Predictive Processing in Autism Spectrum Disorder: The Atypical Iterative Prior Updating Account

IF 4 Q2 NEUROSCIENCES
Zhuanghua Shi , Fredrik Allenmark , Laura A. Theisinger , Rasmus L. Pistorius , Stefan Glasauer , Hermann J. Müller , Christine M. Falter-Wagner
{"title":"Predictive Processing in Autism Spectrum Disorder: The Atypical Iterative Prior Updating Account","authors":"Zhuanghua Shi ,&nbsp;Fredrik Allenmark ,&nbsp;Laura A. Theisinger ,&nbsp;Rasmus L. Pistorius ,&nbsp;Stefan Glasauer ,&nbsp;Hermann J. Müller ,&nbsp;Christine M. Falter-Wagner","doi":"10.1016/j.bpsgos.2025.100468","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The nature of predictive-processing differences between individuals with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and typically developing (TD) individuals remains contested. Some studies have reported impaired predictive processing in ASD, while others have suggested intact but atypical learning dynamics.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We investigated duration reproduction tasks under high- and low-volatility settings to examine the updating dynamics of prior beliefs and sensory estimate updating in individuals with ASD (<em>n</em> = 32) and TD counterparts (<em>n</em> = 32). Using a two-state Bayesian model, we analyzed how the participants updated their prior beliefs and perceptual estimates and how these updates affected their behavior over time.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Individuals with ASD integrated prior knowledge similarly to TD control participants for perceptual estimates. However, they relied more heavily on sensory input for iteratively updating their prior beliefs, perceiving events as less interconnected. This heightened reliance on sensory inputs led to the initial underweighting of priors in perceptual estimates, resulting in a weaker central tendency early in sessions. Over time, ASD participants adapted, reaching integration weights comparable to those of TD control participants by the end of the session. These findings suggest that predictive processing in ASD is characterized by distinct updating dynamics, not an inability to form or use prior effectively.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Our study highlights a unique interplay between sensory inputs and prior beliefs in ASD, where greater reliance on sensory inputs during prior updating influences adaptation speed and intertrial dynamics. This process clarifies inconsistencies in the literature and underscores the role of interactive updating in predictive processing differences between individuals with ASD and TD individuals.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72373,"journal":{"name":"Biological psychiatry global open science","volume":"5 3","pages":"Article 100468"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biological psychiatry global open science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667174325000229","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

The nature of predictive-processing differences between individuals with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and typically developing (TD) individuals remains contested. Some studies have reported impaired predictive processing in ASD, while others have suggested intact but atypical learning dynamics.

Methods

We investigated duration reproduction tasks under high- and low-volatility settings to examine the updating dynamics of prior beliefs and sensory estimate updating in individuals with ASD (n = 32) and TD counterparts (n = 32). Using a two-state Bayesian model, we analyzed how the participants updated their prior beliefs and perceptual estimates and how these updates affected their behavior over time.

Results

Individuals with ASD integrated prior knowledge similarly to TD control participants for perceptual estimates. However, they relied more heavily on sensory input for iteratively updating their prior beliefs, perceiving events as less interconnected. This heightened reliance on sensory inputs led to the initial underweighting of priors in perceptual estimates, resulting in a weaker central tendency early in sessions. Over time, ASD participants adapted, reaching integration weights comparable to those of TD control participants by the end of the session. These findings suggest that predictive processing in ASD is characterized by distinct updating dynamics, not an inability to form or use prior effectively.

Conclusions

Our study highlights a unique interplay between sensory inputs and prior beliefs in ASD, where greater reliance on sensory inputs during prior updating influences adaptation speed and intertrial dynamics. This process clarifies inconsistencies in the literature and underscores the role of interactive updating in predictive processing differences between individuals with ASD and TD individuals.
自闭症谱系障碍的预测加工:非典型迭代先验更新解释
自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)和典型发育(TD)个体之间预测加工差异的本质仍然存在争议。一些研究报告了ASD的预测处理受损,而另一些研究则表明完整但非典型的学习动态。方法研究高波动性和低波动性环境下的持续时间复制任务,以研究ASD (n = 32)和TD (n = 32)个体的先验信念和感官估计更新动态。使用双状态贝叶斯模型,我们分析了参与者如何更新他们的先验信念和感知估计,以及这些更新如何随着时间的推移影响他们的行为。结果ASD个体在知觉估计方面整合先验知识的能力与TD对照组相似。然而,他们更多地依赖于感官输入来迭代更新他们先前的信念,认为事件之间的联系较少。这种对感官输入的高度依赖导致了知觉估计中先验的初始权重偏低,从而导致了会话早期较弱的集中趋势。随着时间的推移,ASD参与者适应了,在会议结束时达到了与TD控制参与者相当的整合权重。这些研究结果表明,ASD的预测加工具有明显的更新动态,而不是无法有效地形成或使用先验。结论我们的研究强调了ASD中感觉输入与先验信念之间的独特相互作用,其中在先验更新过程中对感觉输入的依赖程度越大,影响适应速度和试验间动力学。这一过程澄清了文献中的不一致之处,并强调了互动更新在ASD和TD个体之间预测加工差异中的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Biological psychiatry global open science
Biological psychiatry global open science Psychiatry and Mental Health
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
91 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信