对植入物表面进行了表征。植入物放置在12只母羊(~65 kg, 2岁)的髂骨内。在3周和6周的愈合时间后,收集样本并进行定性和定量的组织学/组织形态学评估。测量沿种植体周长的骨与种植体接触百分比(%BIC)和种植体螺纹内的骨面积占用百分比(%BAFO),并使用线性混合模型分析结果。所有种植体,不论其宏观几何形状和表面处理的差异,在两种愈合时间均表现出成功的骨整合。在第3周和第6周时,两组间的%BIC评分差异无统计学意义(p > 0.052)。虽然3周时各组间%BAFO无显著差异(p > 0.249),但6周时,Maestro/ blast +AE组种植体螺纹内骨形成程度明显高于RS/TiUnite组(p = 0.043)和BL/SLActive组(p = 0.032)。定性组织学分析描述了不同种植体的不同骨整合特征。虽然Maestro/ blast +AE描述了愈合室中膜内样骨整合途径和螺纹尖端界面重塑的证据,但BL/SLActive和RS/TiUnite组主要显示了界面骨重塑愈合途径。种植体的设计特点影响了骨整合途径,其中具有减压垂直腔的种植体增强了种植体螺纹之间的骨形成。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
2.90%
发文量
199
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Biomedical Materials Research – Part B: Applied Biomaterials is a highly interdisciplinary peer-reviewed journal serving the needs of biomaterials professionals who design, develop, produce and apply biomaterials and medical devices. It has the common focus of biomaterials applied to the human body and covers all disciplines where medical devices are used. Papers are published on biomaterials related to medical device development and manufacture, degradation in the body, nano- and biomimetic- biomaterials interactions, mechanics of biomaterials, implant retrieval and analysis, tissue-biomaterial surface interactions, wound healing, infection, drug delivery, standards and regulation of devices, animal and pre-clinical studies of biomaterials and medical devices, and tissue-biopolymer-material combination products. Manuscripts are published in one of six formats: • original research reports • short research and development reports • scientific reviews • current concepts articles • special reports • editorials Journal of Biomedical Materials Research – Part B: Applied Biomaterials is an official journal of the Society for Biomaterials, Japanese Society for Biomaterials, the Australasian Society for Biomaterials, and the Korean Society for Biomaterials. Manuscripts from all countries are invited but must be in English. Authors are not required to be members of the affiliated Societies, but members of these societies are encouraged to submit their work to the journal for consideration.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信