Non-invasive brain stimulation reorganises effective connectivity during a working memory task in individuals with Neurofibromatosis Type 1

Q4 Neuroscience
Marta Czime Litwińczuk , Shruti Garg , Stephen R. Williams , Jonathan Green , Caroline Lea-Carnall , Nelson J. Trujillo-Barreto
{"title":"Non-invasive brain stimulation reorganises effective connectivity during a working memory task in individuals with Neurofibromatosis Type 1","authors":"Marta Czime Litwińczuk ,&nbsp;Shruti Garg ,&nbsp;Stephen R. Williams ,&nbsp;Jonathan Green ,&nbsp;Caroline Lea-Carnall ,&nbsp;Nelson J. Trujillo-Barreto","doi":"10.1016/j.ynirp.2025.100258","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>In a previous study, we examined the effect of atDCS on working memory task performance and modulation of the inhibitory neurotransmitter, gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA), in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (dlPFC). The present study investigates whether tDCS modulates effective connectivity during the task, specifically assessing whether tDCS alters interactions between neuronal populations.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Eighteen adolescents with Neurofibromatosis Type 1 (NF1) completed a single-blind sham-controlled cross-over randomised tDCS trial (with the anode at F3 and cathode at Cz). Dynamic causal modelling was used to estimate the effective connectivity between regions that showed working memory effects from the fMRI. Group-level inferences for between sessions (pre- and post-stimulation) and stimulation type (tDCS and sham) effects were carried out using the parametric empirical Bayes approach. A correlation analysis was performed to relate the estimated effective connectivity parameters of left dlPFC pre-tDCS and post-tDCS to the concentration of GABA measured via magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS-GABA). Next, correlation analysis was repeated using all working memory performance and all pre-tDCS and post-tDCS connectivity parameters.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>It was found that tDCS decreased average excitatory connectivity from dlPFC to left superior frontal gyrus and increased average excitatory connectivity to left globus pallidus. Further, reduced average intrinsic (inhibitory) connectivity of left dlPFC was associated with lower MRS-GABA. However, none of the connectivity parameters of dlPFC showed any association with performance on a working memory task.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>These findings suggest that tDCS reorganised connectivity from frontal to fronto-striatal connectivity. As tDCS-related changes were not specific to the effect of working memory, they may have impacted general cognitive control processes. In addition, by reducing MRS-GABA, tDCS might make dlPFC more sensitive and responsive to external stimulation, such as performance of cognitive tasks.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":74277,"journal":{"name":"Neuroimage. Reports","volume":"5 2","pages":"Article 100258"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuroimage. Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666956025000261","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Neuroscience","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

In a previous study, we examined the effect of atDCS on working memory task performance and modulation of the inhibitory neurotransmitter, gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA), in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (dlPFC). The present study investigates whether tDCS modulates effective connectivity during the task, specifically assessing whether tDCS alters interactions between neuronal populations.

Methods

Eighteen adolescents with Neurofibromatosis Type 1 (NF1) completed a single-blind sham-controlled cross-over randomised tDCS trial (with the anode at F3 and cathode at Cz). Dynamic causal modelling was used to estimate the effective connectivity between regions that showed working memory effects from the fMRI. Group-level inferences for between sessions (pre- and post-stimulation) and stimulation type (tDCS and sham) effects were carried out using the parametric empirical Bayes approach. A correlation analysis was performed to relate the estimated effective connectivity parameters of left dlPFC pre-tDCS and post-tDCS to the concentration of GABA measured via magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS-GABA). Next, correlation analysis was repeated using all working memory performance and all pre-tDCS and post-tDCS connectivity parameters.

Results

It was found that tDCS decreased average excitatory connectivity from dlPFC to left superior frontal gyrus and increased average excitatory connectivity to left globus pallidus. Further, reduced average intrinsic (inhibitory) connectivity of left dlPFC was associated with lower MRS-GABA. However, none of the connectivity parameters of dlPFC showed any association with performance on a working memory task.

Conclusions

These findings suggest that tDCS reorganised connectivity from frontal to fronto-striatal connectivity. As tDCS-related changes were not specific to the effect of working memory, they may have impacted general cognitive control processes. In addition, by reducing MRS-GABA, tDCS might make dlPFC more sensitive and responsive to external stimulation, such as performance of cognitive tasks.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neuroimage. Reports
Neuroimage. Reports Neuroscience (General)
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
87 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信