Chemometric-assisted UV spectrophotometric methods for determination of miconazole nitrate and lidocaine hydrochloride along with potential impurity and dosage from preservatives

IF 4.3 2区 化学 Q2 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Esraa S. Ashour, Ghada M. El-Sayed, Maha A. Hegazy, Nermine S. Ghoniem
{"title":"Chemometric-assisted UV spectrophotometric methods for determination of miconazole nitrate and lidocaine hydrochloride along with potential impurity and dosage from preservatives","authors":"Esraa S. Ashour,&nbsp;Ghada M. El-Sayed,&nbsp;Maha A. Hegazy,&nbsp;Nermine S. Ghoniem","doi":"10.1186/s13065-025-01447-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Three accurate, simple, and precise chemometric techniques, principal component regression (PCR), partial least squares (PLS), and backward interval partial least squares (biPLS) were used to resolve the severely overlapped UV spectra of miconazole nitrate (MIC) and Lidocaine hydrochloride (LDC) along with the toxic impurity of LDC; dimethyl aniline (DMA) and the two inactive ingredients; methyl paraben (MTP) and saccharin sodium (SAC). The concentration ranges of the developed models were found to be (2.40–12.00 µg/mL) for LDC and MIC, (1.50–7.50 µg/mL) for DMA and MTP, and (2.00–6.00 µg/mL) for SAC. The proposed methods were found to be green, rapid, and were effectively used to analyze the studied compounds in both laboratory-prepared mixtures and antifungal oral gel, where no impurity was detected. The obtained results revealed that PLS algorithm was superior to PCR depending on the lowest root mean square error of prediction (RMSEP) and correlation coefficient values (r). The biPLS model, constructed with [3, 4, 5, 6, 8, and 9] subintervals, is considered the most efficient model with the lowest number of latent variables. biPLS is ideal for data analysis and enhancing model performance and robustness by focusing on the most relevant spectral regions. When compared to a reported HPLC method, the proposed methods showed non-significant difference regarding accuracy and precision. The developed models often yield faster results than HPLC. Once the model is built, it takes no time to predict multiple samples without requiring reconstruction, in addition, the proposed models minimize the costs of solvents and equipment compared to HPLC, making them a valuable option for quality control laboratories.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":496,"journal":{"name":"BMC Chemistry","volume":"19 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://bmcchem.biomedcentral.com/counter/pdf/10.1186/s13065-025-01447-9","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13065-025-01447-9","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Three accurate, simple, and precise chemometric techniques, principal component regression (PCR), partial least squares (PLS), and backward interval partial least squares (biPLS) were used to resolve the severely overlapped UV spectra of miconazole nitrate (MIC) and Lidocaine hydrochloride (LDC) along with the toxic impurity of LDC; dimethyl aniline (DMA) and the two inactive ingredients; methyl paraben (MTP) and saccharin sodium (SAC). The concentration ranges of the developed models were found to be (2.40–12.00 µg/mL) for LDC and MIC, (1.50–7.50 µg/mL) for DMA and MTP, and (2.00–6.00 µg/mL) for SAC. The proposed methods were found to be green, rapid, and were effectively used to analyze the studied compounds in both laboratory-prepared mixtures and antifungal oral gel, where no impurity was detected. The obtained results revealed that PLS algorithm was superior to PCR depending on the lowest root mean square error of prediction (RMSEP) and correlation coefficient values (r). The biPLS model, constructed with [3, 4, 5, 6, 8, and 9] subintervals, is considered the most efficient model with the lowest number of latent variables. biPLS is ideal for data analysis and enhancing model performance and robustness by focusing on the most relevant spectral regions. When compared to a reported HPLC method, the proposed methods showed non-significant difference regarding accuracy and precision. The developed models often yield faster results than HPLC. Once the model is built, it takes no time to predict multiple samples without requiring reconstruction, in addition, the proposed models minimize the costs of solvents and equipment compared to HPLC, making them a valuable option for quality control laboratories.

化学计量辅助紫外分光光度法测定硝酸盐咪康唑和盐酸利多卡因防腐剂中潜在杂质及用量
采用主成分回归(PCR)、偏最小二乘(PLS)和反向区间偏最小二乘(biPLS)三种准确、简便、精确的化学计量技术,分析了硝酸咪康唑(MIC)和盐酸利多卡因(LDC)的紫外光谱严重重叠以及LDC中的有毒杂质;二甲基苯胺(DMA)和两种非活性成分;对羟基苯甲酸甲酯(MTP)和糖精钠(SAC)。所建立的模型LDC和MIC的浓度范围为(2.40 ~ 12.00µg/mL), DMA和MTP的浓度范围为(1.50 ~ 7.50µg/mL), SAC的浓度范围为(2.00 ~ 6.00µg/mL)。该方法绿色、快速、有效地分析了实验室制备的混合物和抗真菌口服凝胶中所研究的化合物,其中没有检测到杂质。所得结果表明,PLS算法在预测的最小均方根误差(RMSEP)和相关系数值(r)上优于PCR。由[3,4,5,6,8和9]个子区间构建的biPLS模型被认为是潜在变量数量最少的最有效模型。biPLS是理想的数据分析和增强模型性能和鲁棒性,专注于最相关的光谱区域。与已有报道的HPLC法相比,所提方法的准确度和精密度差异不显著。所建立的模型通常比HPLC得到更快的结果。一旦建立模型,无需重建即可快速预测多个样品,此外,与HPLC相比,所提出的模型将溶剂和设备的成本降至最低,使其成为质量控制实验室的宝贵选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Chemistry
BMC Chemistry Chemistry-General Chemistry
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
2.20%
发文量
92
审稿时长
27 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Chemistry, formerly known as Chemistry Central Journal, is now part of the BMC series journals family. Chemistry Central Journal has served the chemistry community as a trusted open access resource for more than 10 years – and we are delighted to announce the next step on its journey. In January 2019 the journal has been renamed BMC Chemistry and now strengthens the BMC series footprint in the physical sciences by publishing quality articles and by pushing the boundaries of open chemistry.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信