Black US military veterans respond favourably to a booklet using narratives to normalise shared decision-making

IF 2.2 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Anna M. Barker , Renda Soylemez Wiener , Joel Reisman , Lauren Kearney , Makayla Dones , Gemmae M. Fix
{"title":"Black US military veterans respond favourably to a booklet using narratives to normalise shared decision-making","authors":"Anna M. Barker ,&nbsp;Renda Soylemez Wiener ,&nbsp;Joel Reisman ,&nbsp;Lauren Kearney ,&nbsp;Makayla Dones ,&nbsp;Gemmae M. Fix","doi":"10.1016/j.puhip.2025.100606","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Black Americans, including military veterans, experience worse health outcomes. In the United States, Black men have the highest lung cancer mortality and are less likely to undergo lung cancer screening (LCS). Mistrust caused by systemic racism can inhibit their participation in clinical conversations like shared decision-making (SDM). We sought to empower Black veterans to participate in SDM for LCS by normalising patients advocating for what matters most to them in clinical care decisions. We evaluated the impact of a booklet co-designed with veterans that includes four veteran narratives. They describe how each veteran began to trust their providers and engage in clinical conversations like SDM for LCS.</div></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><div>Pre-post intervention pilot study using surveys to evaluate the impact of the booklet and reactions to the narratives.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The survey was mailed to a random national sample of 450 Black veterans eligible for LCS but not yet screened. Respondents to the baseline survey were mailed the booklet and a follow-up survey.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Thirty-nine veterans completed baseline and follow-up surveys. Mean agreement was above 3.0 (on a Likert scale of 1–5) for five statements about the booklet, with “Veterans eligible for screening should read” being the highest (mean 4.3). Information about LCS was rated most engaging (mean 3.2 on a scale of 1–4) and informative (3.3). The mean rating for veteran stories was 3.1 (engaging) and 2.9 (informative). Reactions to the narratives varied, including whether characters were relatable, likable, or influential. One narrative, describing a veteran slowly developing a trusting relationship with his provider, was particularly influential in encouraging respondents to talk with their doctor.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The positive reaction to the booklet supports the need to raise LCS awareness among LCS-eligible populations, and suggests that narratives may be a promising tool to increase engagement in care among Black veterans.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34141,"journal":{"name":"Public Health in Practice","volume":"9 ","pages":"Article 100606"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Health in Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666535225000254","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Black Americans, including military veterans, experience worse health outcomes. In the United States, Black men have the highest lung cancer mortality and are less likely to undergo lung cancer screening (LCS). Mistrust caused by systemic racism can inhibit their participation in clinical conversations like shared decision-making (SDM). We sought to empower Black veterans to participate in SDM for LCS by normalising patients advocating for what matters most to them in clinical care decisions. We evaluated the impact of a booklet co-designed with veterans that includes four veteran narratives. They describe how each veteran began to trust their providers and engage in clinical conversations like SDM for LCS.

Study design

Pre-post intervention pilot study using surveys to evaluate the impact of the booklet and reactions to the narratives.

Methods

The survey was mailed to a random national sample of 450 Black veterans eligible for LCS but not yet screened. Respondents to the baseline survey were mailed the booklet and a follow-up survey.

Results

Thirty-nine veterans completed baseline and follow-up surveys. Mean agreement was above 3.0 (on a Likert scale of 1–5) for five statements about the booklet, with “Veterans eligible for screening should read” being the highest (mean 4.3). Information about LCS was rated most engaging (mean 3.2 on a scale of 1–4) and informative (3.3). The mean rating for veteran stories was 3.1 (engaging) and 2.9 (informative). Reactions to the narratives varied, including whether characters were relatable, likable, or influential. One narrative, describing a veteran slowly developing a trusting relationship with his provider, was particularly influential in encouraging respondents to talk with their doctor.

Conclusions

The positive reaction to the booklet supports the need to raise LCS awareness among LCS-eligible populations, and suggests that narratives may be a promising tool to increase engagement in care among Black veterans.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Public Health in Practice
Public Health in Practice Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
117
审稿时长
71 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信