Latent Profiles of Early Maladaptive Schemas and Their Associations With Suicide Risk Factors in Patients With Mood Disorders

IF 3.2 3区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Chanhee Park, C. Hyung Keun Park
{"title":"Latent Profiles of Early Maladaptive Schemas and Their Associations With Suicide Risk Factors in Patients With Mood Disorders","authors":"Chanhee Park,&nbsp;C. Hyung Keun Park","doi":"10.1002/cpp.70069","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Purpose</h3>\n \n <p>Although early maladaptive schemas (EMSs) have been linked to suicidal ideation, their heterogeneous nature has not been fully explored in this relationship. This study sought to identify distinct latent profiles based on 18 EMSs in a clinical sample and examine how these profiles differ in relation to suicidal ideation and suicide risk factors, such as perceived burdensomeness, thwarted belongingness and fearlessness about death.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Method</h3>\n \n <p>Data from routine clinical assessments of 799 outpatients with mood disorders (aged 18–49 years, 513 female, 286 male, <i>M</i><sub><i>age</i></sub> = 28.71) were analysed. Latent profile analysis was performed to identify distinct EMS profiles, and their associations with suicide risk factors were examined using the Bolck–Croon–Hagenaars method.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Five distinct EMS profiles emerged: <i>Low</i>, <i>Below Average</i>, <i>Above Average</i>, <i>Specific Elevation</i> and <i>High Risk</i>. The <i>Specific Elevation</i> profile demonstrated specifically elevated levels of social isolation/alienation, defectiveness/shame, failure, dependence/incompetence and insufficient self-control/self-discipline, while the levels of most other schemas were similar to the <i>Above Average</i> profile. The <i>High Risk</i> profile showed elevated levels across all schemas. Both the <i>Specific Elevation</i> profile and the <i>High Risk</i> profile exhibited the highest levels of perceived burdensomeness, thwarted belongingness and suicidal ideation, with no significant differences between them. Fearlessness about death did not differ among the profiles.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>The identified EMS profiles offer unique utility in predicting perceived burdensomeness, thwarted belongingness and suicidal ideation. The specific schemas that showed elevation in the <i>Specific Elevation</i> profile may serve as promising targets for mitigating suicide risk in patients with mood disorders.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":10460,"journal":{"name":"Clinical psychology & psychotherapy","volume":"32 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cpp.70069","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical psychology & psychotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cpp.70069","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

Although early maladaptive schemas (EMSs) have been linked to suicidal ideation, their heterogeneous nature has not been fully explored in this relationship. This study sought to identify distinct latent profiles based on 18 EMSs in a clinical sample and examine how these profiles differ in relation to suicidal ideation and suicide risk factors, such as perceived burdensomeness, thwarted belongingness and fearlessness about death.

Method

Data from routine clinical assessments of 799 outpatients with mood disorders (aged 18–49 years, 513 female, 286 male, Mage = 28.71) were analysed. Latent profile analysis was performed to identify distinct EMS profiles, and their associations with suicide risk factors were examined using the Bolck–Croon–Hagenaars method.

Results

Five distinct EMS profiles emerged: Low, Below Average, Above Average, Specific Elevation and High Risk. The Specific Elevation profile demonstrated specifically elevated levels of social isolation/alienation, defectiveness/shame, failure, dependence/incompetence and insufficient self-control/self-discipline, while the levels of most other schemas were similar to the Above Average profile. The High Risk profile showed elevated levels across all schemas. Both the Specific Elevation profile and the High Risk profile exhibited the highest levels of perceived burdensomeness, thwarted belongingness and suicidal ideation, with no significant differences between them. Fearlessness about death did not differ among the profiles.

Conclusion

The identified EMS profiles offer unique utility in predicting perceived burdensomeness, thwarted belongingness and suicidal ideation. The specific schemas that showed elevation in the Specific Elevation profile may serve as promising targets for mitigating suicide risk in patients with mood disorders.

Abstract Image

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical psychology & psychotherapy
Clinical psychology & psychotherapy PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
5.60%
发文量
106
期刊介绍: Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy aims to keep clinical psychologists and psychotherapists up to date with new developments in their fields. The Journal will provide an integrative impetus both between theory and practice and between different orientations within clinical psychology and psychotherapy. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy will be a forum in which practitioners can present their wealth of expertise and innovations in order to make these available to a wider audience. Equally, the Journal will contain reports from researchers who want to address a larger clinical audience with clinically relevant issues and clinically valid research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信