Debris flows dynamic risk assessment and interpretable Shapley method-based driving mechanisms exploring – A case study of the upper reach of the Min River
Yufeng He , Mingtao Ding , Yu Duan , Hao Zheng , Wen He , Jun Liu
{"title":"Debris flows dynamic risk assessment and interpretable Shapley method-based driving mechanisms exploring – A case study of the upper reach of the Min River","authors":"Yufeng He , Mingtao Ding , Yu Duan , Hao Zheng , Wen He , Jun Liu","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolind.2025.113400","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Debris flow is one of the most devastating natural hazards. Identifying the dynamic changes and driving factors of debris flow risk can enhance hazard mitigation and prevention. It is not clear what factors can mostly lead to debris flow risk change in mountainous areas, particularly some of these areas in the context of intense earthquakes, rapid urbanization, and climate change. To address these questions, an ensemble learning model was constructed to estimate the debris flow risk of the baseline period (2000) and the current period (2020) in the upper reach of the Min River. The study found that the areas with extremely high debris flow risk decreased by 18.57%, while the areas with moderate and high risk levels increased by 8% and 14% respectively. With this trend of overall risk increasing, the population and buildings affected by extremely high debris flow risk have increased by 20% and 30% respectively. Based on the interpretable learning model of SHAP (The Shapley Additive Explanations value), the mechanisms by driven factors that lead to changes in risk were explored. Population, elevation and NDVI are the most influential factors leading to changes in risk. Specifically, the increase in risk in the low elevation area is due to the rapid urbanization caused by the increase of population and GDP. While the risk change in higher elevation areas contributes to the variation of vegetation and precipitation. These findings have implications for debris flow mitigation and contribute to the understanding of the multiple factors that impact debris flow risk.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11459,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Indicators","volume":"173 ","pages":"Article 113400"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Indicators","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X25003309","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Debris flow is one of the most devastating natural hazards. Identifying the dynamic changes and driving factors of debris flow risk can enhance hazard mitigation and prevention. It is not clear what factors can mostly lead to debris flow risk change in mountainous areas, particularly some of these areas in the context of intense earthquakes, rapid urbanization, and climate change. To address these questions, an ensemble learning model was constructed to estimate the debris flow risk of the baseline period (2000) and the current period (2020) in the upper reach of the Min River. The study found that the areas with extremely high debris flow risk decreased by 18.57%, while the areas with moderate and high risk levels increased by 8% and 14% respectively. With this trend of overall risk increasing, the population and buildings affected by extremely high debris flow risk have increased by 20% and 30% respectively. Based on the interpretable learning model of SHAP (The Shapley Additive Explanations value), the mechanisms by driven factors that lead to changes in risk were explored. Population, elevation and NDVI are the most influential factors leading to changes in risk. Specifically, the increase in risk in the low elevation area is due to the rapid urbanization caused by the increase of population and GDP. While the risk change in higher elevation areas contributes to the variation of vegetation and precipitation. These findings have implications for debris flow mitigation and contribute to the understanding of the multiple factors that impact debris flow risk.
期刊介绍:
The ultimate aim of Ecological Indicators is to integrate the monitoring and assessment of ecological and environmental indicators with management practices. The journal provides a forum for the discussion of the applied scientific development and review of traditional indicator approaches as well as for theoretical, modelling and quantitative applications such as index development. Research into the following areas will be published.
• All aspects of ecological and environmental indicators and indices.
• New indicators, and new approaches and methods for indicator development, testing and use.
• Development and modelling of indices, e.g. application of indicator suites across multiple scales and resources.
• Analysis and research of resource, system- and scale-specific indicators.
• Methods for integration of social and other valuation metrics for the production of scientifically rigorous and politically-relevant assessments using indicator-based monitoring and assessment programs.
• How research indicators can be transformed into direct application for management purposes.
• Broader assessment objectives and methods, e.g. biodiversity, biological integrity, and sustainability, through the use of indicators.
• Resource-specific indicators such as landscape, agroecosystems, forests, wetlands, etc.